Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 150–164 | Cite as

“Judging a Body by Its Cover”: Young Lebanese-Canadian Women’s Discursive Constructions of the “Healthy” Body and “Health” Practices

  • Zeina Abou-Rizk
  • Geneviève Rail
Original Paper


Our interest stems from the dramatic increase in the number of obesity studies, which expose Canadian women to a huge amount of information that links health to weight. Using feminist poststructuralist and postcolonial lenses, this paper investigates young Lebanese-Canadian women’s constructions of the body and “health” practices within the context of the dominant obesity discourse. Participant-centered conversations were held with 20 young Christian Lebanese-Canadian women. A thematic analysis was first conducted and was followed by a poststructuralist discourse analysis to further our understanding of how the participants construct themselves as subjects within various discourses surrounding health, obesity, and the body. Our findings reveal that most participants conflate the “healthy” body and the “ideal” body, both of which they ultimately portray as thin. The young women construct the “healthy”/“ideal” body as a solely individual responsibility, thus reinforcing the idea of “docile bodies.” The majority of participants report their frequent involvement in disciplinary practices such as rigorous physical activity and dietary restrictions, and a few young women mention the use of other extreme forms of bodily monitoring such as detoxes, dieting pills, and compulsive exercise. We discuss the language employed by participants to construct their multiple and shifting subjectivities. For instance, many of these Lebanese-Canadian women use the term “us” to dissociate themselves from Lebanese women (“them”), whom they portray as overly focused on thinness and beauty and engaged in physical activity and other bodily practices for “superficial” purposes. The participants also use the “us/them” trope to distance themselves from “Canadian” women (read: white Euro-Canadian women), whom they portray as very physically active for purposes beyond the improvement of the physical appearance of the body. We discuss the impacts of the young Christian Lebanese-Canadian women’s hybrid cultural identities and diasporic spaces on their discursive constructions of the body and “health” practices. Finally, we examine the participants’ fluid subject-positions: On one hand, they construct themselves as neoliberal subjects re-citing elements of dominant neoliberal discourses (self-responsibility for health, traditional femininity, and obesity) but, on the other hand, they at times construct themselves as “timid” poststructuralist subjects expressing awareness of, and “micro-resistance” to such discourses.


