Journal of Community Health

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1090–1095 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Drug Camps in Treatment of Substance Abuse in Thailand

Original Paper
  • 257 Downloads

Abstract

Various drug camps have been introduced in Thailand since the 2000s. This study explored the effects of drug camps in Thailand. Four provinces were selected to represent different region throughout Thailand. Assessments of 2679 drug users were carried out longitudinally, age ranging from 11 to 67 years old; assessments occurred before camp, after camps, and after a 1 year follow-up. Two hundred twenty-six camps organizers, community leaders, and lay people were selected as key informants. Twenty communities were observed prospectively and 400 lay people were studied. Self-administered questionnaires were utilized as well as interview guidelines and documents. It emerged that the effectiveness of drug camp was 51.3% (intention-to-treat), whilst poly drug use increased significantly from before camp and 3 months after camp (repeated ANOVA p < 0.001) particularly among users aged 15 years old and over. Drug camps could be considered as an alternative measure for drug users; however, negative impacts should be considered.

Keywords

Substance abuse treatment Drug camp Effectiveness Thailand 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Grateful acknowledgement is made to the ISAN Academic Network, Khon Kaen University, for generous support for facilities. We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.com) for English language editing and Publication Support.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB88/2556) for funding support of this research project.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

This research project was approved by the Human Research Ethical Committee Khon Kaen University (approval number HE571147) based on the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and ICH GCP standards.

Informed Consent

Written consent was acquired from the participants and from the parents/guardians of minors.

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2016). World Drug Report 2016. United Nations publication, Sales No. E.16.XI.7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fine Art Department (1978). The Sam Duang Act. Bangkok: Veteran Organisation Publishing (in Thai).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poshyachinda, V. (1980). Heroin in Thailand. In The 4th Anniversary of the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (pp. 56–87). Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister (in Thai).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poshyachinda, V., Phittayanon, P., Simasatitkul, V., & Perngparn, U. (1998). Stimulant use, abuse and dependence in Thailand. In A. Eriksen, D. Abeysekara & M. S. Boralessa (Eds.), Alcohol and drugs perspectives, prevention and control—Asia Pacific region (pp. 77–106). Colombo: Alcohol and Drug Information Centre.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Narcotics Analysis and Technical Service Institute. (2004). Internal drug analysis record. Office of the Narcotics Control Board, Ministry of Justice, 2000–2004, unpublished statistics.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Administrative Committee on Substance Abuse Academic Network. National household survey on substance abuse 2011. (2012). Office of Narcotic Control Board (in Thai).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demand Reduction Division. (2012). Treatment statistics among drug users in Thailand. Prevention and Development Bureau, Office of Narcotic Control Board, unpublished statistics.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanato, M., Nunun, W., & Momen, K. (2010). Thailand drug policies. Khon Kaen: ISAN (in Thai).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poshyachinda, V., Phittayanon, P., Simasatitkul, V., & Perngparn, U. (2005). Stimulant use, abuse and dependence in Thailand. In A. Eriksen, D. Abeysekara, & M. S. Boralessa (Eds). Alcohol and drugs perspectives, prevention and control—Asia Pacific region. Drug and alcohol review, vol. 24,(pp. 461–466) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Department of Probation. (2002). Drug Users Rehabilitation Act. (in Thai).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Surveillance Division. (2015). Statistics among drug users in Thailand. Strategy Bureau, Office of Narcotic Control Board, unpublished statistics.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thai Government. (2014). Policy Declaration. Retrieved July 25, 2016, from http://www.opdc.go.th/Law/File_download/law 19957.pdf.
  13. 13.
    Kanato, M. (2002). Drug camps in Thailand: its effectiveness. Strategy Bureau, Office of Narcotic Control Board (in Thai).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Office of Narcotic Control Board. (2015). Drug camp manual. Available at http://buengkanphc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/คู่มือศูนย์ขวัญแผ่นดิน.pdf.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pushpanathan, S. (1999). Combating transnational crime in ASEAN. In 7th ACPF World Conference on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, pp. 23–26Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    WHO ASSIST Working Group (2000). The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 97(9), 1183–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Health Organization (1996). WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version. Program on Mental Health. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanato, M. & Leyatikul, P. (2014). Thai addiction stigma scale. Community Health Development Quarterly, 2(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hantson, J., Wang, P. P., Grizenko-Vida, M., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of a therapeutic summer camp for children with ADHD: Phase I clinical intervention trial. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(7), 610–617.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Institute on Drug Abuse, & United States of America. (1999). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide. Retrieved July 29, 2016, from https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih.../national-institute-drug-abuse-nida.
  22. 22.
    Hubbard, R. L., Craddock, S. G., & Anderson, J. (2003). Overview of 5-year follow up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome studies (DATOS). Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, 25, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kanato, M. (2008). Drug use and health among prison inmates. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 21(3), 252–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of MedicineKhon Kaen UniversityMuang Khon KaenThailand
  2. 2.Faculty of Public HealthVongchavalitkul UniversityMuang Nakhon RatchasimaThailand

Personalised recommendations