Literature has consistently highlighted the role of time perspective (TP) in predicting different psychological outcomes. Despite the importance that TP seems to have, few studies have investigated its role in personal relationships or attempted to explain the underlying mechanisms within this complex model. The purpose of this study was therefore to expand research not only on the associations between the TP frames (past, present and future) and couple satisfaction, but also to test a model that sees TP as a mediator in the relationship between family functioning and couple satisfaction. One hundred and forty-six heterosexual couples of emerging adults (aged between 20 and 34) participated in the study. Path analyses showed that only present-orientated TP was linked to higher couple satisfaction in both partners, simultaneously playing a mediating role between the family functioning and the quality of the couple’s relationship. Unexpectedly, partners’ effects were not significant in the model. Finally, the implications of these findings for future studies and practical interventions are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allen, J., Fok, S. M., Charles, C. C. T., Trimble, B., Lee, K., & Qungasvik, T. (2019). Strengths-Based Assessment for Suicide Prevention: Reasons for Life as a Protective Factor From Yup’ik Alaska Native Youth Suicide. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119875789.
Anderson, J. R., Johnson, M. D., Liu, W., Zheng, F., Hardy, N. R., & Lindstrom, R. A. (2014). Young adult romantic relationships in Mainland China: Perceptions of family of origin functioning are directly and indirectly associated with relationship success. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(7), 871–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513508727.
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: the winding roadfrom the late teens through the Twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnett, J. J. (2006). Emerging Adulthood: Understanding the New Way of Coming of Age. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging Adults in America: Coming of Age in the 21st Century (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: APA.
Barelds, D. P. H. (2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 19, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.549.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Beckmann, L. (2020). Family relationships as risks and buffers in the link between parent-to-child physical violence and adolescent-to-parent physical violence. Journal of family violence, 35(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00048-0.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. (2003). Time to find the right balance. The Psychologist, 16(3), 129–131.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. Positive Psychology in Practice, 12, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch10.
Bryant, C. M., & Conger, R. D. (2002). An intergenerational model of romantic relationship development. In A. L. Vangelisti, H. T. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 57–82). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.54.3.165.
Cheung, R. Y., Leung, M. C., Chiu, H. T., Kwan, J. L., Yee, L. T., & Hou, W. K. (2019). Family functioning and psychological outcomes in emerging adulthood: Savoring positive experiences as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2693–2713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518798499.
Crocetti, E., Luyckx, K., Scrignaro, M., & Sica, L. S. (2011). Identity formation in Italian emerging adults: A cluster-analytic approach and associations with psychosocial functioning. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(5), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.576858.
Crocetti, E., Rabaglietti, E., & Sica, L. S. (2012). Personal identity in Italy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2012(138), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20023.
D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s Stanford time perspective inventory (STPI)-short form. Time & Society, 12(2–3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X030122010.
Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007.
Duangpatra, K. N., Bradley, G. L., & Glendon, A. I. (2009). Variables affecting emerging adults’ self-reported risk and reckless behaviors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.011.
Dwivedi, A., & Rastogi, R. (2016). Future time perspective, hope and life satisfaction: A study on emerging adulthood. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 5(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278682116673790.
Dwivedi, A., & Rastogi, R. (2019). Predicting social well-being using time perspective in emerging adults. Journal of Health Management, 21(4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063419884416.
Donati, M. A., Boncompagni, J., Scabia, A., Morsanyi, K., & Primi, C. (2019). Using the adolescent time inventory—Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) to assess time attitudes in Italian adolescents and young adults: Psychometric properties and validity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418797020.
Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X07086304.
Elliott, I., & Coker, S. (2008). Independent self-construal, self-reflection, and self-rumination: A path model for predicting happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(3), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701447368.
Fok, C. C. T., AllenHenry, J. D., & Team, P. A. (2014). The Brief Family Relationship Scale: A brief measure of the relationship dimension in family functioning. Assessment, 21(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111425856.
Fonseca, G., da Silva, J. T., Paixão, M. P., Crespo, C., & Relvas, A. P. (2019). Future hopes and fears of portuguese emerging adults in macroeconomic hard times: The role of economic strain and family functioning. Emerging Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696819874956.
Fosco, G. M., Caruthers, A. S., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). A six-year predictive test of adolescent family relationship quality and effortful control pathways to emerging adult social and emotional health. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028873.
Gilbert, S. P., & Sifers, S. K. (2011). Bouncing back from a breakup: Attachment, time perspective, mental health, and romantic loss. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 25(4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2011.605693.
Hendrick, S.S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430.
Holman, E. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). The social language of time: The time perspective–social network connection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530902880415.
Johnson, V. K., Gans, S. E., Kerr, S., & Deegan, K. (2008). Managing the transition to college: The role of family cohesion and adolescents’ emotional coping strategies. The Journal of College Orientation and Transition, 15, 29–46.
Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BA210207.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford press.
Kruger, D. J., Reischl, T., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). Time perspective as a mechanism for functional developmental adaptation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099336.
Kooij, D.T., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., Rudolph, C.W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306.
Konowalczyk, S., Buhl, M., Moon, J., & Mello, Z. R. (2019). the past, present, and future all matter: How time perspective is associated with optimism and sensation seeking among young adults. Research in Human Development, 16(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2019.1662709.
Kvasková, L., Almenara, C.A. (2019). Time perspective and career decision-making self-efficacy: A longitudinal examination among young adult students. Journal of Career Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319847292.
Laghi, F., D’Alessio, M., Pallini, S., & Baiocco, R. (2009). Attachment representations and time perspective in adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9249-0.
Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Liga, F., Guarino, A., & Baumgartner, E. (2013). Identity status differences among Italian adolescents: Associations with time perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(3), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.12.018.
Lanz, M., & Tagliabue, S. (2007). Do I really need someone in order to become an adult? Romantic relationships during emerging adulthood in Italy. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(5), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407306713.
Leccardi, C. (2005). Facing uncertainty. Young people, time and biographies in the New Century. Young Nordic Journal of Youth Studies, 13, 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308805051317.
Leshkovska, E. A., & Shterjovska, M. (2014). Time perspective as predictor of meaning in life. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education:(IJCRSEE), 2(1), 25–29.
Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, 56(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.239.
Mannerström, R., Muotka, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2019). Associations between identity processes and success in developmental tasks during the transition from emerging to young adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(9), 1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1571179.
Masarik, A. S., Conger, R. D., Martin, M. J., Donnellan, M. B., Masyn, K. E., & Lorenz, F. O. (2013). Romantic relationships in early adulthood: Influences of family, personality, and relationship cognitions. Personal Relationships, 20, 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01416.x.
MediaStolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2016). Time perspectives predict mood states and satisfaction with life over and above personality. Current Psychology, 35(4), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9515-2.
Mello, Z. R., Oladipo, S. E., Paoloni, V. C., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). Time perspective and risky behaviors among Nigerian young adults. Journal of Adult Development, 26(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9304-2.
Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2007). The adolescent time inventory—English. Berkeley, The University of California: Unpublished scale.
Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). The adolescent time Inventory technical manual. California: San Francisco California & Berkeley.
Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1994). Family environment scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Pedro, M. F., Ribeiro, T., & Shelton, K. H. (2015). Romantic attachment and family functioning: The mediating role of marital satisfaction. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3482–3495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0150-6.
Rollins, P., Williams, A., & Sims, P. (2018). Family dynamics: Family-of-origin cohesion during adolescence and adult romantic relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 40(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9430-1.
Sakalli-Ugurlu, N. (2003). How do romantic relationship satisfaction, gender stereotypes, and gender relate to future time orientation in romantic relationships? The Journal of Psychology, 137(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600615.
Scabini, E., Marta, E., & Lanz, M. (2006). The transition to adulthood and family relations: An intergenerational approach. Hove: Psychology Press.
Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., & van Beek, W. (2015). Time perspective theory; Review, research, and application. Cham: Springer International. Berlin: Springer Science+ Business.
Stolarski, M., Wojtkowska, K., & Kwiecińska, M. (2016). Time for love: Partners’ time perspectives predict relationship satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples. Time & Society, 25(3), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15596703.
Stolarski, M., Wojciechowski, J., Matthews, G. (2020a). Seeking the origins of time perspectives–Intelligence, temperament, or family environment? A one-year longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 110080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110080.
Stolarski, M., Zajenkowski, M., Jankowski, K. S., & Szymaniak, K. (2020b). Deviation from the balanced time perspective: A systematic review of empirical relationships with psychological variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109772.
Taber, B. J., & Blankemeyer, M. S. (2015). Time perspective and vocational identity statuses of emerging adults. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12008.
Tagliabue, S., Crocetti, E., & Lanz, M. (2016). Emerging adulthood features and criteria for adulthood: Variable-and person-centered approaches. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1074985.
Xia, M., Fosco, G. M., Lippold, M. A., & Feinberg, M. E. (2018). A developmental perspective on young adult romantic relationships: Examining family and individual factors in adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 47(7), 1499–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0815-8.
Webster, J. D., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Westerhof, G. J. (2010). Mapping the future of reminiscence: A conceptual guide for research and practice. Research on Aging, 32(4), 527–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027510364122.
Webster, J. D., & Ma, X. (2013). A balanced time perspective in adulthood: Well-being and developmental effects. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 32(4), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980813000500.
Zaleski, Z., Cycon, A. and Kurc, A. (2001). Future time perspective and subjective well-being in adolescent samples. In P. Schmuck and K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving. Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
Zambianchi, M., & Bitti, P. E. R. (2014). The role of proactive coping strategies, time perspective, perceived efficacy on affect regulation, divergent thinking and family communication in promoting social well-being in emerging adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 116, 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0307-x.
Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021.
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York, NY: The Free Press.
No financial support was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
All authors report that they have no conflicts of interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Gugliandolo, M.C., Costa, S., Lo Cricchio, M. et al. Exploring the Role of Time Perspective in Emerging Adult Couples: A Mediation Model. J Happiness Stud (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00368-3
- Time perspective
- Family functioning
- Couple satisfaction
- Emerging adults