Enhancing a Sense of Competence at Work by Engaging in Proactive Behavior: The Role of Proactive Personality
- 223 Downloads
To understand how individuals’ senses of competence are cultivated, scholars have primarily focused on situational factors such as job autonomy and supervisor support. Against this backdrop, we propose that individuals can work as active agents and enhance their sense of competence by initiating actions that aim to master the environment. We adopt the behavioral concordance model and propose that people higher in proactive personality are more likely to engage in proactive behavior that elevates their senses of competence over time. We further propose that such behavioral concordance contributes to boosting a sense of competence is more prominent among those with higher proactive personality. Our predictions are supported by data from 172 employees and their direct supervisors in China, after controlling for the effect of job autonomy and supervisor support for autonomy. Specifically, only those higher in proactive personality engaged in more proactive behavior and increased their sense of competence over time. This study highlights both a self-initiated and a behavioral perspective on understanding the development of a sense of competence.
KeywordsProactive behavior Proactive personality Latent change score Sense of competence
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) for sponsoring this research (Project 71202148).
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudra (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behaviour (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Chen, W.-Y., Gan, Y.-Q., Guo, Z.-L., Nie, H.-Y., Feng, Y., & Liu, Z.-X. (2014). The relationship between meaning thinking and job burnout from a self-determination perspective. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 642–662.Google Scholar
- Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
- Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 133–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Slegers, D. W. (2006). Methods for the analysis of change. In D. K. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development. Lawrence: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar