Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1557–1573 | Cite as

Beyond Income: The Importance for Life Satisfaction of Having Access to a Cash Margin

  • Martin Berlin
  • Niklas Kaunitz
Research Paper

Abstract

We study how life satisfaction among adult Swedes is influenced by having access to a cash margin, i.e. a moderate amount of money that could be acquired on short notice either through own savings, by loan from family or friends, or by other means. We find that cash margin is a strong and robust predictor of life satisfaction, also when controlling for individual fixed-effects and socio-economic conditions, including income. Since it shows not to matter whether cash margin comes from own savings or with help from family members, this measure captures something beyond wealth.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Income Cash margin Subjective well-being Living conditions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper has benefitted greatly from suggestions for improvements by Markus Jäntti and Anders Björklund. The authors also wish to express their gratitude towards Johan Egebark, Louise Johannesson, Maria Perrotta Berlin, and seminar participants at SOFI and at the Department of Economics at Stockholm University for valuable comments. Niklas Kaunitz gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation. Finally, the authors wish to thank an anonymous referee for drawing our attention to the suitable Dickens quote.

References

  1. Andersson, P. (2008). Happiness and health: Well-being among the self-employed. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353–372). New York : Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Baetschmann, G., Staub, K., & Winkelmann R. (2011). Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model. IZA discussion papers 5443, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel data. In Z. Griliches & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics (Vol. 2, Chap. 22, pp. 1247–1318). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  5. Christoph, B. (2010). The relation between life satisfaction and the material situation: A re-evaluation using alternative measures. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, A., Diener, Y., & Lucas, R. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), F222–F243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Ambrosio, C., Frick, J., & Jäntti, M. (2009). Satisfaction with life and economic well-being: Evidence from Germany. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 129(2), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das, M., & van Soest, A. (1999). A panel data model for subjective information on household income growth. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 40(4), 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2010). Income’s association with judgments of life versus feelings. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (Chap. 1, pp. 3–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank, R. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerdtham, U., & Johannesson, M. (2001). The relationship between happiness, health, and socio-economic factors: Results based on Swedish microdata. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(6), 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth income and consumption. Social Indicators Research, 87(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic Record, 80, S24–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonsson, J. O., & Mills, C. (2001). The Swedish level-of-living-surveys: A general overview and description of the event history data. In J. Jonsson & C. Mills (Eds.), Cradle to grave. Life-course change in modern Sweden (pp. 228–242). Durham: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jonsson, J. O., Mood, C., & Bihagen, E. (2010). Fattigdomens förändring, utbredning och dynamik. In Socialstyrelsen, Social rapport 2010 (Chap. 3, pp. 90–126). Västerås: Edita Västra Aros.Google Scholar
  23. Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2008). The marginal utility of income. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8–9), 1846–1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2008). Planning and financial literacy: How do women fare? American Economic Review, 98(2), 413–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Modigliani, F., & Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. In K. Kurihara (Ed.), Post-Keynesian economics (pp. 388–436). New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mullis, R. (1992). Measures of economic well-being as predictors of psychological well-being. Social Indicators Research, 26(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rudolf, R., & Kang, S.-J. (2011). Adaptation under Traditional Gender Roles: Testing the Baseline Hypothesis in South Korea. Discussion Paper No. 101, Courant Research Centre ‘Poverty, Equity and Growth’.Google Scholar
  30. Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. Working paper 16441, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations