The Healthy Immigrant Paradox and Child Maltreatment: A Systematic Review
- 518 Downloads
Prior studies suggest that foreign-born individuals have a health advantage, referred to as the Healthy Immigrant Paradox, when compared to native-born persons of the same socio-economic status. This systematic review examined whether the immigrant advantage found in health literature is mirrored by child maltreatment in general and its forms in particular. The author searched Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, CINAHL PLUS, Family and Society Studies Worldwide, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and SocINdex for published literature through December 2015. The review followed an evidence-based Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The author identified 822 unique articles, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed data showed strong support for the healthy immigrant paradox for a general form of maltreatment and physical abuse. The evidence for emotional and sexual abuse was also suggestive of immigrant advantage though relatively small sample size and lack of multivariate controls make these findings tentative. The evidence for neglect was mixed: immigrants were less likely to be reported to Child Protective Services; however, they had higher rates of physical neglect and lack of supervision in the community data. The study results warrant confirmation with newer data possessing strong external validity for immigrant samples.
KeywordsChild maltreatment Immigrants Healthy immigrant paradox Systematic review Epidemiology
This research was supported by National Quality Improvement Center on Differential Response in Child Protective Services doctoral dissertation award through Administration of Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services and the Brown Center for Violence and Injury Prevention, Washington University in St. Louis, doctoral fellowship (R49CE001510-01) through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opinions expressed in the study do not necessarily reflect those of the funders. The author is grateful to Dr. Brett Drake from the Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, for his comments throughout the development of this manuscript.
- 1.Dettlaff AJ, Vidal de Haymes M, Velazquez S, Mindell R, Bruce L. Emerging issues at the intersection of immigration and child welfare: results from a transnational research and policy forum. Child Welf. 2009;88(2):47–67.Google Scholar
- 2.Martin P, Midgley E. Immigration in America 2010. In: Population bulletin update. http://www.prb.org/pdf10/immigration-update2010.pdf.
- 6.US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. Administration on children, youth and families, children’s bureau. 2013. Child Maltreatment 2012. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/index.htm#can.
- 8.Zong J, Batalona J. Frequently requested statistics on immigrants and immigration in the United States. DC: Migration Policy Institution. 2015. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states/.
- 9.Chaudry A, Fortuny K. Children of immigrants: economic well-being. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2010.Google Scholar
- 10.Grieco EM, Acosta YD, de la Cruz P, Gambino C, Gryn T, Larsen LJ, Trevelyan EN, Walters LJ. The foreign-born population in the United States: 2010. United States Census Bureau. 2012. http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/acs-19.pdf.
- 11.Hernadez DJ, Cervantes WD. Children in immigrant families: ensuring opportunity for every child in America. First Focus; 2011. http://fcd-us.org/sites/default/files/First%20Focus%20-%20Children%20in%20Immigrant%20Families.pdf.
- 12.Lincroft Y, Borelli K. Public benefits and child welfare financing. First Focus. 2010. https://firstfocus.org/resources/report/public-benefits-child-welfare-financing/.
- 14.Portes A, Rumbaut RG. Immigrant America: a portrait. California: University of California Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.Camarota S. Immigrants in the United States, 2010: a profile of America’s foreign-born population. Washington, DC: The Center for Immigration Studies; 2012.Google Scholar
- 17.Falicov CJ. Mexican families. In: McGoldrick M, Giordano J, Garcia-Preto N, editors. Ethnicity and family therapy. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2005. p. 229–41.Google Scholar
- 22.Sedlak A, Broadhurst D. Third national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. Executive summary. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and HumanServices; 1996.Google Scholar
- 23.Sedlak A, Mettenburg J, Basena M, Petta J, McPherson K, Greene A, Li S. Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. Report to Congress. Executive Summary. 2010. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/natl_incid/nis4_report_congress_full_pdf_jan2010.pdf.
- 25.Loman LA. Families frequently encountered by child protection services: a report on chronic abuse and neglect. St. Louis: Institute of Applied Research; 2006.Google Scholar
- 33.National Research Council (US) Panel on Race, Ethnicity, and Health in Later Life, Anderson NB, Bulatao RA, Cohen B, editors. Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. doi: 10.17226/11086.
- 41.Hunter WM, Cox CE, Teagle S, Johnson RM, Mathew R, Knight ED, Leeb RT, Smith JB. Measures for assessment of functioning and outcomes in longitudinal research on child abuse. Volume 2: Middle childhood. LONGSCAN Coordinating Center. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2002.Google Scholar
- 53.Kimber M, Henriksen CA, Davidov DM, Goldstein AL, Pitre NY, Tonmyr L, Afifi TO. The association between immigrant generational status, child maltreatment history and intimate partner violence (IPV): evidence from a nationally representative survey. Soc Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(7):1135–44. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-1002-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Applied Research Center. Shattered families: the perilous intersection of immigration enforcement and the child welfare system. 2011. http://arc.org/shatteredfamilies.
- 63.Bui H. Immigrant generational status and delinquency in adolescence: segmented assimilation and racial-ethnic differences. In: Garcia Coll C, Marks A, editors. The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: is becoming American a developmental risk?. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011.Google Scholar
- 64.New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services. The health of the Newest New Jerseyans: a resource guide. 2011. http://www.nj.gov/health/chs/documents/newest_new_jerseyans.pdf.