Body Discourse Obesity Women Lebanese Beauty Identity Culture Practices 


Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest that exists in the context of the writing and/or publication of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. World Health Organization—Obesity. Retrieved 30 Sept 2009 from (2006a).
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. World Health Organization’s global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Retrieved 30 Sept 2009 from (2006b).
  3. 3.
    Campos P. The obesity myth: why America’s obsession with weight is hazardous to your health. New York: Penguin Books; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaesser GA. Pro and con: Is obesity a disease? (No). Family Pract News. 2003;33(16).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gard M, Wright J. The obesity epidemic. Science, morality and ideology. London: Routledge; 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans J, Rich E, Davies B. The emperor’s new clothes: fat, thin and overweight. The social fabrication of risk and health. J Teach Phys Educ. 2004;23(4):372–92.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grogan S. Body image: understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children. Hove: Psychology Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nasser M, Katzman MA, Gordon RA. Eating disorders and cultures in transition. Brunner-Routlege and Taylor & Francis: Hove and New York; 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burns M, Gavey N. Dis/orders of weight control: Bulimic and/or health weight practices. In: Riley S, Burns M, Frith H, Wiggins S, Markula P, editors. Critical bodies representations, identities and practices of weight and body management. Houndmills: Palgrive Macmillan; 2008. p. 139–54.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright J, O’Flynn G, Macdonald D. Being fit and looking healthy: young women’s and men’s constructions of health and fitness. Sex Roles. 2006;54:707–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rail G. Canadian youth’s discursive constructions of health in the context of obesity discourses. In: Wright J, Harwood V, editors. Biopolitics and the ‘obesity epidemic’: governing bodies. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 141–56.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evans B. ‘I’d feel ashamed’: girls bodies and sport participation. Gender Place Cult A J Fem Geogr. 2006;13(5):547–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rich E, Evans J. Making sense of eating disorders in schools. Discourse Stud Cult Politics Educ. 2005;26(2):247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malson H. Deconstructing un/healthy body-weight and weight management. In: Riley S, Burns M, Frith H, Wiggins S, Markula P, editors. Critical bodies representations, identities and practices of weight and body management. Houndmills: Palgrive Macmillan; 2008. p. 27–42.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Annis NM, Cash TF, Hrabosky JI. Body image and psychosocial differences among stable average weight, currently overweight, and formerly overweight women: the role of stigmatizing experiences. Body Image. 2004;1:155–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darby A, Hay P, Mond J, Rodgers B, Owen C. Disordered eating behaviours and cognitions in young women with obesity: relationship with psychological status. Int J Obes. 2007;31:876–82.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedman KE, Reichmann SK, Costanzo PR, Zelli A, Ashmore JA, Musante GJ. Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: relation to psychological functioning in obese adults. Obes Res. 2005;13:907–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foucault M. The birth of the clinic. London: Tavistock; 1973.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage; 1979.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhabha HK. The location of culture. London: Routledge; 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brah A. Cartographies of diaspora. London: Routledge; 1996.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Tavistock Publications and Harper Colophon; 1972.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books; 1977.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Said E. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon; 1978.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spivak GC. Can the subaltern speak? In: Ashcroft B, Griffiths G, Tiffin H, editors. The post-colonial studies reader. London: Routledge, 1995[1988], p 24–28.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weedon C. Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. London: Blackwell, 1997[1987].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foucault M. The history of sexuality, vol. 1., An introductionHarmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1978.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rail G, Harvey J. Body at work: michel Foucault and the Sociology of Sport. Sociol Sport J. 1995;12(2):164–79.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson JM. Gender, ‘race’, poverty, health and discourses of health reform in the context of globalization: a postcolonial feminist perspective in policy research. Nurs Inq. 2000;7:220–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anderson JM. Lessons from a postcolonial-feminist perspective: suffering and a path to healing. Nurs Inq. 2004;11(4):238–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hooks B. Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Minh-ha T. Not you/like you: post-colonial women and the interlocking questions of identity and difference. Inscriptions. 1988;3(4):71–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gandhi L. Postcolonial a critical introduction theory. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin; 1998.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Young RJC. Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anderson JM, et al. ‘Re-writing’ cultural safety within the postcolonial/postnationalist feminist project: toward new epistemologies of healing. Adv Nurs Sci. 2003;26(3):196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Collins PH. Toward a new vision: race, class and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race Sex Class. 1993;1(1):23–45.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge; 2000.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Browne AJ, Smye VL, Varcoe C. Postcolonial-feminist theoretical perspectives and women’s health. In: Hankivsky O, Morrow M, Varcoe C, editors. Women’s health in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2007. p. 124–42.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mohanty CT. Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Fem Rev. 1988;30:61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spivak GC. Old and new: women in the transnational world. Textual Prac. 1996;10(2):245–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schwandt TA. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 118–37.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Christensen P, Prout A. Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood. 2002;9(4):477–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Valentine G. Exploring young people’s narratives of identity. Geoforum. 2000;31:257–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tlili H, Rail G. Young Canadian women immigrating from the Mahgreb and their discursive constructions of health and the body in the context of the current obesity discourse. Geneva: Conference of the European Sociological Association; 2011.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jiwani N, Rail G. Islam, Hijab and young Shia Muslim Canadian women’s discursive constructions of physical activity. Sociol Sport J. 2010;27(3):251–67.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Denzin NK. The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 500–15.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wright J. A feminist poststructuralist methodology for the study of gender construction in physical education: description of a study. J Teach Phys Educ. 1995;15(1):1–24.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Butler J. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenemology and feminist theory. In: Case S, editor. Performing feminisms: feminist critical theory and theatre. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP; 1990. p. 270–82.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Butler J. Excitable speech: a politics of the performative. New York: Routledge; 1997.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kwan S. Competing motivational discourses for weight loss: means to ends and the nexus of beauty and health. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(9):1223–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Orbach S. Fat is a feminist issue. London: Arrow Books; 1988.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Markula P. Firm but shapely, fit but sexy, strong but thin: the postmodern aerobicizing female bodies. Sociol Sport J. 1995;12:424–53.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chernin K. The obsession: reflections on the tyranny of slenderness. New York: Harper and Row; 1981.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Brownell KD. Dieting and the search for the perfect body: where physiology and culture collide. Behav Ther. 1991;22(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    George T, Rail G. Barbie meets the Bindi: constructions of health among second generation South Asian Canadian women. J Women’s Health Urban Life. 2006;4(2):45–67.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Diaz VA, Mainous AG, Everett CJ. The association between weight fluctuation and mortality: results from a population-based cohort study. J Community Health. 2005;30:153–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    McLaren MA. Feminism, Foucault, and the embodied subjectivity. New York: State University of New York Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rail G. The birth of the obesity clinic: confessions of the flesh, biopedagogies and physical culture. Sociol Sport J. 2012;29(2):227–53.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cameron C, Craig CL, Coles C, Cragg S. Increasing physical activity: Encouraging physical activity through schools. Ottawa: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute; 2003.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Craig CL, Cameron C. Increasing physical activity: assessing trends from 1998–2003. Ottawa: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute; 2004.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mcdonald JT, Kennedy S. Is migration to Canada associated with unhealthy weight gain? Overweight and obesity among Canada’s immigrants. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(12):2469–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McDonald JT. The health behaviours of immigrants and native-born people in Canada. Atlantic Metropolis Centre Working Paper Series: University of New Brunswick; 2006.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Azzarito L. The rise of the corporate curriculum: fatness, fitness, and whiteness. In: Wright J, Harwood V, editors. Biopolitics and the ‘obesity epidemic’: governing bodies. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 183–96.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Altabe M, O-Garo KN. Hispanic body images. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body image a handbook of theory research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002. p. 250–6.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cachelin FM, Rebeck RM, Chung GH, Pelayo E. Does ethnicity influence body-size preference? A comparison of body image and body size. Obes Res. 2001;10(3):158–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Celio AA, Zabinski MF, Winfley DE. African American body images. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T. editors. Body image a handbook of theory research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford Press, 2002; p 234–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Population HealthUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Simone de Beauvoir InstituteConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations