Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 123–143 | Cite as

International Determinants of Subjective Well-Being: Living in a Subjectively Material World

Research Paper

Abstract

Researchers, policymakers, and the general public increasingly agree on the importance of subjective well-being as an indicator of individual and societal welfare. A vast literature has emerged over the last twenty years documenting the many variables that influence subjective well-being. The purpose of this study is to quantify the relative importance of these determinants in an attempt to synthesize the main strands in the literature and inform policy formulations. We use in our analysis three years’ worth of data from the Gallup World Poll, including 153 countries and ten geopolitical regions. We estimate the relative importance of four major domains of subjective well-being using a basic model with 25 independent variables, and a broader set of seven domains using an extended model with 60 independent variables. Our results show that material well-being is the main determinant of subjective well-being across all ten geopolitical regions. A particularly strong determinant of subjective well-being in our study is feelings about household income, whereas community functioning, governance and altruistic behaviors have a relatively low importance. Our results suggest that subjective material well-being and its objective determinants, including economic growth and income inequality, should remain at the center of the research and policy agenda. Further research is recommended to ascertain the relative importance of social, physical and purpose well-being.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Life evaluation Experienced well-being International differences World Poll 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Gallup for providing access to the Gallup World Poll data. We are particularly grateful to our Gallup colleagues that provided logistic support and feedback on this manuscript, including Julie Ray, Rajesh Srinivasan, Andrew Rzepa, Jon Clifton, Stafford Nichols and Jihad Fakhreddine.

Supplementary material

10902_2016_9812_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (98 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 97 kb)
10902_2016_9812_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (116 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 115 kb)
10902_2016_9812_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (57 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 57 kb)
10902_2016_9812_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (56 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 56 kb)

References

  1. Akay, A. & Martinsson, P. (2009). Sundays are blue: aren’t they? The day-of-the-week effect on subjective well-being and socio-economic status. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4563.Google Scholar
  2. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boarini, R. Comola, M., Smith, R., Manchin, R., & de Keulenaer, F. (2012). What makes for a better life? The determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countries—evidence from the Gallup World Poll. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2012/03, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 290–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canty, A., & Ripley, B. (2015). Bootstrap functions—Package ‘boot’. (Version 1.3–17) [Computer program].Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A., Etilé, F., Postel-Vinay, F., Senik, C., & Van der Straeten, K. (2005). Heterogeneity in reported well-being: evidence from twelve European countries. The Economic Journal, 115(502), C118–C132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A. E., Layard, R., & Senik, C. (2012). The causes of happiness and misery. UN World Happiness Report, 59–89.Google Scholar
  10. Deaton, A., & Tortora, R. (2015). People in Sub-Saharan Africa rate their health and health care among the lowest in the world. Health Affairs, 34(3), 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2010). Income’s association with judgments of life versus feelings. In Ed Diener, Daniel Kahneman, & John Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolan, P., & Kavetsos, G. (2016). Happy talk: Mode of administration effects on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(3), 1273–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleche, S., Smith, C., & Sorsa, P. (2011). Exploring determinants of subjective wellbeing in OECD countries: evidence from the world value survey. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 921, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujiwara, D., & Campbell, R. (2011). Valuation techniques for social cost-benefit analysis: Stated preference, revealed preference and subjective well-being approaches, a discussion of the current issues. United Kingdom: HM Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  21. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grömping, U. (2006). Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic Record, 80(s1), S24–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helliwell, J. F. (2008). Life satisfaction and the quality of development. NBER Working Papers 14507, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  25. Helliwell, J. F., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Harris, A.,& Huang, H. (2009). International evidence on the social context of well-being. NBER Working Papers 14720, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  26. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 19–20.Google Scholar
  28. Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (2000). The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 113–161). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kristoffersen, I. (2010). The metrics of subjective wellbeing: Cardinality, neutrality and additivity. Economic Record, 86(272), 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kroll, C. (2011). Different things make different people happy: Examining social capital and subjective well-being by gender and parental status. Social Indicators Research, 104(1), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kroll, C., & Delhey, J. (2013). A happy nation? Opportunities and challenges of using subjective indicators in policymaking. Social Indicators Research, 114(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8), 1833–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuroki, M. (2013). Crime victimization and subjective well-being: evidence from happiness data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  36. Linna, M. S., Kaprio, J., Raevuori, A., Sihvola, E., Keski-Rahkonen, A., & Rissanen, A. (2013). Body mass index and subjective well-being in young adults: a twin population study. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 717–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In O. P. John, R. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 795–814). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  39. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Manning, V., Gomez, B., Guo, S., Low, Y., Koh, P., & Wong, K. (2012). An exploration of quality of life and its predictors in patients with addictive disorders: Gambling, alcohol and drugs. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(4), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oguz, S., Merad, S., & Snape, D. (2013). Measuring national well-being—What matters most to personal well-being?. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  42. Oishi, S. (2010). Culture and well-being: Conceptual and methodological issues. In Ed Diener, Daniel Kahneman, & John Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. Science, 327(5965), 576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piliavin, J. A., & Siegel, E. (2007). Health benefits of volunteering in the Wisconsin longitudinal study. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48(4), 450–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Senik, C. (2011). The French unhappiness puzzle: The cultural dimension of happiness. Paris School of Economics Working Paper, No. 2011–34, Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques.Google Scholar
  47. Tov, W., & Au, E. W. M. (2013). Comparing well-being across nations: Conceptual and empirical issues. In I. Boniwell & S. David (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 448–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2013). Subjective well-being. In K. D. Keith (Ed.),  Encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Veenhoven, R. (2010). How universal is happiness? In Ed Diener, Daniel Kahneman, & John Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Way, B. M., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Is there a genetic contribution to cultural differences? Collectivism, individualism and genetic markers of social sensitivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2–3), 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winkelmann, R. (2005). Subjective well-being and the family: Results from an ordered probit model with multiple random effects. Empirical Economics, 30(3), 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Diego-Rosell
    • 1
  • Robert Tortora
    • 2
  • James Bird
    • 1
  1. 1.The Gallup OrganizationWashington DCUSA
  2. 2.ICFFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations