Prevalence and Indicators of Household Smoking Bans Among American Indians
More than 58 million nonsmokers in the U.S. encounter secondhand smoke that leads to tobacco-related diseases and deaths every year, making voluntary household smoking bans an important public health goal. American Indians/Alaska Natives are rarely included in research related to household smoking bans. Further, most studies dichotomize household smoking bans into complete bans versus partial/no bans, rendering it impossible to determine if partial and no bans are associated with different or similar risk factors. Using the 2014 Cherokee Nation American Indian Adult Tobacco Survey, our study sought to identify prevalence of household smoking bans, their extent, and their correlates in an American Indian population. This cross-sectional analysis used multinomial logistic regression to determine correlates of complete, partial, and no household smoking bans. Results indicated that approximately 84% of Cherokee households have a complete ban. Younger age, female gender, higher education, higher household income, respondent’s nonsmoking status, good health, better awareness of harms related to secondhand smoke, visits with a healthcare provider within the past year, and children in the home were positively and significantly associated with complete household smoking bans. Additionally, there were notable differences between correlates related to partial bans and no bans. These results provide insight for the development of more appropriate interventions for American Indian households that do not have a complete household smoking ban.
KeywordsAmerican Indian Secondhand smoke exposure Household smoking ban
This study was supported by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20 MD006871). Additional support was provided by the Native Investigator Development program through funding from the National Institute on Aging (4P30AG015292-20). The fourth author wishes to acknowledge the partial funding provided by National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1 U54GM104938), an IDeA-CTR to the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.US Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 3.US Department of Health Human and Services. (2010). A report of the surgeon general: How tobacco smoke causes disease: What it means to you. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 9.Gonzales, M., Malcoe, L. H., Kegler, M. C., & Espinoza, J. (2006). Prevalence and predictors of home and automobile smoking bans and child environmental tobacco smoke exposure: A cross-sectional study of U.S.- and Mexico-born Hispanic women with young children. BMC Public Health, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-265.
- 11.Rohde, K., Boles, M., Bushore, C. J., Pizacani, B. A., Maher, J. E., & Peterson, E. (2013). Smoking-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among Alaska Native people: A population-based study. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72(1), 21141. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mowery, P. D., Dube, S. R., Thorne, S. L., Garrett, B. E., Homa, D. M., & Henderson, P. N. (2015). Disparities in smoking-related mortality among American Indians/Alaska Natives. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(5), 738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Redwood, D., Lanier, A. P., Renner, C., Smith, J., Tom-Orme, L., & Slattery, M. L. (2010). Differences in cigarette and smokeless tobacco use among American Indian and Alaska Native people living in Alaska and the Southwest United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(7), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board. (2016). NW tribal tobacco prevention guidebook. Retrieved May 1, 2016 from http://www.npaihb.org/images/resources_docs/Resource%20Guidebook.pdf.
- 18.University of Southern California. (2009). Culture and tobacco among American Indian adolescents: Final report November 2009. Retrieved May 1, 2016 from http://www.appealforcommunities.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/6633_AICultureTobaccoYouthFinalReport-1.pdf.
- 21.Daley, C. M., Faseru, B., Nazir, N., Solomon, C., Greiner, K. A., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Choi, W. S. (2011). Influence of traditional tobacco use on smoking cessation among American Indians. Addiction, 106(5), 1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03391.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics-applied (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 24.Kim, J. K., & Shao, J. (2013). Statistical methods for handling incomplete data. Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
- 25.Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH), Center for Health Statistics, Health Care Information, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014, on Oklahoma Statistics on Health Available for Everyone (OK2SHARE). Retrieved May 20, 2016 from http://www.health.state.ok.us/ok2share/.
- 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system; 2013 summary data quality report. Retrieved February 7, 2018 from https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2013/pdf/2013_dqr.pdf.