Law in Practice: Obstacles to a Smokefree Workplace Policy in Bars Serving Asian Patrons
The California smokefree workplace ordinance (AB13) has been well-received, even in bars where deeply established traditions of smoking may exist. However, a closer investigation of bars where indoor smoking persists revealed that bar workers in some ethnic minority communities continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke in their workplaces. To identify sociocultural factors that may impede the adoption of AB13, the researchers conducted 150 observations and 29 patron and staff interviews in 50 California bars serving Asian patrons in Los Angeles and San Francisco counties. Observers witnessed indoor smoking in 82% of the bars. Interviews revealed that social relationships, social interactions, and a tendency to avoid confrontation complicated the positive reception of AB13 within these bars. Accounting for sociocultural factors provides a nuanced understanding of the challenges involved in implementing tobacco control policy in such diverse settings and may allow for culturally appropriate tobacco policy development and implementation in other jurisdictions.
KeywordsTobacco control Smokefree workplace Cross-cultural policy Asian immigrants
Funding for data collection was provided by the University of California Office of the President’s Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) grant 12RT-0116 and analysis funding was provided by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health grant 1R01-CA100772. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. We wish to acknowledge the efforts of the field observers and interviewers and the support and cooperation of officials in San Francisco and Los Angeles counties. We thank Danielle Cooper at the University of North Texas, and Rachelle Annechino and Scott Martin at the Prevention Research Center for their thoughtful comments and assistance on this paper.
- 13.Lee JP, Moore RS, Martin SE. Unobtrusive observations of smoking in urban California bars. J Drug Issues. 2003;33(4):983–1000.Google Scholar
- 14.Muhr T. User’s manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2004.Google Scholar
- 15.LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ. Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 16.Lee JP, Antin TMJ, Moore RS. Social organization in bars: implications for tobacco control policy. Contemp Drug Probl. (In press).Google Scholar
- 17.Allison A. Nightwork: sexuality, pleasure, and corporate masculinity in a Tokyo hostess club. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.Google Scholar
- 20.United States Census Bureau. American community survey. United States Census Bureau; 2006.Google Scholar
- 21.Mackay Ja EM. The tobacco atlas. Brighton, UK: Myriad Editions for the World Health Organization; 2002.Google Scholar
- 22.Corrao MA, Guindon GE, Sharma N, Shokoohi DF. Tobacco control country profiles. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2000.Google Scholar
- 23.Brook T, Luong HV. Culture and economy: the shaping of capitalism in Eastern Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1997.Google Scholar
- 24.Hall ET. Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books; 1976.Google Scholar
- 25.Janelli RL, Yim D. Making capitalism: the social and cultural construction of a South Korean conglomerate. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
- 32.Satterlund TD, Lee JP, Moore RS, Antin TMJ. Challenges to implementing and enforcing California’s smoke-free workplace act in bars. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. (In press).Google Scholar