Critical factors affecting the implementation of sustainable housing in Australia

  • Jay Yang
  • Zhengyu Yang


Improved public awareness of the environment and available technologies will continue to highlight the importance of sustainable housing in the coming years. Despite this potential, the majority of new housing development is still “project homes” with few tangible sustainability measures. Different housing stakeholders tend to have different perceptions and priorities on sustainability. To promote the uptake of sustainable housing products, a study of the multi-dimensional issues affecting the implementation of sustainable housing is necessary. This research investigates multiple factors that influence key stakeholders’ decision-making toward sustainable housing adoption. Drawing insights from combined questionnaire and interview studies, 12 critical factors and their inter-relationships are identified based on professional views in the Australian housing industry. The mutual influences, or driving force and dependency, of these factors are further investigated via interpretive structural modeling to distinguish those requiring prominent and immediate attention. A hierarchical model is developed to help key stakeholders prioritize actions when implementing sustainable housing.


Sustainability Housing Framework Factors Mutual influence Australia 


  1. Adams, J., Khan, H. T. A., Raeside, R., & White, D. (2010). Research methods for graduate business and social science students. Writing, 14(3), 161–164.Google Scholar
  2. Adeyeye, K., Osmani, M., & Brown, C. (2007). Energy conservation and building design: The environmental legislation push and pull factors. Structural Survey, 25(5), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahuja, V., Yang, J., & Shankar, R. (2010). Benchmarking framework to measure extent of ICT adoption for building project management. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), 538–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akintoye, A. (2000). Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Construction Management and Economics, 18(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkeland, J. (2008). Positive development: From vicious circles to virtuous cycles through built environment design. Earthscan.Google Scholar
  6. Cetiner, I., & Ceylan, N. (2013). Environmental consequences of rehabilitation of residential buildings in Turkey: A case study of Istanbul. Building and Environment, 69, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiu, R. (2004). Socio-cultural sustainability of housing: A conceptual exploration. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(2), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, R. (2005). Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles. Building Research and Information, 33(5), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commonwealth of Australia. (2013). Australia green emission inventory system. Accessed 28 November 2013.
  10. Eshraghia, J., Narjabadifama, N., Mirkhania, N., Khosroshahia, S., & Ashjaeeb, M. (2014). A comprehensive feasibility study of applying solar energy to design a zero energy building for a typical home in Tehran. Energy and Buildings, 72, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Famuyibo, A., Duffya, A., & Strachan, P. (2013). Achieving a holistic view of the life cycle performance of existing dwellings. Building and Environment, 70, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green Builidng Council of Australia. (2011). Accessed 01 October 2011.
  13. Hayles, C., Dean, D., Lappin, S. A., & McCullough, J. E. (2013). Climate change adaptation: A decision support framework to encourage environmentally responsible behaviour. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(2), 192–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Innes, J. (2004). Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janes, F. (1988). Interpretive structural modelling: a methodology for structuring complex issues. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 10(3), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorenz, D. P., Truck, S., & Lutzkendorf, T. (2007). Exploring the relationship between the sustainability of construction and market value: Theoretical basics and initial empirical results from the residential property sector. Property Management, 25(2), 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Love, P. E. D., & Smith, J. (2003). Benchmarking, benchaction, and benchlearning: rework mitigation in projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lovell, H. (2004). Framing sustainable housing as a solution to climate change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 6(1), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowe, R., & Oreszczyn, T. (2008). Regulatory standards and barriers to improved performance for housing. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4475–4481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lutzkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. (2005). Sustainable property investment: Valuing sustainable buildings through property performance assessment. Building Research and Information, 33(3), 212–234.Google Scholar
  22. Lutzkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. (2007). Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation. Building Research and Information, 35(6), 644–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(6), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Margerum, R. D. (2008). A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management, 41(4), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGraw-Hill Construction, & US Green Building Councill. (2006). Green building smartmarket report.Google Scholar
  26. Melbourne Energy Institute. (2010). Zero Carbon Australia: Stationary energy plan. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, W., & Buys, L. (2012). Performance evaluation of eight contemporary passive solar homes in subtropical Australia. Building and Environment, 56, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, W., & Buys, L. (2013). Factors influencing sustainability outcomes of housing in subtropical Australia. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osmani, M., & O’Reilly, A. (2009). Feasibility of zero carbon homes in England by 2016: A house builder’s perspective. Building and Environment, 44(9), 1917–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panawek, K. (2007). Changing light green to deep green: mainstreaming green building in Hamilton County. Master Thesis, the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning, University of Cincinnati, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Pilkington, B., Roach, R., & Perkins, J. (2011). Relative benefits of technology and occupant behaviour in moving towards a more energy efficient, sustainable housing paradigm. Energy Policy, 39(9), 4962–4970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryghaug, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (2009). How energy efficiency fails in the building industry. Energy Policy, 37(3), 984–991.Google Scholar
  33. Santin, O. G. (2013). Occupant behaviour in energy efficient dwellings: evidence of a rebound effect. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. London: Financial Times.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, C. W. (2008). Bringing green homes within reach: Healthier housing for more people. Environmental Health Perspect, 116, A24–A31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin, D., Curtis, M., Huisingh, D., & Zwetsloot, G. I. (2008). Development of a sustainability policy model for promoting cleaner production: A knowledge integration approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1823–1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh, M., & Kant, R. (2008). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach. Proceedings of International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEE, Singapore, 2–4 December, pp. 2091–2095.Google Scholar
  38. Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: Frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development. Ecological Indicators, 2(3), 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sustainability Victoria. (2011). Business models for enabling sustainable precincts. Research report. Accessed 12 December 2010.
  40. Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., & Ries, R. (2009). Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turcotte, D. A. (2007). A framework for sustainable housing development in the United States. PhD Thesis, Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Urban Development Institute of Australia. (2011). Accessed 01 October 2011.
  43. Van Bueren, E. (2007). Establishing sustainability: Policy successes and failures. Building Research and Information, 35(5), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vandevyvere, H., & Neuckermans, H. (2006). From sustainable housing sciences to sustainable housing policies: Challenging the social responsibility of researchers and designers. In Proceedings of the world congress on housing transforming housing environments through design, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  45. Warnock, A. C. (2007). An overview of integrating instruments to achieve sustainable construction and buildings. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 18(4), 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wedding, G. (2008). Understanding sustainability in real estate: A focus on measuring and communicating success in green building. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Wilkinson, S. J., & Reed, R. G. (2007). The structural and behaviourial barriers to sustainable real estate development. In Proceedings of the American Real Estate Socienty (ARES) Conference. San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments. Sustainable Development, 15(3), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winston, N. (2010). Regeneration for sustainable communities? Barriers to implementing sustainable housing in urban areas. Sustainable Development, 18, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang, J. (2012). Editorial: Promoting integrated development for smart and sustainable built environment. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yates, A. (2001). Quantifying the business benefits of sustainable buildings. Centre for Sustainable Construction, BRE. Accessed 01 October 2011.
  52. Yau, Y. (2012). Eco-labels and willingess to pay: A Hong Kong study. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1(30), 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and Built EnvironmentQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations