A Population Study of Victimization, Relationships, and Well-Being in Middle Childhood
- 759 Downloads
The paper presents a population-based study on the association of victimization and peer and adult relationships with children’s life satisfaction, self-esteem, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The study extends previous research by examining 2-, 3-, and 4-way higher-order interaction effects (moderation hypotheses) of adults and peer relationships, victimization, and gender on positive and negative aspects of children’s well-being. The study draws from a representative population-level sample of 2,792 4th graders (M age = 9.70 years; 48.2 % girls). Data were obtained via student self-report survey on the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI). Given the nested data (children within classrooms), we employed multi-level regression analyses. Positive relationships with adults and peers were most strongly associated with life satisfaction and self-esteem, whereas victimization was most strongly associated with depressive symptoms and anxiety. No significant 2- or 3-way interactions were identified. The 4-way interaction of gender, adult connectedness, peer connectedness, and victimization was significant for three outcomes; that is, victimization was particularly strongly associated with low life satisfaction, low self-esteem, and high depressive symptoms for girls with low self-reports of peer and adult connectedness. The findings have implications for promoting children’s well-being in school and community contexts, corroborating interventions that foster relationship-building skills and simultaneously reduce victimization.
KeywordsChildren Life satisfaction Well-being Depressive symptoms Anxiety Social relationships with adults and peers Victimization Population-based study
Middle Years Development Instrument
The first and third author acknowledge funding from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, British Columbia, Canada. The research was supported by the Edith Lando Charitable Foundation, the SSHRC-funded Canadian Prevention Science Cluster, the United Way of the Lower Mainland, BC, Canada, and the Human Early Learning Partnership, UBC.
- Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Constantine, N. A., & Benard, B. (2001). California healthy kids survey resilience assessment model: Technical report. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.Google Scholar
- Dill, E. J., Vernberg, E. M., Fonagy, P., Twemlow, S. W., & Gamm, B. K. (2004). Negative affect in victimized children: the role of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and attitudes toward bullying. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 159–173. doi: 10.1023/B:JACP.0000019768.31348.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of Children, 9, 30–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602703.
- Hayden-Thomson, L. K. (1989). Children’s loneliness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Holder, M. D. (2012). Why study children’s and adult’s well-being, including their happiness? In Happiness in children: Measurement, correlates, and enhancement of positive subjective well-being. Springer Briefs in Well-being and Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4414-1_2.
- Kusche, C. A., Greenberg, M. T., & Beilke, R. (1988). Seattle Personality Questionnaire for young school-aged children. Unpublished manuscript. University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Seattle.Google Scholar
- Luthar, S. S. (2005). Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 740–795). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self-Description Questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M., & Crick, N. (2007). A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: Associations with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalizing problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 187–203. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407070101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Witkow, M. R. (2005). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: The psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 37–48. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rains, C. (2003). Seattle Personality Questionnaire—original (Fast Track Project Technical Report). Retrieved sanford.duke.edu/centers/child/fasttrack/techrept/s/spq/spq3tech.pdf.Google Scholar
- Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Guhn, M., Hymel, S., Hertzman, C., Sweiss, L., Gadermann, A. M., et al. (2010). Our children’s voices: The middle years development instrument. Measuring the developmental health and well-being of children in middle childhood. Vancouver, Canada: United Way. Retrieved from http://earlylearning.ubc.ca/media/uploads/publications/mdi_our_childrens_voices_report.pdf.
- Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747.Google Scholar
- WestEd. (2011). California healthy kids survey. Retrieved from http://chks.wested.org/administer/download.