Journal of Community Health

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1187–1196 | Cite as

Delivery of Community-Based Care Through Inter-professional Teams in Brazil’s Unified Health System (UHS): Comparing Perceptions Across Community Health Agents (CHAs), Nurses and Physicians

  • Rahbel Rahman
  • Rogério Meireles Pinto
  • Margareth Santos Zanchetta
  • Melanie M. Wall
Original Paper
  • 122 Downloads

Abstract

Given the shortage of medical providers and the need for medical decisions to be responsive to community needs, including lay health providers in health teams has been recommended as essential for the successful management of global health care systems. Brazil’s Unified Health System (UHS) is a model for delivering community-based care through Family Health Strategy (FHS) interdisciplinary teams comprised of medical and lay health providers—Community Health Agents (CHAs), nurses, and physicians. This study aims to understand how medical and lay health providers’ perceptions and attitudes could impact the delivery of community-based care. The study compares perceptions and attitudes of 168 CHAs, 62 nurses, and 32 physicians across their job context, professional capacities, professional skills, and work environment. Descriptive and bivariate analysis were performed. CHAs reported being the most efficacious amongst the providers. Physicians reported incorporating consumer-input to a lesser degree than nurses and CHAs. CHAs reported using a lesser variety of skills than physicians. A significant proportion of physicians compared to CHAs and nurses reported that they had decision-making autonomy. Providers did not report differences that lack of resources and poor work conditions interfered with their ability to meet consumer needs. This study offers technocratic perspectives of medical and lay health providers who as an inter-professional team provide community-based primary health care. Implications of the study include proposing training priorities and identifying strategies to integrate lay health providers into medical teams for Brazil’s Unified Health System and other health systems that aim to deliver community-based care through inter-professional health teams.

Keywords

Community-based primary care Inter-professional health teams Lay health providers Community health workers Global health systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Columbia University School of Social Work and the Institute for Latin American Studies at Columbia University for supporting this research with pilot and dissemination funding, respectively. We thank research participants who provided the data for this research. We also thank the following: Estratégia Saúde da Família providers and administrators critical to the execution of this research Ivanete Hindriches da S. Torres, Roselí Monteiro Silva, Gilberto da Silva Dorneles, Paulo de Tarso Machado Assis, Maria do Carmo de Castro Tófani, and Nádia Cristina Dias Duarte; our partners at Universidade Católica Rio de Janeiro Sueli Bulhões da Silva, and Luíza Helena Nunes Ermel; and individuals who provided overall support—Susan Witte, Barbara L. Simon, Myra Sabir, and Anya Y. Spector.

Funding

This study was funded by Columbia University School of Social Work and the Institute for Latin American Studies at Columbia University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez, K., Wang, Y., Alegria, M., Ault-Brutus, A., Ramanayake, N., Yeh, Y.-H., … Shrout, P. E. (2016). Psychometrics of shared decision making and communication as patient centered measures for two language groups. Psychological Assessment, 28(9), 1074–1086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ammentorp, J., Sabroe, S., Kofoed, P.-E., & Mainz, J. (2007). The effect of training in communication skills on medical doctors’ and nurses’ self-efficacy: A randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(3), 270–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aquino, R., de Oliveira, N. F., & Barreto, M. L. (2009). Impact of the family health program on infant mortality in Brazilian municipalities. American Journal of Public Health, 99(1), 87–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baban, A., & Craciun, C. (2007). Changing health-risk behaviors: A review of theory and evidence-based interventions in health psychology. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 7(1), 45–67.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4). NewYork: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baptistini, R. A., & Figueiredo, T. A. M. (2014). Community Health Agents: The challenges of working in the rural area. Ambiente & Sociedade, 17(2), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhutta, Z. A., Lassi, Z. S., Pariyo, G., & Huicho, L. (2010). Global experience of Community Health workers for delivery of health related millennium development goals: A systematic review, country case studies, and recommendations for integration into national health systems. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brazil Ministry of Health. (2010). Standards, accreditation and implantation of Community Health Agents, Family Health and Oral Health. Retrieved from http://dab.saude.gov.br/portaldab/historico_cobertura_sf.php.
  9. 9.
    Brazil Ministry of Health. (2015). History of Family Health Program. Retrieved from http://dab.saude.gov.br/.
  10. 10.
    Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown, L. D., & Covey, J. G. (1987). Development organizations and organization development: Towards an expanded paradigm for organization development. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chou, L.-P., Li, C.-Y., & Hu, S. C. (2014). Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: Comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan. BMJ Open. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004185.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooke, M. (2016). TeamSTEPPS for health care risk managers: Improving teamwork and communication. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 36(1), 35–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper, L. A., Roter, D. L., Carson, K. A., Beach, M. C., Sabin, J. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Inui, T. S. (2012). The associations of clinicians’ implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 979–987.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crisp, N., & Chen, L. (2014). Global supply of health professionals. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(10), 950–957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cunha, A. B. O., & Vieira-da-Silva, L. M. (2010). Health services accessibility in a city of Northeast Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(4), 725–737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    da Silva, T. D. A., Beserra, H. J. M. D., de Souza, M. C., dos Santos, S. R., Holmes, E. S., Alves, R. S., … da Fonseca, L. D. C. T. (2016). burnout syndrome in Community Health Agents: An integrative review. International Archives of Medicine. doi: 10.3823/2222.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    DATSTAT Illume (1997). DATSTAT (data management software). Seattle, WA: DATSTAT Illume.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Oliveira Moura, A. I., Carvalho, J. K. V., de Almeida, M. M., Lages, M. D. A. R., & Fontenele, R. H. S. (2014). Participation in the health education in the Family Health Strategy. Revista Interdisciplinar, 6(4), 132–141.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Donelan, K., DesRoches, C. M., Dittus, R. S., & Buerhaus, P. (2013). Perspectives of physicians and nurse practitioners on primary care practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(20), 1898–1906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    dos Santos, E. R., Huang, H., Menezes, P. R., & Scazufca, M. (2016). Prevalence of depression and depression care for populations registered in primary care in two remote cities in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150046.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    dos Santos Pedrosa, J. I., & Teles, J. B. M. (2001). Agreements and disagreements in the Family Health Care Program team. Revista de Saúde Pública, 35(3), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Falavigna, A., Canabarro, C. T., & Medeiros, G. S. (2013). Health system and medical education in Brazil: History, principles, and organization. World Neurosurgery, 80(6), 723–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fillenbaum, G. G., Blay, S. L., Pieper, C. F., King, K. E., Andreoli, S. B., & Gastal, F. L. (2013). The association of health and income in the elderly: Experience from a southern state of Brazil. PLOS ONE, 8(9), 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., … Kelley, P (2010). Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet, 376(9756), 1923–1958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frigo, J., Costa, E. R., Kolhs, M., & Busnello, G. (2013). Tasks performed by professional nurses in family health strategy. Journal of Nursing UFPE On Line, 7(9), 5421–5426.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    George, A. (2008). Nurses, community health workers, and home carers: Gendered human resources compensating for skewed health systems. Global Public Health, 3(S1), 75–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gopalan, S. S., Mohanty, S., & Das, A. (2012). Assessing community health workers’ performance motivation: A mixed-methods approach on India’s Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) programme. BMJ Open, 2(5), e001557.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hansson, A., Arvemo, T., Marklund, B., Gedda, B., & Mattsson, B. (2010). Working together—Primary care doctors’ and nurses’ attitudes to collaboration. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(1), 78–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hollingshead, N. A., Matthias, M. S., Bair, M., & Hirsh, A. T. (2016). Healthcare providers’ perceptions of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with chronic pain: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 9(3), 35–44.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson, C. D., Noyes, J., Haines, A., Thomas, K., Stockport, C., Ribas, A. N., & Harris, M. (2013). Learning from the Brazilian community health worker model in North Wales. Globalization and Health. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-25.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liaw, S. Y., Zhou, W. T., Lau, T. C., Siau, C., & Chan, S. W. (2014). An interprofessional communication training using simulation to enhance safe care for a deteriorating patient. Nurse Education Today, 34, 259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lim, J., Bogossian, F., & Ahern, K. (2010). Stress and coping in Singaporean nurses: A literature review. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(2), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Loveman, M., Muniz, J. O., & Bailey, S. R. (2012). Brazil in black and white? Race categories, the census, and the study of inequality. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(8), 1466–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Macinko, J., & Harris, M. J. (2015). Brazil’s family health strategy—Delivering community-based primary care in a universal health system. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(23), 2177–2181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Malta, D. C., Duarte, E. C., Escalante, J. J. C., Almeida, M. F., Sardinha, L. M. V., Macário, E. M., … Morais Neto, & O, L. (2010). Avoidable causes of infant mortality in Brazil, 1997–2006: Contributions to performance evaluation of the Unified National Health System. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(3), 481–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Medeiros, C. R. G., Junqueira, A. G. W., Schwingel, G., Carreno, I., Jungles, L. A. P., & Saldanha, O. M. F. L. (2010). Nurses and doctors turnover: An impasse in the implementation of the Family Health Strategy. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva, 15(S1), 1521–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nurius, P. S., & Macy, R. J. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral theory. In M. K. Sowers & C. N. Dulmus (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare (Vol. 3). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paim, J., Travassos, C., Almeida, C., Bahia, L., & Macinko, J. (2011). The Brazilian health system: History, advances, and challenges. Lancet, 377(9779), 1778–1797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Paradies, Y., Truong, M., & Priest, N. (2014). A systematic review of the extent and measurement of healthcare provider racism. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(2), 364–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Perry, H. B., Zulliger, R., & Rogers, M. M. (2014). Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: An overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annual review of public health, 35, 399–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pinto, R. M., Da Silva, S. B., Penido, C., & Spector, A. Y. (2012). International participatory research framework: Triangulating procedures to build health research capacity in Brazil. Health Promotion International, 27(4), 435–444. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar090.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pinto, R. M., Wall, M., Yu, G., Penido, C., & Schmidt, C. (2012). Primary care and public health services integration in Brazil’s Unified Health System. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rissardo, L. K., & Carreira, L. (2014). Organization of healthcare and assistance to the elderly indigenous population: Synergies and particularities of the professional context. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(1), 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Robert, G., Waite, R., Cornwell, J., Morrow, E., & Maben, J. (2014). Understanding and improving patient experience: A national survey of training courses provided by higher education providers and healthcare organizations in England. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 112–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rocha, N. H. N., Barletto, M., & Bevilacqua, P. D. (2013). Identity of Community Health Agents: Composing emerging rationalities. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 17(47), 847–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sakata, K. N., & Mishima, S. M. (2012). Cooperative interventions and the interaction of Community Health Agents within the family health team. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 46(3), 665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Santos, K. T., Saliba, N. A., Moimaz, S. A. S., Arcieri, R. M., & Carvalho, M. L. (2011). Community Health agent: Status adapted with family health program reality? Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(S1), 1023–1028. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232011000700035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Silveira, D. S., Facchini, L. A., Siqueira, F. V., Piccini, R. X., Tomasi, E., Thumé, E., … Maia, & M, F. S. (2010). Management of work, education, information, and communication in primary healthcare in cities in Southern and Northeastern Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(9), 1714–1726.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Simons-Morton, B., McLeroy, K. R., & Wendel, M. (2012). Behavior theory in health promotion practice and research. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    SPSS Inc. (Version 22). Chicago, IL, USA: IBM.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Steckler, A., Goodman, R. M., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Theories of organizational change. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3 edn.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Teles, M. A., Barbosa, M. R., Vargas, A. M., Gomes, V. E., e Ferreira, E. F., Martins, A. M., & Ferreira, R. C. (2014). Psychosocial work conditions and quality of life among primary health care employees: A cross sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 72. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Telles, E. E. (2004). Race in another America: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Woltz, S., Krijnen, P., Meylaerts, S. A., Pieterse, A. H., & Schipper, I. B. (2017). Shared decision making in the management of midshaft clavicular fractures: Nonoperative treatment or plate fixation. International Journal of the Care of the Injured. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    World Health Organization (2007). Task shifting: Rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: Global recommendations and guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    World Health Organization (2014). WHO global health workforce statistics. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/hwfstats/en/.
  61. 61.
    Zanchetta, M. S., Pinto, R. M., Galhego-Garcia, W., da Cunha, Z., Cordeiro, H. A., Fagundes-Filho, F. E., … Caldas, R. S. (2014). Brazilian Community Health Agents and qualitative primary healthcare information. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 16, 235–245. doi: 10.1017/S146342361400019X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zanchetta, M. S., Salami, B. K., Perreault, M., & Leite, L. (2012). Scientific and popular health knowledge in the education work of Community Health Agents in Rio de Janeiro shantytowns. Health Education Research, 27(4), 608–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Daphne Cockwell School of NursingRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of BiostatisticsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations