Are Women Happier When Their Spouse is Teleworker?
- 120 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
This study explores the household production allocation and happiness of women when their spouse is teleworker using data from the British Household Panel Survey over the years 1991–2009. The study aims to answer whether the women spend additional time on housework and are happier when they or their partner is teleworker. Also, we explore whether are happier when they share the household–domestic production with their partners. Fixed effects estimates take place, and we consider a Bayesian Network framework and a directed acyclic graph for causal inference. The results show that women are more likely to state that the household allocation, such as cooking, cleaning, ironing and childcare is shared when their partner teleworks. Shopping is an exception which can be regarded as an outdoor activity while one partner may be mainly responsible for this chore. In addition, women are happier when they or their spouse is teleworker, and they report higher levels of happiness when the household production allocation is a shared process. This may indicate men teleworkers may contribute extra to the household production releasing a burden for the partners and improving their well-being.
Keywords
Bayesian Networks Directed acyclic graphs Gender roles Household production Quality-of-life TeleworkingNotes
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (IF) Grant [652938-TELE]. The author gratefully acknowledges the funding provided by European Commission to carry out this research. The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, suggestions and constructive comments that greatly contributed to the improvement of the quality of this paper.
References
- Anderson, G., Brosnan, P., & Walsh, P. (1994). Homeworking in New Zealand: Results from a workplace survey. International Journal of Employment Studies, 2, 229–247.Google Scholar
- Anderson, A. J., Kaplan, S. A., & Vega, R. P. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2007). Shift work, parenting behaviors, and children’s socioemotional well-being: A within-family study. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 727–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barnett, R., & Rivers, C. (1996). She works, he works: How two-income families are happy, healthy, and thriving. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Baxter, J. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34, 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, O., & Sullivan, O. (1996). The importance of difference: Conceptualising increased flexibility in gender relations in the home. Sociological Review, 44(2), 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016). The role of organizational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., & Chiappori, P. A. (2009). Efficient intra-household allocations and distributions factors: Implications and identification. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, H., & Roberts, J. (2014). Gender role identity, breadwinner status and psychological well-being in the household. Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series SERPS No. 2014004, Institute for Economic Analysis of Decision-Making.Google Scholar
- Browning, M., Chiappori, P. A., & Weiss, Y. (2014). Economics of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bulos, M., & Chaker, W. (1995). Sustaining a sense of home and personal identity. In D. Benjamin & D. Stea (Eds.), The home: Interpretations, meanings and environments. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
- Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chiappori, P. A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, A. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4, 341–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labour and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dauphin, A., El Lhaga, A., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (2011). Are children decision-makers within the household? Economic Journal, 121, 871–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 336–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giovanis, E. (2014). Relationship between well-being and recycling rates: Evidence from life satisfaction approach in Britain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the GHQ. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
- Golden, T. D. (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommutings differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home?’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1340–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goossens, R. C., & de Vos, E. L. (1987). Huishoudvoering met een laag inkomen: Theoretische aanzetten voor de bestudering van strategieën in het huishoudelijk handelen bij beleidsminima. Vakgroep Huishoudkunde: Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen.Google Scholar
- Greenhill, A., & Wilson, M. (2006). Haven or hell? Telework, flexibility and family in the e-society: A Marxist analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gregson, N., & Lowe, M. (1994). Waged domestic labour and the renegotiation of the domestic division of labour within dual career households. Sociology, 28, 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, home production, and work—The theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1099–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Han, W. J. (2004). Nonstandard work schedules and child care decisions: Evidence from the NICHD study of early child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heckerman, D. (1996). Tutorial on learning Bayesian networks. Technical Report MSR-TR-95-06. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/heckerman95tutorial.html.
- Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (1994). Housework, wages, and the division of housework time for employed spouses. The American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 84(2), 120–125.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
- Huws, U., Podro, S., Gunnarsson, E., Weijers, T., Arvanitaki, K., & Trova, V. (1996) Teleworking and Gender. Report 317, Institute for Employment Studies.Google Scholar
- Ilahi, N. (2000). The intra-household allocation of time and tasks: what have we learnt from the empirical literature? The World Bank Development Research Group/Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network.Google Scholar
- Kalisch, M., & Buhlmann, P. (2007). Estimating high-dimensional directed acyclic graphs with ¨ the PC-algorithm. Machine Learning, 8, 613–636.Google Scholar
- Levinson, A. (2012). Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9–10), 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lim, V. K. G.,Thompson, T. H., & Har, W. S. (1997). Working at home-Myth or reality: An empirical study of factors affecting attitudes towards teleworking. Research Paper Series, Faculty of Business Administration, National University of Singapore, 1997.Google Scholar
- Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Madsen, S. R. (2006). Work and family conflict: Can home-based teleworking make a difference? International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(3), 307–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mansfield, P., & Collard, J. (1988). The beginning of the rest of your life? A portrait of newly-wed marriage. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mazzocco, M., Ruiz, C., & Yamaguchi, S. (2013). Labor supply, wealth dynamics, and marriage decisions. Mimeo: University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Morris, L. (1993). Household finance management and the labour market: a case study in Hartlepool. Sociological Review, 41(3), 506–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neapolitan, R. (2003). Learning Bayesian networks. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence, Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Nichols, S., & Metzen, E. (1982). Impact of wife’s employment upon husband’s housework. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oláh, L. S., Richter, R., & Kotowska, I. E. (2014). State-of-the-art report. The new roles of men and women and implications for families and societies. Families and societies. Working Paper Series. Changing families and sustainable societies: Policy contexts and diversity over the life course and across generation.Google Scholar
- Ozdamar, O. (2015a). Does public spending on parental leave benefits promote child health? Evidence from panel data analyses of OECD countries. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 32–49.Google Scholar
- Ozdamar, O. (2015b). Gendered economic policy making: The case of public expenditures on family allowances. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2015-37, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Google Scholar
- Pahl, J. (1983). The allocation of money and the structuring of inequality within marriage. Sociological Review, 31(2), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. California: San Mateo.Google Scholar
- Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pearl, J. (2009). Causal inference in statistics: An overview. Statistical Surveys, 3, 96–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pennartz, P., & Niehof, A. (1999). The domestic domain: Chances, choices and strategies of family households. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Pina, D., & Bengston, V. (1993). The division of household labor and wives’ happiness: Ideology, employment and perceptions of support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 901–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silver, H. (1993). Homework and domestic work. Sociological Forum, 8(2), 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sironi, M., & Mencarini, L. (2012). Happiness, housework and gender inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, O. (2000). The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change? Sociology, 34, 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001). Home-Based telework, gender and the synchronization of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents. Gender, Work and Organization, 8(2), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2010). British household panel survey user manual volume A introduction, technical report and appendices. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
- Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Soest, A. (1995). Structural models of family labor supply: A discrete choice approach. Journal of Human Resources, 30(1), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Soest, S., & Stancanelli, E. (2010). Does income taxation affect partners’ household chores? IZA Discussion Paper No. 5038, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- Vega, R. P., Anderson, A. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015). A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vittersø, J., Akselsen, S., Evjemo, B., Julsrud, T. E., Yttri, B., & Bergvik, S. (2004). Impacts of home-based telework on quality of life for employees and their partners. Quantitative and qualitative results from a European survey. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vogler, C., & Pahl, J. (1993). Social and economic change and the organisation of money within marriage. Work, Employment & Society, 7(1), 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vogler, C., & Pahl, J. (1994). Money, power and inequality within marriage. Sociological Review, 42(2), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Voydanoff, P., & Donnelly, B. W. (1999). The intersection of time in activities and perceived unfairness in relation to psychological distress and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the “family gap” in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warde, A., & Hetherington, K. (1993). A changing domestic division of labour? Issues of measurement and interpretation. Work, Employment & Society, 7, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wheelock, J. (1990). Husbands at home: The domestic economy in a post-industrial society. Londen: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wight, V. R., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2008). Time for children, one’s spouse and oneself among parents who work nonstandard hours. Social Forces, 87, 243–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zuidberg, A. C. L. (1981). Het verzorgingsniveau van huishoudens. SWOKA Onderzoeksrapporten, 4. ‘s-Gravenhage: SWOKA.Google Scholar