Advertisement

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 798–805 | Cite as

Maternal Nativity Status and Birth Outcomes in Asian Immigrants

  • Cheng Qin
  • Jeffrey B. Gould
Original Paper

Abstract

Background The study examines the relationship between maternal nativity, maternal risks and birth outcomes in six Asian sub-populations. Methods U.S.- versus foreign-born immigrants of Chinese (67,222), Japanese (18,275) and Filipino (87,1208), Vietnamese (45,229), Cambodian/Laotian (21,237), and Korean (23,430) singleton live births were assessed for maternal risks and birth outcomes. Results U.S.-born Chinese and Japanese mothers had lower risk and increased preterm births but similar infant mortality, while U.S.-born Filipino mothers had higher risk and higher infant mortality. U.S.-born mothers of more recent Cambodian/Laotian and Vietnamese immigrants had higher risk and delivered more small and preterm births, while U.S.-born Korean mothers had higher risk but no differences in preterm and low birthweight delivery. Discussion Asians in America are a distinctly heterogenous population in terms of the relationship between maternal risk factors and birth outcomes and the influence of maternal nativity on this relationship.

Keywords

Asian immigrants Maternal nativity Birth outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Ms. Amy Marks and Ms. Beth Anderson for their analytical support and comments on the preliminary work. We thank also the Maternal and Child Health Branch, California Department of Health Services for their support of the Perinatal Profiles project (Contract 99-85027).

References

  1. 1.
    Schmidley AD. Profile of the foreign born population in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2001. Current Population Reports, Series P23–206.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh GK, Yu SM. Adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences between US-and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(6):837–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ventura SJ, Taffel SM. Childbearing characteristics of U.S- and foreign-born Hispanic mothers. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(6):647–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scribner R, Dwyer JH. Acculturation and low birthwieght among Latinos in the Hispanic HANES. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(9):1263–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cobas JA, Balcazar H, Benin MB, Keith VM, Chong Y. Acculturation and low-birthweight infants among Latino women: a Reanalysis of HHANES Data with Structural Equation Models. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(3):394–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cabral H, Fried LE, Levenson S, Amaro H, Zuckerman B. Foreign-born and US-born black women: differences in health behaviors and birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(1):70–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engel T, Alexander GR, Leland NL. Pregnancy outcomes of US-born Puerto Ricans: the role of maternal nativity status. Am J Prev Med. 1995;11(1):34–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cervantes A, Keith L, Wyshak G. Adverse birth outcomes among native-born and immigrant women: replicating national evidence regarding Mexican at the local level. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3(2):99–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willians RL, Binkin NJ, Clingman EJ. Pregnancy outcomes among Spanish-surname women in California. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(4):387–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexander GR, Mor JM, Kogan MD, Leland NL, Kieffer E. Pregnancy outcomes of US-born and foreign-born Japanese Americans. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(6):820–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Asia society. Linking the past to present: Asian Americans then and now. 1996. Retrieved November 2007 from. http://www.askasia.org/teachers/essays/essay.php?no=22.
  12. 12.
    Tashiro M. Tape documentation of perinatal record format: California birth cohort, 1992–1997. Sacramento: California Dept of Health Services, Maternal and Child Health Branch; 1995–2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qin C, Gould JB. The Asian birth outcome gap. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(4):279–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marguerite Ro. Overview of Asian and Pacific Islanders in the United States and California. Center for Policy Alternatives. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.communityvoices.org/Uploads/om3gfk55hhzyvrn00n4nerbf_20020828090003.pdf.
  16. 16.
    The Central intelligence agency. The world factbook 2005. Retrieved November 2007 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.
  17. 17.
    Amon E. Preterm labor. In: Reece EA, Hobbins J, editors. Medicine of the fetus and mother. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1999. p. 1529–79.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rush RW, Davey DA, Segall ML. The effect of preterm delivery on perinatal mortality. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;85:806–11.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mathews TJ, Menacker F, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2002 period: linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004;53(10):1–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hrboticky N, Krondl M. Acculturation to Canadian foods by Chinese immigrant boys: changes in the perceived flavor, health value and prestige of foods. Appetite. 1984;5(2):117–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kramer MS, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14(3):194–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cardoso MA, Hamada GS, de Souza JM, Tsugane S, Tokudome S. Dietary patterns in Japanese migrants to South-eastern Brazil and their descendants. J Epidemiol. 1997;7(4):198–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Markides KS, Krause N, Mendes de Leon CF. Acculturation and alcohol consumption among Mexican Americans: a three-generational study. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:1178–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marin G, Peres-Stable EJ, Marian BV. Cigarette smoking among San Francisco Hispanics: the role of acculturation and gender. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:196–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zambrana RE, Scrimshaw SC, Collins N, Dunkel-Schetter C. Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: the role of acculturation. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(6):1022–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaplan MS, Marks G. Adverse effects of acculturation: psychological distress among Mexican American young adults. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31:1313–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borges G, Lopez-Cervantes M, Medina-Mora ME, Tapia-Conyer R, Garrido F. Alcohol consumption, low birth weight, and preterm delivery in the National Addiction Survey (Mexico). Int J Addict. 1993;28(4):355–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kelly RH, Russo J, Holt VL, Danielsen BH, Zatzick DF, Walker E, et al. Psychiatric and substance use disorders as risk factors for low birth weight and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(20):297–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Faden VB, Graubard BI, Dufour M. The relationship of drinking and birth outcomes in a US national sample of expectant mothers. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997;11(2):167–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horta BL, Victora CG, Menezes AM, Halpern R, Barros FC. Low birthweight, preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation in relation to maternal smoking. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997;11(2):140–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wright SP, Mitchell EA, Thompson JM, Clements MS, Ford RP, Stewart AW. Risk factors for preterm birth: a New Zealand study. N Z Med J. 1998;111(1058):14–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Division of Reproductive Health, Maternal and Infant Health BranchCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Stanford University School of MedicineBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations