Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 838–846 | Cite as

Estimating the Impact of Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy: The San Bernardino County Experience

  • Michael Batech
  • Serena Tonstad
  • Jayakaran S. Job
  • Richard Chinnock
  • Bryan Oshiro
  • T. Allen Merritt
  • Gretchen Page
  • Pramil N. Singh
Original Paper

Abstract

We examined the relation between maternal smoking and adverse infant outcomes [low birth weight (LBW), and preterm birth (PTB)] during 2007–2008 in San Bernardino County, California—the largest county in the contiguous United States which has one of the highest rates of infant mortality in California. Using birth certificate data, we identified 1,430 mothers in 2007 and 1,355 in 2008 who smoked during pregnancy. We assessed the effect of never smoking and smoking cessation during pregnancy relative to smoking during pregnancy for the 1,843/1,798 LBW, and 3,480/3,238 PTB’s recorded for 2007/2008, respectively. To describe the effect of quitting smoking during pregnancy, we calculated the exposure impact number for smoking during pregnancy. Major findings are: (1) relative to smoking during pregnancy, significantly lower risk of LBW among never smoking mothers [OR, year: 0.56, 2007; 0.54, 2008] and for smoking cessation during pregnancy [0.57, 2007; 0.72, 2008]; (2) relative to smoking during pregnancy, significantly lower risk of PTB was found for never smoking mothers [0.68, 2007; 0.68, 2008] and for smoking cessation during pregnancy [0.69, 2007; 0.69, 2008]; (3) an exposure impact assessment indicating each LBW or PTB outcome in the county could have been prevented either by at least 35 mothers quitting smoking during pregnancy or by 25 mothers being never smokers during pre-pregnancy. Our findings identify an important burden of adverse infant outcomes due to maternal smoking in San Bernardino County that can be effectively decreased by maternal smoking cessation.

Keywords

San Bernardino County Maternal tobacco use Smoking cessation during pregnancy Exposure impact number 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grant HHSN267200700021C from NICHD/Department of Health and Human Services (National Children’s Study Award to University of California, Irvine, and sub-award to Loma Linda University and Cal State San Bernardino).

References

  1. 1.
    Culyer, A. J., & Newhouse, J. P. (2000). Handbook of health economics (1st ed.). Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cnattingius, S. (2004). The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(Suppl. 2), S125–S140. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001669187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    (2001) Women and smoking: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta (GA).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease, Control, and Prevention. (2008). Smoking prevalence among women of reproductive age—United States, 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(31), 849–852.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The 2004 United States surgeon general’s report: The health consequences of smoking. (2004). N S W Public Health Bull, 15(5–6):107.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Osterman, M. J., Martin, J. A., Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2011). Expanded data from the new birth certificate, 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports, 59(7), 1–28.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Mathews, T. J., & Osterman, M. J. (2010). Births: Final data for 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports, 59(1), 3–71.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Institute, University of Wisconsin Population Health. (2012). County health rankings 2012. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vital Statistics Query System. State of California, Department of Public Health, Birth and Death Records. (2010). http://www.apps.cdph.ca.gov/vsq/screen_idra.asp?cnty_cd=36&Year_Data=2009&Stats=4.
  10. 10.
    CDPH. (2009). Vital statistics query system. Retrieved 16 July 2012 from http://www.applications.dhs.ca.gov/vsq/default.asp.
  11. 11.
    Knox, N. (2008). Foreclosures plague san bernardino county, calif., USA TODAY. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/closetohome/2008-01-28-san-bernardino_N.htm.
  12. 12.
    Willon, P. (2012, July 25, 2012). Bankrupt san bernardino must cut spending by a third, Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-san-bernardino-cuts-20120726,0,397850.story.
  13. 13.
    Shimura, T. (2012). County unemployment rate increases despite job growth, High Desert Daily Press. Retrieved from http://www.vvdailypress.com/news/jobs-35672-rate-added.html.
  14. 14.
    Alexander, G. R., Himes, J. H., Kaufman, R. B., Mor, J., & Kogan, M. (1996). A united states national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87(2), 163–168. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cook, R. J., & Sackett, D. L. (1995). The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. British Medical Journal, 310(6977), 452–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bender, R., Kuss, O., Hildebrandt, M., & Gehrmann, U. (2007). Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 26(30), 5586–5595. doi: 10.1002/sim.3061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heller, R. F., Dobson, A. J., Attia, J., & Page, J. (2002). Impact numbers: measures of risk factor impact on the whole population from case-control and cohort studies. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 56(8), 606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marks, J. S., Koplan, J. P., Hogue, C. J., & Dalmat, M. E. (1990). A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation for pregnant women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 6(5), 282–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Catlin, A. (2006). Extremely long hospitalizations of newborns in the United States: data, descriptions, dilemmas. Journal of Perinatol, 26(12), 742–748. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swamy, G. K., Ostbye, T., & Skjaerven, R. (2008). Association of preterm birth with long-term survival, reproduction, and next-generation preterm birth. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(12), 1429–1436. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.12.1429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Drotar, D., et al. (2005). Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(3), 318–325. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.3.318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dietz, P. M., Homa, D., England, L. J., et al. (2011). Estimates of nondisclosure of cigarette smoking among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(3), 355–359. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Batech
    • 1
    • 7
  • Serena Tonstad
    • 2
  • Jayakaran S. Job
    • 3
  • Richard Chinnock
    • 4
  • Bryan Oshiro
    • 5
  • T. Allen Merritt
    • 6
  • Gretchen Page
    • 8
  • Pramil N. Singh
    • 1
    • 7
  1. 1.Loma Linda University School of Public HealthLoma LindaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Promotion and EducationLoma Linda University School of Public HealthLoma LindaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Global HealthLoma Linda University School of Public HealthLoma LindaUSA
  4. 4.Department of PediatricsLoma Linda University Medical CenterLoma LindaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsLoma Linda University Medical CenterLoma LindaUSA
  6. 6.Department of PediatricsLoma Linda University School of MedicineLoma LindaUSA
  7. 7.Loma Linda University Center for Health ResearchLoma LindaUSA
  8. 8.Southern Inland Counties Regional Perinatal ProgramLoma Linda University Medical CenterLoma LindaUSA

Personalised recommendations