Children’s Wellbeing at School: A Multi-dimensional and Multi-informant Approach
Based on a multi-dimensional model of wellbeing in school that includes psychological, cognitive and social components, the aim of this investigation was to (a) analyse differences based on gender and school level (primary or middle school) in children’s subjective reports of their school wellbeing, (b) analyse correlates of subjective school wellbeing considering learning skills, grades and behavioural problems, and (c) investigate parents’ and teachers’ personal experiences and observations related to children with a low level of subjective school wellbeing. The sample comprised 1038 third- to eighth-grade students who completed the Questionnaire on School Wellbeing (QBS; Tobia and Marzocchi in QBS 8-13. Questionari per la valutazione del benessere scolastico e identificazione dei fattori di rischio [QBS 8-13. Questionnaires for the evaluation of school wellbeing and the identification of risk factors], Erickson, Trento, 2015a), which investigates the gratification obtained by results in school, relationships with teachers and classmates, emotional attitude towards school, and self-efficacy. The results showed significant gender differences (e.g., a better relationship with teachers but a poorer emotional attitude towards school for girls) and lower scores on school wellbeing in middle school students compared to primary school students. Among primary school students, wellbeing tended to be positively influenced by learning skills, whereas it was positively influenced by grades and negatively influenced by behavioural problems among middle school students. Finally, both parents and teachers of children with low levels of school wellbeing described greater feelings of worry, guilt, and tension in relation to the children’s difficulties. Parents reported more learning and emotional difficulties in these children, whereas teachers reported lower self-awareness. These results may offer insights to inform school policies and interventions aimed at improving children’s wellbeing.
KeywordsSchool wellbeing Child wellbeing Primary school Middle school Multi-informant questionnaire
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was conducted in a manner consistent with the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles (1982) and the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent was obtained from participants.
- Al-Yagon, M., & Margalit, M. (2012). Parental coping, emotional resources, and children’s adjustment: Theory, empirical evidence, and interventional implications. In B. Molinelli & V. Grimaldo (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of coping: New research (pp. 59–84). New York, NY: Nova.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2000). Autoefficacia, Teoria e Applicazioni [Self-efficacy, Theories and applications]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
- Bracken, B. A. (1996). TRI. Test delle Relazioni Interpersonali [TRI. Test of Interpersonal Relationships]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
- Breeman, L. D., Wubbels, T., Van Lier, P. A. C., Verhulst, F. C., van der Ende, J., Maras, A., et al. (2015). Teacher characteristics, social classroom relationships, and children’s social, emotional, and behavioral classroom adjustment in special education. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1998). Prove di Lettura MT per la Scuola Elementare [Tests of reading MT for primary school]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
- Cornoldi, C., Lucangeli, D., & Bellina, M. (2002). AC-MT. Test di Valutazione delle Abilità di Calcolo [AC-MT. Test for the assessment of calculation skills]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G. J., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2001). Welfare reform and children’s wellbeing. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The New world of welfare (pp. 391–420). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Fox, A., Duerr Berrick, J., & Frash, K. (2008). Safety, family, permanency, and child wellbeing: What we can learn from children. Child Welfare, 87, 63–90.Google Scholar
- Gutman, L., Brown, J., Akerman, R., & Obolenskaya, P. (2010). Change in wellbeing from childhood to adolescence: Risk and resilience [Wider Benefits of Learning Research Report No. 34].Google Scholar
- Hascher, T., & Hagenauer, G. (2011). Schulisches Wohlbefinden im Jugendalter—Verläufe und Einflussfaktoren [Scholastic wellbeing in adolescence-Courses and influencing factors]. In A. Ittel, H. Merkens, & L. Stecher (Eds.), Jahrbuch Jugendforschung (pp. 15–45). Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
- McLaughlin, C., & Clarke, B. (2010). Relational matters: A review of the impact of school experience on mental health in early adolescence. Educational and Child Psychology, 27(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus User’s Guide 2010. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Pople, L., & Mainstone-Cotton, S. (2014). Children’s wellbeing. In S. Hay (Ed.), Early years education and care: New issues for practice from research (pp. 59–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Roffey, S. (2010). Classroom support for including students with challenging behavior. In R. Rose (Ed.), Confronting obstacles to inclusion: International responses to developing inclusive education (pp. 279–292). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rotsika, V., Coccossis, M., Vlassopoulos, M., Papaeleftheriou, E., Sakellariou, K., Anagnostopoulos, D. C., et al. (2011). Does the subjective quality of life of children with specific learning disabilities (SpLD) agree with their parents’ proxy reports? Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1271–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rumberger, R. & Lim, S.-A. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research. California Dropout Research Project, Policy Brief 15. Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
- Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issue of gender in elementary and secondary education. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 17, pp. 269–334). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2015a). QBS 8-13. Questionari per la valutazione del benessere scolastico e identificazione dei fattori di rischio [QBS 8-13. Questionnaires for the evaluation of school wellbeing and the identification of risk factors]. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
- Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2015b). Il benessere scolastico nella scuola primaria e secondaria di I grado: Una ricerca su bambini con sviluppo tipico e con Bisogni Educativi Speciali [School wellness in primary and middle school: A study of children with typical development and with special needs]. Difficoltà di Apprendimento e Didattica Inclusiva, 3(2), 221–232.Google Scholar
- Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., & Lane, M. M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(34), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(2), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Issues, concepts, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (2003). Creating an environment for emotional and social wellbeing: An important responsibility of a health promoting and child-friendly school. WHO/SCHOOL/03.10. Information series on school health. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar