Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 1089–1101 | Cite as

A Daily Diary Investigation of the Link Between Television Watching and Positive Affect

  • Deniz Bayraktaroglu
  • Gul GunaydinEmail author
  • Emre Selcuk
  • Anthony D. Ong
Research Paper

Abstract

Past research has shown a negative relationship between time spent watching television (TV) and several indicators of hedonic well-being—including positive affect (PA). However, cross-sectional designs employed in most of these studies do not allow for inferences regarding the direction of the link between TV watching and PA. Present research aimed to address this gap by using daily diary data from a large national sample of U.S. adults (N = 1668, age = 33–83 years). Respondents reported time spent watching TV as well as PA for eight consecutive days. Results of multilevel modeling analyses showed that duration of TV watching on the previous day did not significantly predict changes in PA on the next day. However, PA on the previous day significantly predicted decreases in duration of TV watching the following day. The results held after controlling for factors known to predict duration of TV watching and PA (i.e., age, gender, income level, employment status, marital status, health status, and personality traits). The present research goes beyond past cross-sectional work by shedding light on the direction of the link between TV watching and PA. Our findings indicate that watching TV does not seem to diminish PA—as critics of TV proclaim—but individuals seem to watch TV to a greater extent whenever they experience reduced PA.

Keywords

Television Positive affect Hedonic well-being Leisure Daily diary design 

References

  1. Anastassea-Vlachou, K., Fryssira-Kanioura, H., Papathanasiou-Klontza, D., et al. (1996). The effects of television viewing in Greece, and the role of the paediatrician: A familiar triangle revisited. European Journal of Pediatrics, 155(12), 1057–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachmann, O., Grunschel, C., & Fries, S. (2018). Multitasking and feeling good? Autonomy of additional activities predicts affect. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9973-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  4. Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3–4), 506–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Time spent in leisure activities in 2014, by gender, age and educational attainment. Retrieved from United States Department of Labor website: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2015/time-spent-in-leisure-activities-in-2014-by-gender-age-and-educational-attainment.htm. Accessed 19 June 2017.
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2010). Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, C. G., Bickham, D., Ross, C. S., & Rich, M. (2015). Multitasking with television among adolescents. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(1), 130–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.998228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunado, J., & Perez de Gracia, F. (2012). Does media consumption make us happy? Evidence for Spain. Journal of Media Economics, 25(1), 8–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2012.651052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Depp, C. A., Schkade, D. A., Thompson, W. K., & Jeste, D. V. (2010). Age, affective experience, and television use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(2), 173–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erber, R. (1996). The self-regulation of moods. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 251–275). Oxford: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fazio, A. (1977). A concurrent validational study of the NCHS general well-being schedule. Vital and health statistics, series 2, no. 73. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_073.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  14. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions-Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1378.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313–332.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey, B. S., Benesch, C., & Stutzer, A. (2007). Does watching TV make us happy? Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(3), 283–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617–638.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomillion, S., Gabriel, S., Kawakami, K., & Young, A. F. (2017). Let’s stay home and watch TV: The benefits of shared media use for close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 855–874.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516660388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodwin, P. E., Intrieri, R. C., & Papini, D. R. (2005). Older adults’ affect while watching television. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 29(2), 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J016v29n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunaydin, G., Selcuk, E., & Ong, A. D. (2016). Trait reappraisal predicts affective reactivity to daily positive and negative events. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1000.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (1998). Positive moods derived from leisure and their relationship to happiness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(3), 523–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00082-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 295–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan, A. B., & Robinson, T. N. (2008). Children, television viewing, and weight status: Summary and recommendations from an expert panel meeting. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 615(1), 119–132.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207308681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kataria, M., & Regner, T. (2011). A note on the relationship between television watching and individual happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 53–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2008). Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: Distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 924–938.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208315938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1997). The Midlife Development Inventory (MIDI) personality scales: Scale construction and scoring. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  29. Litt, A., Reich, T., Maymin, S., & Shiv, B. (2011). Pressure and perverse flights to familiarity. Psychological Science, 22(4), 523–531.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611400095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McIlwraith, R. D. (1998). “I’m addicted to television”: The personality, imagination, and TV watching patterns of self-identified TV addicts. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(3), 371–386.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159809364456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moskalenko, S., & Heine, S. J. (2003). Watching your troubles away: Television viewing as a stimulus for subjective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202238373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD. (2016). Time use across the world. Retrieved from OECD website: https://www.oecd.org/gender/data/OECD_1564_TUSupdatePortal.xls. Accessed 19 June 2017.
  35. Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1005–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perse, E. M., & Rubin, A. M. (1990). Chronic loneliness and television use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34(1), 37–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159009386724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Death and black diamonds: Meaning, mortality, and the meaning maintenance model. Psychological Inquiry, 17(4), 309–318.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701366985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qian, X. L., Yarnal, C. M., & Almeida, D. M. (2014). Is leisure time availability associated with more or less severe daily stressors? An examination using eight-day diary data. Leisure Sciences, 36(1), 35–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2014.860782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., Jr., & du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  40. Robinson, J. P., & Martin, S. (2008). What do happy people do? Social Indicators Research, 89(3), 565–571.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9296-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenblatt, P. C., & Cunningham, M. R. (1976). Television watching and family tensions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 105–111.  https://doi.org/10.2307/350554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryff, C. D., & Almeida, D. M. (2010). National survey of midlife in the United States (MIDUS II): Daily Stress Project, 20042009. ICPSR26841-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 02-26.Google Scholar
  43. Ryff, C., Almeida, D. M., Ayanian, J. S., Carr, D. S., Cleary, P. D., Coe, C., et al. (2007). Midlife development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004–2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  44. Selcuk, E., Gunaydin, G., Ong, A. D., & Almeida, D. A. (2016). Does partner responsiveness predict hedonic and eudaimonic well-being? A 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 311–325.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Selcuk, E., Zayas, V., Gunaydin, G., Hazan, C., & Kross, E. (2012). Mental representations of attachment figures facilitate emotional recovery following upsetting autobiographical memory recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 362–378.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270–1279.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Slatcher, R. B., & Selcuk, E. (2017). A social psychological perspective on the links between close relationships and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416667444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taquet, M., Quoidbach, J., de Montjoye, Y. A., Desseilles, M., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(35), 9769–9773.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519998113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tasfiliz, D., Selcuk, E., Gunaydin, G., Slatcher, R. B., Corriero, E., & Ong, A. D. (2018). Cultural patterns of partner responsiveness and well-being in Japan and the United States. Journal of Family Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thinkbox. (2013). Screen life: TV in demand. Retrieved from Thinkbox website: https://www.thinkbox.tv/Research/Thinkbox-research/Screen-Life-TV-in-demand. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  51. Tkach, C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How do people pursue happiness? Relating personality, happiness-increasing strategies and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 183–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-4754-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsai, J. L. (2007). Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 242–259.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B. K., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 288–307.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ye, Y. (2010). Beyond materialism: The role of health-related beliefs in the relationship between television viewing and life satisfaction among college students. Mass Communication and Society, 13(4), 458–478.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBilkent UniversityBilkentTurkey
  2. 2.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations