Associations Between Perceptions and Involvement in Neighborhood Violence and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Among Urban, African American Men
Violence disproportionately affects African American men and their communities. Research is needed to inform programming efforts to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in violence exposure, involvement, and victimization. The current study examined involvement in and perceptions of neighborhood violence and relation to perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV) among a sample of urban, African American men. Participants of this cross-sectional study were sexually active African American men (n = 703) between the ages of 18 and 65 years, recruited from urban community health centers. Age-adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess associations between neighborhood violence variables and perpetration of IPV. In age-adjusted logistic regression models, involvement with street violence in the previous 6 months (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.0; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.9–4.6), ever being involved with gangs (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.3–3.2), and perceptions/beliefs that violence occurs in one’s neighborhood (ORs = 2.0–3.1) were found to be significantly associated with IPV perpetration. Findings demonstrate that involvement in neighborhood violence as well as perceptions/beliefs that violence occurs in one’s neighborhood are associated with increased likelihood of IPV perpetration among urban, African American men. While socioeconomics and substance use contribute to high rates of these forms of violence, the relation between these forms of violence and perpetration of IPV was significant beyond the influences of these factors. Findings suggest that future violence prevention and treatment efforts will be most successful by addressing multiple forms of violence.
KeywordsDomestic violence Intimate partner violence Neighborhood violence
This Project funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Grant # CCU123364). We would like to acknowledge CDC Project Officers Stephen Flores and Lisa Fitzpatrick as well as Dr. Barbara Gottlieb and Dr. Beth Molnar from Harvard School of Public Health, for their support and guidance on this project as well as the following organizations and agencies for housing and consulting on our study: Multicultural AIDS Coalition and Boston Public Health Commission, Whittier Street Health Center, DOTWELL: Codman Square and Dorchester House Community Health Services, Boston Medical Center’s Urgent Care Clinic. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- 2.Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, D.C: US Department of Justice. NCJ 181867.Google Scholar
- 4.Centers for Disease Control. (2001). Surveillance for homicide by intimate partners—United States 1981–1998. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Review, 50(SS03), 1–16.Google Scholar
- 5.Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Homicide trends in the US intimate homicide, June 2006. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/intimates.htm. Accessed April 22, 2007.
- 6.Rennison, C., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Bureau of justice statistics special report. Washington, D.C: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. May, NCJ178247.Google Scholar
- 7.Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Patterns of victimization and offending vary by age, gender, and racial group. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/ageracesex.htm. Accessed April 22, 2007.
- 15.Silverman, J. G., Decker, M. R., Reed, E., Rothman, E. F., Hathaway, J. E., Raj, A., et al. (2006). Social norms and beliefs regarding sexual risk and pregnancy involvement among adolescent males treated for dating violence perpetration. Journal of Urban Health, 83(4), 723–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Boston Public Health Commission. Health of Boston. (2005). http://www.bphc.org/reports/pdfs/report_205.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2006.
- 25.Kurth, A. E., Martin, D. P., Golden, M. R., Weiss, N. S., Heagerty, P. J., Spielberg, F., et al. (2004). A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 31(12), 719–726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Straus, M. A. (2005). Bibliography and tabular summary of publications on the revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2 and CTSPC). Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
- 31.Fagan, J., Stewart, D. K., & Hansen, K. V. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In D. Finkelhor, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 49–67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 34.Farrington, D. P. (1994). Childhood, adolescent, and adult features of violent males. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 215–240). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- 35.Hotaling, G. T., Straus, M. A., & Lincoln, A. J. (1989). Intrafamily violence, and crime and violence outside the family. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence (pp. 315–375). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 39.Renzetti, C. M., & Maier, S. L. (2002). Private crime in public housing: Violent victimization, fear of crime and social isolation among women public housing residents. Women’s Health and Urban Life, 1, 46–65.Google Scholar
- 41.Pearlmann, D., Zierler, S., Gjelsvik, A., & Verhoek-Oftedahl, W. (2003). Neighborhood environment, racial position, and risk of police-reported domestic violence: A contextual analysis. Public Health Reports, 118(1), 44–58.Google Scholar
- 45.Makkai, T. (2002). Illicit drugs and crime. In A. Graycar & P. Grabosky (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of Australian criminology (pp. 110–125). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 46.Spooner, C., Hall, W., & Lynskey, M. (2001). The structural determinants of youth drug use. Research paper number 2. Canberra: Australian National Council on Drugs.Google Scholar
- 47.Xiaoming, L., Stanton, B., & Feigelman, S. (1999). Exposure to drug trafficking among urban low-income African American children and adolescents. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 153, 161–168.Google Scholar
- 51.DeKeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., Alvi, S., & Tomaszewski, E. A. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy and women’s victimization in public housing: An exploratory study. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 499–516.Google Scholar
- 53.Jordan, L. M. (2006). Domestic violence in the African American community: The role of the Black Church. http://www.hds.harvard.edu/cswr/research/RHHI/healing_reports/05.Jordan.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2006.
- 56.Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Violent men and violent contexts. In R. E. Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 141–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 58.El-Bassel, N., Fontdevila, J., Gilbert, L., Voisin, D., Richman, B. L., & Pitchell, P. (2001). HIV risks of men in methadone maintenance programs who abuse their intimate partners: A forgotten issue. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 29–43.Google Scholar