Advertisement

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 494–499 | Cite as

Fertility After Cesarean Delivery Among Somali-Born Women Resident in the USA

  • Wael Salem
  • Priscilla Flynn
  • Amy Weaver
  • Brian Brost
Original Paper

Abstract

We evaluated the reproductive impact of cesarean versus vaginal delivery in Somali immigrants. Data were extracted for 106 Somali women delivering vaginally (64%) or by cesarean section (36%) between 1994 and 2006. Index delivery (vaginal versus cesarean) was compared to the cumulative incidence rate of subsequent deliveries. The incidence rate of a delivery after a vaginal delivery was 3.3% (CI:0–7.8%), 55.4% (CI:40.1–66.8%) and 74.4% (CI:59.0–84.0%) at 1, 2 and 3 years. Cesarean delivery lead to a second delivery incidence rate of 2.9%(95%CI:0–8.2%), 25.9%(95%CI:9.8–39.2%) and 58.1% (95%CI:27.0–72.2%) at 1, 2 and 3 years. Somali women delivering vaginally were 1.56 times (95% CI:0.94–2.57; P = 0.084) more likely to have a subsequent delivery. The likelihood of Somali women having a second child after cesarean section is lower at 2 and 3 year follow-up.

Keywords

Cesarean section Somali Infertility Migrant 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this work was provided by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic.

Details of Ethics Approval

The study protocol was reviewed and then approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. This study received institutional approval #08-004210 for review of patient data in July 2008.

Disclosures of Interest Statement

No authors had any conflict of interest with the research study.

Funding

This study was funded by the Mayo Clinic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References

  1. 1.
    Vangen S, Stoltenberg C, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Stray-Pedersen B. Perinatal complications among ethnic Somalis in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:317–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson EB, Reed SD, Hitti J, Batra M. Increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome among Somali immigrants in Washington state. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:475–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Small R, Gagnon A, Gissler M, et al. Somali women and their pregnancy outcomes postmigration: data from six receiving countries. BJOG. 2008;115:1630–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoong W, Kolhe S, Karoshi M, Ullah M, Nauta M. The obstetric performance of United Kingdom asylum seekers from Somalia: a case-control study and literature review. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2005;50:175–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Essen B, Hanson BS, Ostergren PO, Lindquist PG, Gudmundsson S. Increased perinatal mortality among sub-Saharan immigrants in a city-population in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:737–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Essen B, Johnsdotter S, Hovelius B, et al. Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in Sweden. Bjog. 2000;107:1507–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beine K, Fullerton J, Palinkas L, Anders B. Conceptions of prenatal care among Somali women in San Diego. J Nurse Midwifery. 1995;40:376–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chalmers B, Hashi KO. 432 Somali women’s birth experiences in Canada after earlier female genital mutilation. Birth. 2000;27:227–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies MM, Bath PA. The maternity information concerns of Somali women in the United Kingdom. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36:237–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vangen S, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Traeen B, Stray-Pedersen B. Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;112:29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Declercq E, Menacker F, Macdorman M. Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:867–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;55:1–18.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:946–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. Lancet. 2000;356:1677–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith GC, Wood AM, Pell JP, Dobbie R. First cesarean birth and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:90–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hemminki E. Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy–a review of cohort studies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1996;10:366–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collin SM, Marshall T, Filippi V. Caesarean section and subsequent fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. BJOG. 2006;113:276–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oral E, Elter K. The impact of cesarean birth on subsequent fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:238–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Visco AG, Viswanathan M, Lohr KN, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1517–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garel M, Lelong N, Marchand A, Kaminski M. Psychosocial consequences of caesarean childbirth: a four-year follow-up study. Early Hum Dev. 1990;21:105–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall MH, Campbell DM, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:1297–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mollison J, Porter M, Campbell D, Bhattacharya S. Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy. BJOG. 2005;112:1061–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhattacharya S, Porter M, Harrild K, et al. Absence of conception after caesarean section: voluntary or involuntary? BJOG. 2006;113:268–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Omar MM, Hogberg U, Bergstrom B. Fertility, infertility and child survival of Somali women. Scand J Soc Med. 1994;22:194–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Inhorn MC, Balen FV. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002. p. viii, 347.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dumont A, de Bernis L, Bouvier-Colle MH, Breart G. Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;358:1328–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flynn PM, Foster EM, Brost BC. Indicators of acculturation related to Somali Refugee women’s birth outcomes in Minnesota. J Immigr Minor Health. 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10903-009-9289-9, ISSN 1557-1912 (Print), 1557-1920 (Online), PMD 19757054.
  28. 28.
    Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York: Springer; 2000. p. xiii, 350.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Porter M, Bhattacharya S, van Teijlingen E, Templeton A. Does Caesarean section cause infertility? Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1983–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J. The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1914–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    The Minnesota Community Health Worker Alliance Vol 2009.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tollanes MC, Melve KK, Irgens LM, Skjaerven R. Reduced fertility after cesarean delivery: a maternal choice. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1256–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wael Salem
    • 1
  • Priscilla Flynn
    • 2
  • Amy Weaver
    • 3
  • Brian Brost
    • 4
  1. 1.Mayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Office of Women’s HealthRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical Statistics and BioinformaticsMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations