Journal of Community Health

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1156–1162 | Cite as

Race is a Strong Predictor of Receipt of a Written Survivorship Care Plan: Results from the National Health Interview Survey

Original Paper
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of receipt of written documentation of follow up care and of cancer treatments and to examine the predictors of receipt of such written documentation. Data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey was used to identify individuals 18 years or older with a history of cancer. Binary and multinomial logistic regression were used to investigate patient-level variables associated with receipt of written documentation of cancer treatment, written advice about follow-up care, or both written documents. Patient-level variables included in the analysis were age, gender, region of residence, race/ethnicity, marital status, education level, insurance coverage, cancer type, employment status, and psychosocial support. Of the 1185 responses to the questions used to access receipt of a SCP, the prevalence of any receipt of a written documentation was 68%, where 30% obtained written advice only and 8% were provided a written treatment summary only; only 31% received both. Non-white race, cancer type, and psychosocial services were associated with increased odds of receiving written documentation. Patient-level characteristics are associated with receipt of care plan documentation. Further work needs to investigate the interaction of provider and patient-level characteristics. Understanding patient-level characteristics associated with receipt of written documentation may help uncover strategies for improved survivorship care plan implementation.

Keywords

National Health Interview Survey Cancer Survivorship Disparities 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control. (2004). A national action plan for cancer survivorship: Advancing public health strategies. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Basic information about cancer survivorship. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Denlinger, C. S., Carlson, R. W., Are, M., et al. (2014). Survivorship: Introduction and definition. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 12(1), 34–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hewitt, M., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E. (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia, S. F., Kircher, S. M., Oden, M., et al. (2016). Survivorship care planning in a comprehensive cancer center using an implementation framework. The Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology, 14(5), 192–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salz, T., Oeffinger, K. C., McCabe, M. S., Layne, T. M., & Bach, P. B. (2012). Survivorship care plans in research and practice. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62(2), 101–117.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCabe, M. S., Bhatia, S., Oeffinger, K. C., et al. (2013). American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: Achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 31(5), 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jabson, J. M., & Bowen, D. J. (2013). Cancer treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions: which cancer survivors receive them? Cancer Causes and Control: CCC, 24(5), 861–871.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jabson, J. M. (2015). Treatment summaries, follow-up care instructions, and patient navigation: could they be combined to improve cancer survivor’s receipt of follow-up care? Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 9, 692–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chubak, J., Aiello Bowles, E. J., Tuzzio, L., et al. (2014). Perspectives of cancer survivors on the role of different healthcare providers in an integrated delivery system. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 8(2), 229–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Advani, P. S., Ying, J., Theriault, R., et al. (2014). Ethnic disparities in adherence to breast cancer survivorship surveillance care. Cancer, 120(6), 894–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keating, N. L., Landrum, M. B., Guadagnoli, E., Winer, E. P., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2006). Factors related to underuse of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 24(1), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashing, K., Rosales, M., Lai, L., & Hurria, A. (2014). Occurrence of comorbidities among African-American and Latina breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 8(2), 312–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tammemagi, C. M., Nerenz, D., Neslund-Dudas, C., Feldkamp, C., & Nathanson, D. (2005). Comorbidity and survival disparities among Black and White patients with breast cancer. JAMA, 294(14), 1765–1772.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Du, X. L., Fang, S., & Meyer, T. E. (2008). Impact of treatment and socioeconomic status on racial disparities in survival among older women with breast cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 125–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tompkins Stricker, C., Jacobs, L. A., Risendal, B., et al. (2011). Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: How are we faring? Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 5, 358–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobs, L. A., & Shulman, L. N. (2017). Follow-up care of cancer survivors: Challenges and solutions. The Lancet Oncology, 18, e19–e29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Louis University Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University Center for Interprofessional Education and ResearchSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Saint Louis University Center for Health Outcomes ResearchSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations