Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1839–1856 | Cite as

Visualizing the Good Life: A Cross-Cultural Analysis

  • Gregory Bonn
  • Romin W. Tafarodi
Research Paper


How can we visualize similarity and difference across cultural conceptions of a good or worthy life? To examine the internal structure of such conceptions, we asked 584 university students from mainland China and Canada to indicate the relative importance of 30 elements or criteria commonly used in defining a good life. Statistical comparison and multidimensional scaling were used to reveal the form and extent of group commonalities and differences on the criteria and their meaning in relation to underlying dimensions of individual and cultural variation. The results suggested that South Asian Canadians were more oriented towards moral, spiritual, and beneficent concerns in envisioning a good life than were the mainland Chinese and Western European Canadians. The Chinese, for their part, tended to emphasize practical, prudential, and socially defined goods. This contrasted with the Western European Canadians, who showed more preference for personally defined, internal goods. East Asian Canadians fell between Chinese and Western European Canadians in overall orientation, reflecting their biculturality. All groups placed heavy emphasis on close and enduring relationships.


Good life Culture India China Multidimensional scaling Relationships 



This research was supported in part by a Standard Research Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410–2006–1127) to the second author. We thank Lindie Liang, Sara Houshmand, Tiffany Jenzer, and Parisa Ghanbari for their assistance with data collection and translation.


  1. Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57, 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzy, S., Collette, S., Ionta, S., Fornari, E., & Blanke, O. (2009). Subjective mental time line: The functional architecture of projecting the self to past and future. Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 2009–2017.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore, S. (2000). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling theory. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling theory and applications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. vol 3: Loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 21, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Busing, F. M. T. A., Groenen, P. J. F., & Heiser, W. J. (2005). Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation. Psychometrika, 70, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  11. Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert, D. (2007). Stumbling on happiness. London: Harpercollins.Google Scholar
  16. Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. (2002). Social connections in China: Institutions, culture and the changing nature of guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunde, R. (2002). Culture and customs of China. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  19. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R. (2006). Mapping global values. Comparative Sociology, 5, 115–136.Google Scholar
  22. Jahanbegloo, R. (2008). The spirit of India. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. (2003). The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 113–161). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, J. W., & Jones, P. S. (2002). Cultural differences in response to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework: solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Main, M. (1999). Epilogue: Attachment theory: Eighteen points with suggestions for future studies. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory: Research and clinical applications (pp. 845–857). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Culture, self, and the reality of the social. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 277–283.Google Scholar
  29. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, P. J., Fung, H., & Mintz, J. (1996). Self-construction through narrative practices: A Chinese and American comparison of early socialization. Ethos, 24, 237–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakamura, H. (1997). Ways of thinking of eastern peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan revised (ed). London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
  32. Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2002). Culture and cognition. In D. L. Medina (Ed.), Stevens handbook of experimental psychology. Wiley Online. doi:  10.1002/0471214426.
  33. Palkivala, N. (2002). We, the people. New Delhi: UBS Publishers and Distributors.Google Scholar
  34. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transcripts of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences, 362, 773–786.Google Scholar
  36. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1124, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stevens, J. P. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  41. Tafarodi, R. W., Bonn, G., Liang, H., Takai, J., Moriizumi, S., Belhekar, V., et al. (2012). What makes for a good life? A four-nation study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vyas, R. N. (1992). Nature of Indian culture. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Weber, M. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. P. Baehr & G. C. Wells, Trans. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1905).Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yeh, L. L., Kim, K. O., Chompreeda, P., Rimkeeree, H., Yau, N. J. N., & Lundahl, D. S. (1998). Comparison in use of the 9-point hedonic scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 416–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Monash University Sunway CampusJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences Jalan Lagoon SelatanPetaling JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations