Is Cohabitation As Good As Marriage for People’s Subjective Well-Being? Longitudinal Evidence on Happiness and Life Satisfaction in the British Household Panel Survey
This study investigates changes in happiness and life satisfaction associated with transitions into cohabitation and marriage in 12 waves from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) collected between 1997 and 2009. Theory suggests that happiness is an emotional state that is linked to one’s physiological reactions to life events, whereas satisfaction is a cognitive evaluation that also depends on social comparisons with other important reference groups as well as the individual’s desires, expectations and hopes. A longitudinal (fixed effects) analysis that controls for time-invariant variation in subjective well-being indicates that entering cohabitation is as beneficial for people’s happiness as entering marriage. Entering marriage is slightly more satisfying than cohabitation but only among previously never-married individuals. This is true for men and women and across age and cohorts. These findings indicate that cohabitation provides similar benefits to marriage with regard to happiness but not how previously never married individuals view their overall satisfaction with their lives.
KeywordsCohabitation Marriage Satisfaction Happiness Longitudinal data
- Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.). (2008). The science of subjective wellbeing. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: trends, issues and implications. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children and social policy (pp. 3–31). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lynn, P. L. (2006). Quality profile: British household panel survey. Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.Google Scholar
- ONS. (2012). Cohabitation in the UK 2012. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- ONS. (2015). Families and households, 2015. Statistical bulletin. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Stata (2007). Which references should I cite when using the vce (cluster clustvar) option to obtain Stata’s cluster-correlated robust estimate of variance? Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/references.
- Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition (population bulletin 42). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
- Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar