Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 277–295 | Cite as

Depression, Positive and Negative Affect, Optimism and Health-Related Quality of Life in Recently Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis Patients: The Role of Identity, Sense of Coherence, and Self-efficacy

  • Emanuela Calandri
  • Federica Graziano
  • Martina Borghi
  • Silvia Bonino
Research Paper
  • 537 Downloads

Abstract

The study aimed to describe the levels of depression, positive and negative affect, optimism and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a group of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (up to 3 years since the diagnosis), taking into account gender, age, and disease duration differences, and to investigate the possible role of identity, sense of coherence (SOC), and self-efficacy in MS (SEMS) on patients’ depression, positive and negative affect, optimism, and HRQOL. The cross-sectional study involved 90 MS patients (61% women; age: M = 37, SD = 12) with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score between 1 and 4 (mild to moderate disability). Patients completed measures of depression (CESD-10), positive and negative affect (PANAS), optimism (LOT-R), HRQOL (SF-12), identity motives, SOC, and SEMS. Depression scores were near the cut-off level for clinically significant depressive symptoms, and negative affect was higher and HRQOL was lower than those in the general population. Women and younger patients reported better adjustment as time passes since the diagnosis. Results of multiple regressions indicated that higher SOC was related to higher mental health, lower negative affect and lower depression. Higher SEMS was predictive of greater positive affect and lower negative affect, whereas higher identity satisfaction was predictive of higher positive affect and optimism and lower depression. The results suggest the usefulness of addressing identity redefinition, SOC and self-efficacy in psychological interventions aimed at promoting patients’ adjustment to MS.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis Health-related quality of life Optimism Positive and negative affect Self-efficacy Sense of coherence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients of the CRESM (Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre) Torino, Italy, who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the Cosso Foundation, Pinerolo, Torino (Italy).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Amato, M. P., & Zipoli, V. (2004). Disturbi psichiatrici [Psychiatric disorders]. Milano: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Apolone, G., Mosconi, P., Quattrociocchi, L., Gianicolo, E. A. L., Groth, N., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2005). Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-12. Versione italiana [SF-12 questionnaire. Italian version]. Milano: IRFMN.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  5. Barni, D., & Tagliabue, S. (2005). Sense of Coherence Scale di Antonovsky: un contributo alla validazione italiana [Antonovsky’s “Sense of Coherence Scale”: A contribution to the Italian validation]. Testing, Psicometria, Metodologia, 12 (3), 151–166. http://hdl.handle.net/10807/10345
  6. Bassi, M., Falautano, M., Cilia, S., Goretti, B., Grobberio, M., Pattini, M., et al. (2014). The coexistence of well- and ill-being in persons with multiple sclerosis, their caregivers and health professionals. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 337, 67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boeije, H. R., Duijnnstee, M. S. H., Grypdonck, M. H. F., & Pool, A. (2002). Encountering the downward phase: biographical work in people with multiple sclerosis living at home. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 881–893. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00238-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonino, S. (2006). Mille fili mi legano qui. Vivere la malattia [A thousand threads tie me here. Living with illness]. Bari-Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
  9. Bonino, S. (2010). Vivre avec la maladie chronique: les questions fondamentales que le patient doit aborder [Living with chronic illness: the fundamental questions that the patient needs to address]. In AA.VV. Modèles et pratiques en éducation du patient: apports internationaux [Patient education models and practices: international contributions.] (pp. 64-71). Paris: INPES.Google Scholar
  10. Bonino, S., Graziano, F., Borghi, M., Marengo, D., Molinengo, G., & Calandri, E. (2016). The self-efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (SEMS) Scale: development and validation with Rasch analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000350.Google Scholar
  11. Bosma, H., & Kunnen, S. (2001). Identity and emotion. Development through self-organization. Paris: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breakwell, G. (1983). Threatened identities. Chichester, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan, R. J., Chakravorty, B. J., Tyry, T., Hatcher, W., & Vollmer, T. (2009). Age-related comparisons of people with multiple sclerosis: Demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics. NeuroRehabilitation, 25(271–278), 271. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0525.Google Scholar
  14. Calandri, E., Graziano, F., Borghi, M., & Bonino, S. (2016). Depressione e benessere psicologico in persone con sclerosi multipla: il ruolo dell’identità, del senso di coerenza e dell’autoefficacia [Depression and psychological well-being in people with multiple sclerosis: the role of identity, sense of coherence and self-efficacy]. Psicologia della Salute, 1, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). Optimism and health-related cognition: What variables actually matter? Psychology and Health, 9, 191–195. doi: 10.1080/08870449408407478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiesi, F., Galli, S., Primi, C., Innocenti Borgi, P., & Bonacchi, A. (2013). The accuracy of the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT–R) in measuring dispositional optimism: evidence from item response theory analyses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(5), 523–529. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.781029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennison, L., & Moss-Morris, R. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy: What benefits can it offer people with multiple sclerosis? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutic, s10(9), 1383–1390. doi: 10.1586/ern.10.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dennison, L., Moss-Morris, R., & Chalder, T. (2009). A review of psychological correlates of adjustment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dennison, L., Moss-Morris, R., Silber, E., Galea, I., & Chalder, T. (2010). Cognitive and behavioural correlates of different domains of psychological adjustment in early-stage multiple sclerosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 353–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Eriksson, M., & Lindstrom, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 376–381. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.041616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 249–251. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2%3C249:AID-JCLP2270390218%3E3.0.CO;2-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feinstein, A. (2011). Multiple sclerosis and depression. Multiple Sclerosis, 17(11), 1276–1281. doi: 10.1177/1352458511417835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fournier, M., de Ridder, D., & Bensing, J. (2002). Optimism and adaptation to chronic disease: the role of optimism in relation to self-care options of type 1 diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 409–432. doi: 10.1348/135910702320645390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fournier, M., de Ridder, D., & Bensing, J. (2003). Is optimism sensitive to the stressors of chronic disease? The impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus and multiple sclerosis on optimistic beliefs. Psychology and Health, 18(3), 277–294. doi: 10.1080/0887044031000062197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fraser, C., & Polito, S. (2007). A comparative study of self-efficacy in men and women with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 39(2), 102–106. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200704000-00006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giordano, A., Granella, F., Lugaresi, A., Martinelli, V., Trojano, M., Confalonieri, P., et al. (2011). Anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis patients around diagnosis. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 307, 86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gottberg, K., Einarsson, U., Fredrikson, S., von Koch, L., & Holmqvist, L. W. (2007). A population-based study of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis in Stockholm county: Association with functioning and sense of coherence. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 78(1), 60–65. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.090654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graziano, F., Calandri, E., Borghi, M., & Bonino, S. (2014). The effects of a group-based cognitive behavioral therapy on people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28, 264–274. doi: 10.1177/0269215513501525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hart, S. L., Vella, L., & Mohr, D. C. (2008). Relationships among depressive symptoms, benefit-finding, optimism, and positive affect in multiple sclerosis patients after psychotherapy for depression. Health Psychology, 27(2), 230–238. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hendry, L. B., & Kloep, M. (2002). Lifespan development. Resources, challenges and risks. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  32. Irvine, H., Davidson, C., Hoy, K., & Lowe-Strong, A. (2009). Psychosocial adjustment to multiple sclerosis: exploration of identity redefinition. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(8), 599–606. doi: 10.1080/09638280802243286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Janssen, A. C. J. W., van Doorn, P. A., de Boer, J. B., van der Meché, F. G. A., Passchier, J., & Hintzen, R. Q. (2003). Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression, and distress of patients and partners. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 108, 389–395. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00166.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, K. H., Ford, D. V., Jones, P. A., John, A., Middleton, R. M., Lockart-Jones, H., et al. (2012). A large-scale study of anxiety and depression in people with multiple sclerosis: A survey via the Web Portal of the UK MS Register. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e41910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klevan, G., Farbu, E., Jacobsen, C. O., Aarseth, J. H., Myhr, K. M., Nyland, H., et al. (2014). Health related quality of life in patients recently diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 129, 21–26. doi: 10.1111/ane.12142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33(11), 1444–1452. doi: 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lode, K., Bru, E., Klevan, G., Myhr, K. M., Nyland, H., & Larsen, J. P. (2009). Depressive symptoms and coping in newly diagnosed patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 15, 638–643. doi: 10.1177/1352458509102313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manzi, C., Vignoles, V. L., & Regalia, C. (2010). Accommodating a new identity: Possible selves, identity change and well-being across two life-transitions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 970–984. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCabe, M., & McKern, S. (2002). Quality of life and multiple sclerosis: Comparison between people with multiple sclerosis and people from the general population. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 9(4), 287–295. doi: 10.1023/A:1020734901150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCabe, M., McKern, S., & McDonald, E. (2004). Coping and psychological adjustment among people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56, 355–361. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00132-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, A., & Dishon, S. (2006). Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the impact of disability, gender and employment status. Quality of Life Research, 15, 259–271. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0891-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pakenham, K. I. (2007). Making sense of multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52(4), 380–389. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.52.4.380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pakenham, K. I., & Cox, S. (2009). The dimensional structure of benefit finding in multiple sclerosis and relations with positive and negative adjustment: A longitudinal study. Psychology and Health, 24(4), 373–393. doi: 10.1080/08870440701832592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pakenham, K. I., & Fleming, M. (2011). Relations between acceptance of multiple sclerosis and positive and negative adjustments. Psychology and Health, 26(10), 1292–1309. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.517838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patten, S. B., Berzins, S., & Metz, L. M. (2010). Challenges in screening for depression in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 16(11), 1406–1411. doi: 10.1177/1352458510377770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sà, M. J. (2008). Psychological aspects of multiple sclerosis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 110, 868–877. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmitt, M. M., Goverover, Y., Deluca, J., & Chiaravalloti, N. (2014). Self-efficacy as a predictor of self-reported physical, cognitive, and social functioning in multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(1), 27–34. doi: 10.1037/a0035288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sellner, J., Kraus, J., Awad, A., Milo, R., Hemmer, B., & Stuve, O. (2011). The increasing incidence and prevalence of female multiple sclerosis—A critical analysis of potential environmental factors. Autoimmunity Reviews, 10(8), 495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sinnakaruppan, I., Macdonald, K., McCafferty, A., & Mattison, P. (2010). An exploration of the relationship between perception of control, physical disability, optimism, self-efficacy and hopelessness in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 33, 26–33. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32832e6b16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solari, A., Filippini, G., Mendozzi, L., Ghezzi, A., Cifani, S., Barbieri, E., et al. (1999). Validation of Italian multiple sclerosis quality of life 54 questionnaire. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 67(2), 158–162. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.2.158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Symister, P., & Friend, R. (2003). The influence of social support and problematic support on optimism and depression in chronic illness: A prospective study evaluating self-esteem as a mediator. Health Psychology, 22(2), 123–129. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tan-Kristanto, S., & Kiropoulos, L. A. (2015). Resilience, self-efficacy, coping style and depressive and anxiety symptoms in those newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 20(6), 635–645. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.999810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 131–141. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Treadaway, K., Cutter, G., Salter, A., Lynch, S., Simsarian, J., Corboy, J., et al. (2009). Factors that influence adherence with disease-modifying therapy in MS. Journal of Neurology, 256(4), 568–576. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-0096-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weinreich, P., & Saunderson, W. (2003). Analysing identity: Cross-cultural, societal and clinical contexts. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Wikman, A., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2011). Quality of life and affective well-being in middle-aged and older people with chronic medical illnesses: A cross-sectional population based study. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e18952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Cosso FoundationPinerolo, TurinItaly
  3. 3.Neurology 2 - CRESM (Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre)San Luigi Gonzaga HospitalOrbassanoItaly

Personalised recommendations