Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1151–1174 | Cite as

The Role of Workers’ Motivational Profiles in Affective and Organizational Factors

  • Nicolas Gillet
  • Evelyne Fouquereau
  • Robert J. Vallerand
  • Jocelyne Abraham
  • Philippe Colombat
Research Paper

Abstract

We used latent profile analyses to understand how the different forms of motivation proposed by self-determination theory combine with each other and how they relate to some organizational factors (i.e., perceived organizational support and procedural justice) and well-and ill-being indicators (i.e., work engagement, quality of working life, work satisfaction, job anxiety, and burnout). The research draws upon quantitative data collected by means of a questionnaire that was administered to 328 employees (Study 1) and 521 employees (Study 2) from various French companies. Results revealed that workers characterized by the two most autonomous motivational profiles displayed higher levels of work engagement, quality of working life, and work satisfaction, and lower levels of burnout and job anxiety than those with low levels of autonomous motivation, and introjected and external regulations (Low AU/INR/EXR profile), and those with moderate levels of autonomous motivation, moderate to high levels of introjected regulation, and moderate levels of external regulation (Mod AU/INR/EXR profile in Study 1 and Mod AU–High INR–Mod EXR profile in Study 2). Of interest is that the High AU–Low INR/EXR and High AU/INR–Low EXR profiles did not differ on well- and ill-being. In addition, perceived organizational support and procedural justice were associated with a greater probability of belonging to the High AU–Low INR/EXR and High AU/INR–Low EXR profiles, taking the Low AU/INR/EXR profile as a referent. The present research contributes towards a better understanding of the links between workers’ motivational profiles and affective and organizational factors.

Keywords

Motivational profiles Self-determination theory Autonomous and controlled motivation Well- and ill-being 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1993). What does a theory of creativity require? Psychological Inquiry, 4, 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlin, K. S., Williams, N. A., & Parra, G. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., Oliveira-Cruz, F., & Lopes, S. (2015). Work context support and Portuguese soldiers’ well-being: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Military Psychology, 27, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chemolli, E., & Gagné, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. B. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elizur, D., & Shye, S. (1990). Quality of work life and its relation to quality of life. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., et al. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillet, N., Berjot, S., & Paty, E. (2010). Profils motivationnels et ajustement au travail : Vers une approche intra-individuelle de la motivation [Motivational profiles and work adjustment: Toward an intra-individual approach of motivation]. Le Travail Humain: A Bilingual and Multi-Disciplinary Journal in Human Factors, 73, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillet, N., Berjot, S., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, S., & Rosnet, E. (2012). Examining the motivation-performance relationship in competitive sport: A cluster-analytic approach. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43, 79–102.Google Scholar
  23. Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graves, L. M., Cullen, K. L., Lester, H. F., Ruderman, M. N., & Gentry, W. A. (2015). Managerial motivational profiles: Composition, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. He, H., Zhu, W., & Zheng, X. (2014). Procedural justice and employee engagement: Roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jansen in de Wal, J., den Brok, P. J., Hooijer, J. G., Martens, R. L., & van den Beemt, A. (2014). Teachers’ engagement in professional learning: Exploring motivational profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, A., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2015). The mediating roles of leader–member exchange and perceived organizational support in the role stress–turnover intention relationship among child welfare workers: A longitudinal analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 52, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koestner, R., & Losier, G. F. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being internally motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 101–121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206315575554.
  31. Kyndt, E., Coertjens, L., van Daal, T., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). The development of students’ motivation in the transition from secondary to higher education: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linden, M., Muschalla, B., & Olbrich, D. (2008). Die Job-Angst-Skala (JAS): Ein fragebogen zur erfassung arbeitsplatzbezogener ängste [The Job Anxiety Scale (JAS): The development of a new instrument for the assessment of workplace-related anxieties]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2001). Latent class factor and cluster models, bi-plots, and related graphical displays. Sociological Methodology, 31, 223–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to the internal/external frame of reference model. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T.-Y., & Liu, Z.-Q. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morin, A. J. S., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Disentangling shape from level effects in person-centered analyses: An illustration based on university teachers’ multidimensional profiles of effectiveness. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morin, A. J. S., Morizot, J., Boudrias, J.-S., & Madore, I. (2011). A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 58–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  40. Navarro, J., Curioso, F., Gomes, D., Arrieta, C., & Cortés, M. (2013). Fluctuations in work motivation: Tasks do not matter! Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 17, 3–22.Google Scholar
  41. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parker, S. L., Jimmieson, N. L., & Amiot, C. E. (2010). Self-determination as a moderator of demands and control: Implications for employee strain and engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roe, R. A. (2014). Time, performance and motivation. In A. J. Shipp & Y. Fried (Eds.), Time and work, Vol. 1: How time impacts individuals. Current issues in work and organizational psychology (pp. 63–110). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  47. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheldon, K. M., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Positive psychology and self-determination theory: A natural interface. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 33–44). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shirom, A., & Melamed, S. (2006). A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures in two groups of professionals. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tremblay, M., Cloutier, J., Simard, G., Chênevert, D., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). The role of HRM practices, procedural justice, organizational support and trust in organizational commitment and in-role and extra-role performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 405–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271–360). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  54. van Beek, I., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 468–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van den Berghe, L., Soenens, B., Aelterman, N., Cardon, G., Tallir, I. B., & Haerens, L. (2014). Within-person profiles of teachers’ motivation to teach: Associations with need satisfaction at work, need-supportive teaching, and burnout. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van den Broeck, A., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Van Coillie, H. (2013). Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers’ motivation for well-being: A person-centered perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Emmerik, H., Jawahar, I. M., & Stone, T. H. (2005). Associations among altruism, burnout dimensions, and organizational citizenship behavior. Work & Stress, 19, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang, H.-J., Lu, C.-Q., & Siu, O.-L. (2015). Job insecurity and job performance: The moderating role of organizational justice and the mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1249–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zapata-Phelan, C. P., Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & Livingston, B. (2009). Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zaslavsky, O., Cochrane, B., Herting, J. R., Thompson, H., Woods, N. F., & LaCroix, A. (2014). Application of person-centered analytic methodology in longitudinal research: exemplars from the women’s health initiative clinical trial data. Research in Nursing & Health, 37, 53–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Gillet
    • 1
  • Evelyne Fouquereau
    • 1
  • Robert J. Vallerand
    • 2
  • Jocelyne Abraham
    • 3
  • Philippe Colombat
    • 3
  1. 1.EA 2114 Psychologie des Âges de la Vie (PAV), Département de psychologie, UFR Arts et Sciences HumainesUniversité François-Rabelais de ToursTours Cedex 1France
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement SocialUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.EA 6296 VAL de LOire REcherche en Management (VALLOREM)Université François-Rabelais de ToursToursFrance

Personalised recommendations