Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 231–256 | Cite as

Work Locus of Control, Motivational Regulation, Employee Work Passion, and Work Intentions: An Empirical Investigation of an Appraisal Model

  • Drea Zigarmi
  • Fred J. Galloway
  • Taylor Peyton Roberts
Research Paper

Abstract

In accordance with appraisal theory, relationships among four psychological constructs within an individual are examined: work-specific locus of control, motivational regulation, work passion, and work intentions. A survey was administered electronically to a database of working professionals, and 2654 responses were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Locus of control variables were significantly related to all three forms of motivational regulation in employees. Three of the five possible relationships between forms of motivational regulation and work passion variables were found to be significant, in part supporting the importance of autonomous regulation to both harmonious passion and obsessive passion in the employee appraisal process. Partial mediation testing indicated that internal locus of control directly contributed somewhat to harmonious passion, and the same was found to be true for external locus of control and obsessive passion. Both work passion variables predicted work intentions, but stronger relationships were found between harmonious passion and work intentions. Findings and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Work locus of control Motivational outlook Work passion Work intentions Appraisal theory 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, S. L. (2010). Handbook of employee engagement: perspectives, issues, research and practice. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 178–204. doi: 10.2307/2786945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bing, M. N., Whanger, J. C., Davison, H. K., & VanHook, J. B. (2004). Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect impersonality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonneville-Roussy, A., Vallerand, R. J., & Bouffard, T. (2013). The roles of autonomy support harmonious and obsessive passion in educational persistence. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chau, H., & Hocevar, D. (1995, April). The effects of number of measured variables on goodness-of-fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Curran, T., Hill, E. P., Appleton, P. R., Vallerand, R. J., & Standage, M. (2015). The psychology of passion: A meta-analytic review of a decade of research on intrapersonal outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 231–655. doi: 10.1007/s11031-015-9503-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). The general causality orientation scale: Self-determination and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deng, H., Guan, Y., Bond, M. H., Zhang, Z., & Hu, T. (2011). The interplay between social cynicism beliefs and person-organization fit on work-related attitudes among Chinese employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 160–178.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy, R. D., & Lent, R. W. (2009). Test of the social cognitive model of work satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferguson, E. (1993). Rotter’s locus of control scale: A 10 item 2 factor model. Psychological Reports, 73, 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Sarrazin, C., & Morin, E. M. (2011). “Work is my passion”: The different affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of harmonious and obsessive passion toward work. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 27–40. doi: 10.1002/CJAS.170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fugate, M., Harrison, S., & Kinicki, A. J. (2011). Thoughts and feelings about organizational change: A field test of appraisal theory. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18, 421–437. doi: 10.1177/1548051811416510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furnham, A., & Steele, H. (1993). Measuring locus of control: A critique of general, children’s, health- and work-related locus of control questionnaires. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 443–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi: 10.1002/job.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gagne, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aube, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628–646. doi: 10.1177/0013164409355698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gousse-Lessard, A. S., Vallerand, R. J., Carbonneau, N., & Lafreniere, M. K. (2013). the role of passion in mainstream and radical behaviors: A look at environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grebner, S., Semmer, K., & Elfering, A. (2005). Working conditions and three types of well-being: A longitudinal study with self-report and rating data. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heckhausen, H., & Beckmann, J. (1990). Intentional action and action slips. Psychological Review, 97, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ho, V. T., Wong, S., & Lee, C. H. (2011). A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 26–47. doi: 10.111/j.1467-6486.2009.00878.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holtz, B. C., Ployhart, R. E., & Dominguez, A. (2005). Testing the rules of justice: The effects of frame-of-reference and pre-test validity information on personality test responses and test perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: explorations into the measurement of learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kemery, E. R., & Dunlap, W. P. (1986). Partialling factor scores does not control method variance: A reply to Podsakoff and Tudor. Journal of Management, 12, 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect on the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kormanik, M. B., & Rocco, T. S. (2009). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review of the locus of construct. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 463–483. doi: 10.1177/1534484309342080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lazarus, R. S. (1991a). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarus, R. S. (1991b). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Lent, R. W. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychological adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 42–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., de Carrasquel, S. R., Munoz, C., Hernandez, M., Murakami, F., et al. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033003005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lord, R. G., & Kernan, M. C. (1987). Scripts as determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 12, 265–277.Google Scholar
  45. Mageau, G. A., Vallerand, R. J., Rousseau, F. L., Ratelle, C. F., & Provencher, P. J. (2005). Passion and gambling: Investigating the divergent affective and cognitive consequences of gambling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markus, H. (1997). Self-schema and processing information about self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in over generalizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011). Measuring lay concepts of well-being: The beliefs about well-being scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 267–287. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9194-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyer, J. D., Gagne, M., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2010). Toward an evidence-based model of engagement: What we can learn from motivation and commitment research. In S. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 62–73). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  50. Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1057–1087. doi: 10.1002/job.416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oliver, J. E., Jose, P. E., & Brough, P. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the work locus of control scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 835–851. doi: 10.1177/0013164405285544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Page, K. M., & Velle-Brodrick, D. Eight. (2009). The ‘What’, ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of employee well-being: A model. Social Indicators Research, 90, 441–458. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9270-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Lavigne, G. L. (2009). Passion does make a difference in people’s lives: A look at well-being in passionate and non-passionate individuals. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 3–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2008.01003.x.Google Scholar
  54. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Podsakoff, P. M., & Tudor, W. D. (1985). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and group processes and productivity. Journal of Management, 11, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roberts, T. P., & Zigarmi, D. (2014). The impact of dispositional cynicism on job-specific affect and work intentions. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 381–389. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rousseau, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Ratelle, C. F., Mageau, G. A., & Provencher, T. J. (2002). Passion and gambling: On the validation of the gambling passion scale (GPS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan, R. M., Chandler, C., Connell, J. K., & Deci, E. L. (1983, April). Internalization and motivation: Some preliminary research and theoretical speculations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Research in Child Development, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
  60. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. E. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation and education: The classroom milieu (pp. 13–51). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ryan, M. R., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of extrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryon, H. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2014). The role of locus of control in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 121–131. doi: 10.1177/0146167213507080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 173–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicator Research, 89, 41–60. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9230-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Séguin-Lévesque, C., Laliberté, M. L., Pelletier, L. G., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). Harmonious and obsessive passion for the Internet: Their associations with couples’ relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 197–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02079.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shaffer, J. A., & Postlethwaite, D. E. (2012). A matter of context: A meta-analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and non-contextualized personality measures. Personnel Psychology, 65, 245–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shuck, B., Ghosh, R., Zigarmi, D., & Nimon, K. (2013). The jingle jangle of employee engagement: Further exploration of the emerging construct and implications for workplace learning and performance. Human Resource Development Review, 12, 11–35. doi: 10.1177/1534484312463921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shuck, B., Zigarmi, D., & Owen, J. (2015). Psychological needs, engagement, and work intentions: A Bayesian multi-measurement mediation approach and implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(1), 2–21. doi: 10.1108/ETD-08-2014-0061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Operational Psychology, 61, 335–340.Google Scholar
  74. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  75. Tzeng, O. C. (1975). Differentiation of affective and denotative meaning systems and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 978–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory: A view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 312–318.Google Scholar
  77. Vallerand, R. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology, 49, 1–13. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The psychology of passion: A dualistic model. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599–620. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.ep9209210978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Leonard, M., et al. (2003). Les Passions de l’ame: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 756–767. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vallerand, R. J., Houlfort, N., & Forest, J. (2014). Passion for work: Determinants and outcomes. In M. Gagne (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 85–105). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 761–768. doi: 10.1037/a0017707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 477–514. doi: 10.1177/1094428110366036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wofford, J. C., & Goodwin, V. Al. (1990). Effects of feedback a cognitive processing and choice of decision style. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wofford, J. C., Goodwin, V. Al., & Whittington, J. Al. (1998). A field study of a cognitive approach to understanding transformational and transactional leadership (pp. 55–84). Nine: Leadership Quarterly.Google Scholar
  86. Zigarmi, D., & Nimon, K. (2011). A cognitive approach to work intention: The stuff that employee work passion is made of? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 447–461. doi: 10.1177/1523422311431152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., Houson, D., Witt, D., & Diehl, J. (2009). Beyond engagement: Toward a framework and operational definition of employee work passion. Human Resource Development Journal, 8, 300–326. doi: 10.1177/1534484309338171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., Houson, D., Witt, D., & Diehl, J. (2011). A preliminary field test of an employee work passion model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 195–221. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., Houson, D., Witt, D., & Diehl, J. (2012). The work intention inventory: Initial evidence of construct validity. Journal of Business Administration Research, 1, 24–42. doi: 10.5430/jbar.v1n1p24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Drea Zigarmi
    • 1
  • Fred J. Galloway
    • 2
  • Taylor Peyton Roberts
    • 3
  1. 1.The Ken Blanchard Companies and the University of San DiegoEscondidoUSA
  2. 2.University of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Valencore ConsultingSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations