The effect of housing and neighborhood satisfaction on perception of happiness in Bursa, Turkey

Abstract

This study aimed to correlate happiness with housing, housing area and neighborhood satisfaction based on the results of different studies that have shown that satisfaction with housing and the neighborhood affects residents’ perceptions of happiness. Unlike the related researches in the literature, this study controls for the negative consequences arising from financial concerns in its examination of the effect of housing, housing area and neighborhood satisfaction on happiness. The Balat neighborhood in Bursa, Turkey, which is popular with high-income residents, was selected for this study considering these issues. The participants were asked to indicate the importance they attribute to and their satisfaction levels with their housing estates, residences and neighborhood. Data were collected from 217 residents of 6 sites in the neighborhood who were selected using stratified sampling. Reliability analysis, frequency distributions, descriptive statistics and Chaid analysis were used to evaluate the data. The analysis found that the variable that most affected perceptions of happiness was housing estate satisfaction. According to the results obtained from the second stage of the analysis, satisfaction with the residence increased satisfaction with the housing estate, and therefore positively affected happiness. The third stage of the analysis indicated that the importance of the properties of the residential area on the housing site affected satisfaction with housing. This study discusses its results, the factors that determine housing and housing estate satisfaction and the relationship of the properties of the residential area with the happiness of residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Adams, R. E. (1992). Is happiness a home in the suburbs? The influence of urban versus suburban neighborhoods on psychological health. Journal of Community Psychology,20, 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey, T. C., & Snyder, C. (2010). Satisfaction with life and hope: A look at age and marital status. The Psychological Record,57(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blakely, E. J., & Synder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2003). Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study on the City of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning,65(1–2), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho, M., George, R. V., & Anthony, K. H. (1997). Residential satisfaction in condominios exclusivos (gate-guarded neighborhoods) in Brazil. Environment and Behavior,29(6), 734–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916597296002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapman, D. W., & Lombard, J. R. (2006). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction in fee-based gated and nongated communities. Urban Affairs Review,41(6), 769–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clapham, D., Foye, C., & Christian, J. (2018). The concept of subjective wellbeing in housing research. Housing Theory and Society,35(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1348391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2010). Does consumption buy happiness? Evidence from the United States. International Review of Economics,57(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist,55(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science,13, 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn, E. W., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Location, location, location: The misprediction of satisfaction in housing lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29(11), 1421–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. PNAS,100(19), 11176–11183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elsinga, M., & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,20, 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fallahi, B., & Mehrad, A. (2015). A review of housing and job satisfaction and its link to life happiness. The Online Journal of Counseling and Education,4(2), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feist, G. J., Bodner, T. E., Jacobs, J. F., Miles, M., & Tan, V. (1995). Integrating top-down and bottom-up structural models of subjective well-being: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68(1), 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foye, C. (2017). The relationship between size of living space and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,18(2), 427–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Foye, C., Clapham, D., & Gabrieli, T. (2018). Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data. Urban Studies.,55(6), 1290–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frijters, P., Johnston, D. W., & Shields, M. A. (2011). Life satisfaction dynamics with quarterly life event data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics,113(1), 190–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujiwara, D. (2013). The social impact of housing providers, HACT. Retrieved July 6, 2018 from https://www.hact.org.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/Archives/2013/02/The%20Social%20Impact%20of%20Housing%20FINALpdf.pdf.

  21. Galiani, S., Gertler, P.J., & Undurraga, R. (2015). The half-life of happiness: Hedonic adaptation in the subjective well-being of poor slum dwellers to a large improvement in. The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved June 29, 2018 from https://www.nber.org/papers/w21098.

  22. Gür, M., & Sezer, F. Ş. (2018). Popularity in house preference: A research on user satisfaction: Bursa Balat Sample. International Refereed Journal of Architecture and Design,14, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gurney, C. M. (1999). Pride and prejudice: Discourses of normalisation in public and private accounts of home ownership. Housing Studies,14(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being Longman Cheshire. Australia: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoare, R. (2004). Using CHAID for classification problems. Paper presented at New Zealand Statistical Association 2004 conference, Wellington

  26. Hu, F. (2013). Homeownership and subjective wellbeing in urban China: Does owning a house make you happier? Social Indicators Research,110(3), 951–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang, Z., Du, X., & Yu, X. (2015). Home ownership and residential satisfaction: Evidence from Hangzhou, China. Habitat International,49, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics,29(2), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., De Silva, V. G., Pina, S. A. M. G., Labaki, L. C., Ruschel, R. C., & Moreira, D. C. (2006). Quality of life and sustainability issues as seen by the population of low-income housing in the region of Campinas, Brazil. Habitat International,30, 1100–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Larsen, R., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research,17, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Larsen, R. J., & Eid, M. (2008). Ed Diener and the science of subjective well-being. In R. J. Larsen & M. Eid (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 1–13). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth and Change,30(2), 264–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lyubomirsky, S., Tkach, C., & Dimatteo, R. M. (2006). What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem? Social Indicators Research,78, 63–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning,65(1–2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00239-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin, F. (2012). Perceptions of links between quality of life areas: Implications for measurement and practice. Social Indicators Research,106(1), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Michalos, A. C. (1980). Satisfaction and happiness. Social Indicators Research,8(4), 385–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Michalos, A. C. (1983). Satisfaction and happiness in a rural northern resource community. Social Indicators Research,13, 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mutlu, E., & Varol, Ç. (2017). Sosyo-ekonomik farklılaşma ve mekânsal ayrışma: Bursa metropoliten alanı analizi. Megaron,12(1), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1996). The pursuit of happiness. Scientific American,274(5), 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology,3(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ratner, B. (2015). Market segmentation: defining target markets with CHAID. Dm Stat-1. Retrieved June 9, 2019 from http://www.dmstat1.com/res/MarketSegmentationWithCHAID.html.

  43. Ren, H., & Folmer, H. (2017). Determinants of residential satisfaction in urban China: A multi-group structural equation analysis. Urban Studies,54(6), 1407–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rohe, W. M., & Basolo, V. (1997). Long-term effects of homeownership on the self-perceptions and social interaction of low-income persons. Environment and Behavior,29(6), 793–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roitman, S. (2005). Who segregates whom? The analysis of a gated community in Mendoza, Argentina. Housing Studies,20(2), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rokach, L., & Maimon, O. (2015). Data mining with decision trees theory and applications (2nd ed.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rözer, J., Mollenhorst, G., & Poortman, A.-R. (2016). Family and friends: Which types of personal relationships go together in a network? Social Indicators Research,127, 809–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6), 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research,59(1), 79–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tran, T. Q., & Van Vu, H. (2018). A microeconometric analysis of housing and life satisfaction among the Vietnamese elderly. Quality & Quantity,52, 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & De Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning,65(1–2), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies,1, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vera-Toscano, E., & Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). The relevance of social interactions on housing satisfaction. Social Indicators Research,86, 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wolbring, T. (2017). Home sweet home! Does moving have (lasting) effects on housing satisfaction? Journal of Happiness Studies,18, 1359–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, F., Zhang, C., & Hudson, J. (2014). Housing conditions and life satisfaction in urban China. Cities,29(3), 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miray Gür.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 614 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gür, M., Murat, D. & Sezer, F.Ş. The effect of housing and neighborhood satisfaction on perception of happiness in Bursa, Turkey. J Hous and the Built Environ 35, 679–697 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09708-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Happiness
  • Residence satisfaction
  • Housing estate satisfaction
  • Property values
  • Chaid analysis