Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Migration Background Influences Consumption Patterns Based on Dietary Recommendations of Food Bank Users in Germany

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People with low income tend to eat less balanced than people with higher income. This seems to be particularly the case for people with migration background. This cross-sectional study examined the relation of consumption patterns of 597 food bank users with different migration background in Germany. Questionnaires were distributed assessing sociodemographic information and consumption patterns. Analyses were conducted using binary logistic regressions. Models were controlled for age, gender, type of household and education. The group of German food bank users consumed fewer fruits and vegetables and less fish compared to all other groups with migration background (former USSR, Balkan region, Middle East). A significant predictor for fruit and vegetable consumption was migration status. Participants from the former USSR consumed less often SSBs compared to the other groups. Dietary recommendations for low income populations should take into consideration other aspects besides income such as migration status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office] (Destatis). Migration & integration: population by migration background and sex. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/ SocietyState/Population/MigrationIntegration/MigrationIntegration.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2017.

  2. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office] (Destatis). Persons with a migration background. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/MigrationIntegration/Methods/MigrationBackground.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2017.

  3. Brozka P, et al. Reviewing the topic of migration and health as a new national health target for Germany. Int J Public Health. 2015;60:13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office] (Destatis). At-risk-of-poverty rate by migrant background and selected variables. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/MigrationIntegration/Tables_PersonsMigrationBackground/MigrantStatusPovertyRate.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2017.

  5. Institut für Arbeit und Qualifikation [Institute for Work, Skills and Training] (IAQ). Wirkungen des SGB II auf Personen mit Migrationshintergrund. Projekt IIa1–04/06. Abschlussbericht. [Impact of SGB II for people with migration background. Project IIa1–04/06. Final report. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brussig M, et al. Verschenkte Potenziale: Fehlende Anerkennung von Qualifikationsabschlüssen erschwert die Erwerbsintegration von ALG II-Bezieher/innen mit Migrationshintergrund. [Lost potential: lack of approval of educational degrees hinders integration of long term unemployed people with migration background into the labor force] Report 2009-08. Duisburg: Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ); 2009.

  7. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office] (Destatis). Population by migrant background and personal net income. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/MigrationIntegration/Tables_PersonsMigrationBackground/MigrantStatusHouseholdsNetIncome.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2017.

  8. Geyer S. Social inequalities in the incidence and case fatality of cancers of the lung, the stomach, the bowels, and the breast. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:965–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geyer S, et al. Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:804–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Koch Institute (RKI). Poverty and health in Germany. GBE Kompakt. 2010;5:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reeder BA, Liu L, Horlick L. Sociodemographic variation in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:271–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC health disparities & inequalities report: United States, 2013, morbidity & mortality weekly report (MMWR) supplement. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pampel FC, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:349–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2016: monitoring health for the sustainable development goals. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  15. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Social protection, income and health inequities. Final report of the task group on GDP, taxes, income and welfare. Review of social determinants of health and the health divide in the WHO European Region. Denmark: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lampert T, Kroll LE. Social differences in mortality and life expectancy. GBE Kompakt. 2014;5:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. He K, et al. Changes in intake of fruits and vegetables in relation to risk of obesity and weight gain among middle-aged women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1569–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carter P, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c4229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heuer T, et al. Food consumption of adults in Germany: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II based on diet history interviews. Br J Nutr. 2015;113:1603–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mensink GB, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56:779–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Erdönmez H, Luttermann-Semmer E. Ernährungsgewohnheiten von in Deutschland lebenden türkischen Migranten. [Eating habits of Turkish immigrants living in Germany]. DGE Info 1999;9:132–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kurt G, Georg K. Dietary habits of German vs. non-German residents in Germany. In: Edwards JSA, Hewedi MM, editors. Culinary arts and sciences III: global and national perspectives. Egypt: Al-Karma Press; 2001. p. 419–28.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buchcik J, et al. Body weight and healthy diet among elderly Turkish immigrant. Ernährungs Umschau Int. 2013;60:16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bau AM, et al. Eating behaviour and its association with social living conditions and weight status among adolescent girls: results of the cross-sectional Berlin School Children’s Cohort study. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:1759–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kleiser C, et al. Food intake of young people with a migration background living in Germany. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:324–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:643–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saß AC, et al. Participation of people with migration background in health surveys of the Robert Koch Institute. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58:533–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. The Global Food Banking Network. What is food banking? The global foodbanking network. https://www.foodbanking.org/hunger-food-banking/food-banking. Accessed 21 Jun 2017.

  29. Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel e.V. [German Food Bank Federation]. Die deutschen Tafeln nach Zahlen. Ergebnisse der Tafel-Umfrage 2007. [German food banks in numbers. Results from the food bank survey 2007] (2007). https://www.tafel.de/fileadmin/pdf/Tafel-Umfrage/Tafel-Umfrage_2007_Auswertung.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2017.

  30. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office] (Destatis). Explanatory notes: equalized net income. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Publications/STATmagazin/IncomeConsumptionLivingConditions/2012_12/ExplanatoryNotes.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2017.

  31. Bundesverband Deutsche Tafel e.V. [German Food Bank Federation]. Jahresbericht 2016. Mit der Zeit gehen - Die Tafeln im gesellschaftlichen Wandel. [Annual report 2016. Move with the time. Food banks and societal change]. http://www.tafel.de/fileadmin/pdf/Publikationen/Tafel_JB15_Online.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2017.

  32. Scheidt-Nave C, et al. German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS): design, objectives and implementation of the first data collection wave. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:e730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Robert Koch Institute (RK). GEDA: Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell: GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS. [GEDA: Health in Germany]. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Studien/Geda/Geda_2014_inhalt.html. Accessed 21 Jun 2017.

  34. Depa J, et al. An explorative cross-sectional study examining self-reported health and nutritional status of disadvantaged people using food banks in Germany. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:e141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tinnemann P, et al. Healthy action against poverty: a descriptive analysis of food redistribution charity clients in Berlin, Germany. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22:721–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report on a WHO consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung e. V. [The German Nutrition Society]. 10 guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE) for a wholesome diet. Art-No. 122402, 9th edition, 2013 http://www.dge.de/index.php?id=322. Accessed 09 Jun 2016.

  38. Elmadfa I, et al. European nutrition and health report 2009. Forum Nutr. 2009;62:1–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Winkler E, Turrell G. Confidence to cook vegetables and the buying habits of Australian households. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Golzarand M, et al. Dietary trends in the middle east and north Africa: an ecological study (1961 to 2007). Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:1835–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mehio Sibai A, et al. Nutrition transition and cardiovascular disease risk factors in middle east and north Africa countries: reviewing the evidence. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57:193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gilbert PA, Khokhar S. Changing dietary habits of ethnic groups in Europe and implications for health. Nutr Rev. 2008;66:203–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heine P. Food culture in the near east, middle east, and north Africa. Westport: Greenwood; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bush HM, et al. Body image and weight consciousness among south Asian, Italian and general population women in Britain. Appetite 2001;37:207–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Landman J, Cruickshank JK. A review of ethnicity, health and nutrition-related diseases in relation to migration in the United Kingdom. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:647–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vranjes N, et al. Dietary habits of Yugoslav migrants in Canton Zurich, Switzerland. Abstract-band 1st European workshop on human migration and nutrition Sweden; 1995.

  47. Sanou D, et al. Acculturation and nutritional health of immigrants in Canada: a scoping review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16:24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Osler M, Hansen ET. Dietary knowledge and behaviour among schoolchildren in Copenhagen, Denmark. Scand J Soc Med. 1993;21:135–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1107–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hiza HAB, et al. Diet quality of Americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. OECD. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wardle J, et al. Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27:107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Merrill RM, Richardson JS. Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A121.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Fialkowski MK, et al. Evaluation of dietary assessment tools used to assess the diet of adults participating in the communities advancing the studies of tribal nations across the lifespan cohort. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:65–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Shim J-S, Oh K, Kim HC. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the Schwäbische Tafel Stuttgart e.V. for their cooperation and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutritional Psychology, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany

    Nanette Stroebele-Benschop, Julia Depa, Fiona Gyngell, Annalena Müller, Laila Eleraky & Carolin Hilzendegen

Authors
  1. Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Depa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fiona Gyngell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Annalena Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laila Eleraky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carolin Hilzendegen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanette Stroebele-Benschop.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author NSB, JD, FG, AM, LE and CH declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Given the anonymous nature of the study procedures, only verbal consent was obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stroebele-Benschop, N., Depa, J., Gyngell, F. et al. Migration Background Influences Consumption Patterns Based on Dietary Recommendations of Food Bank Users in Germany. J Immigrant Minority Health 20, 1387–1395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0734-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0734-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation