Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cancer Outcomes Research in a Rural Area: A Multi-Institution Partnership Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whereas, most cancer research data come from high-profile academic centers, little is known about the outcomes of cancer care in rural communities. We summarize the experience of building a multi-institution partnership to develop a cancer outcomes research infrastructure in Southwest Georgia (SWGA), a primarily rural 33-county area with over 700,000 residents. The partnership includes eight institutions: the Emory University in Atlanta, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Georgia Comprehensive Center Registry (the Registry), the Southwest Georgia Cancer Coalition (the Coalition), and the four community cancer centers located within the SWGA region. The practical application of the partnership model, its organizational structure, and lessons learned are presented using two specific examples: a study evaluating treatment decisions and quality of life among prostate cancer patients, and a study of treatment discontinuation among prostate, breast, lung, and colorectal cancer patients. Our partnership model allowed us to (1) use the Coalition as a link between Atlanta-based researchers and local community; (2) collaborate with the area cancer centers on day-to-day study activities; (3) involve the Registry personnel and resources to identify eligible cancer cases and to perform data collection; and (4) raise community awareness and sense of study ownership through media announcements organized by the Coalition. All of the above activities were performed in consultation with the funding institution (CDC) and its project directors who oversee several other studies addressing similar research questions throughout the country. Our partnership model may provide a useful framework for cancer outcomes research projects in rural communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Cancer Research among Minorities and the Medically Underserved. (1999). The unequal burden of cancer: An assessment of NIH research and programs for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kinsey, T., Jemal, A., Liff, J., Ward, E., & Thun, M. (2007). Trends in mortality from four major cancers by education, United States, 1993–2001 American Association for cancer research. First conference on the science of cancer health disparities Atlanta, GA.

  3. Menck, H. R., Cunningham, M. P., Jessup, J. M., Eyre, H. J., Winchester, D. P., Scott-Conner, C. E., et al. (1997). The growth and maturation of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer, 80(12), 2296–2304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Center for Health Policy Research and Ethics, C. (2000). Linking rural health services research with health policy Pentagon City, VA.

  5. Fayter, D., McDaid, C., & Eastwood, A. (2007). A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(10), 990–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Engelman, K. K., Perpich, D. L., Peterson, S. L., Hall, M. A., Ellerbeck, E. F., & Stanton, A. L. (2005). Cancer information needs in rural areas. Journal of Health Communication, 10(3), 199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paskett, E. D., Cooper, M. R., Stark, N., Ricketts, T. C., Tropman, S., Hatzell, T., et al. (2002). Clinical trial enrollment of rural patients with cancer. Cancer Practice, 10(1), 28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Couto, R., Simpson, N., & Harris, G. (1994). Sowing seeds in the mountains: Community based coalitions for cancer prevention and control. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute. NIH Publication No. 94-3779.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez, D., Chen, M., Maddox, Y., Boyce, C., Burhansstipanov, L., Clanton, M., Freeman, H., Gines, V., Hiatt, R., Howard, G, et al. (2004). Making cancer health disparities history: Report to the trans-HHS cancer health disparities progress review group. Washington, DC.

  10. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). 2000 Census of population and housing, summary population and housing characteristics, PHC-1-12, Georgia. Washington, DC.

  11. Georgia Department of Human Resources, and Health, Division of Public Health. (2006). Georgia comprehensive cancer registry policy and procedure manual for reporting facilities. Atlanta, GA.

  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Facts about the PRC Program. Retrieved 12/28/2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/prc/about-prc-program/facts-about-prc-program.htm.

  13. Ramsey, S., Zeliadt, S., Hall, I., Ekwueme, D., & Penson, D. (2007). On the importance of race, socioeconomic status and comorbidity when evaluating quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Journal of Urology, 177(6), 1992–1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilliland, F. D., Hoffman, R. M., Hamilton, A., Albertsen, P., Eley, J. W., Harlan, L., et al. (1999). Predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer in men treated with radical prostatectomy: Results from the population based prostate cancer outcomes study. Journal of Urology, 162(4), 1341–1345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Potosky, A. L., Harlan, L. C., Stanford, J. L., Gilliland, F. D., Hamilton, A. S., Albertsen, P. C., et al. (1999). Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: The prostate cancer outcomes study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91(20), 1719–1724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Potosky, A. L., Legler, J., Albertsen, P. C., Stanford, J. L., Gilliland, F. D., Hamilton, A. S., et al. (2000). Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92(19), 1582–1592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanford, J. L., Feng, Z., Hamilton, A. S., Gilliland, F. D., Stephenson, R. A., Eley, J. W., et al. (2000). Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: The prostate cancer outcomes study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(3), 354–360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Duyn, M. A., Reuben, S. H., & Macario, E. (2006). Special populations networks: Themes and lessons learned. Cancer, 107(Suppl. 8), 1945–1954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gany, F. M., Shah, S. M., & Changrani, J. (2006). New York city’s immigrant minorities. Reducing cancer health disparities. Cancer, 107(Suppl. 8), 2071–2081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, M. S., Shinagawa, S. M., Bal, D. G., Bastani, R., Chow, E. A., Ho, R. C., et al. (2006). Asian American network for cancer awareness, research, and training’s legacy. The first 5 years. Cancer, 107(Suppl. 8), 2006–2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaur, J. S., Dignan, M., Burhansstipanov, L., Baukol, P., & Claus, C. (2006). The “Spirit of Eagles” legacy. Cancer, 107(Suppl. 8), 1987–1994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baquet, C. R., Mack, K. M., Bramble, J., DeShields, M., Datcher, D., Savoy, M., et al. (2005). Maryland’s special populations cancer network: Cancer health disparities reduction model. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 16(2), 192–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baquet, C. R., Mack, K. M., Mishra, S. I., Bramble, J., Deshields, M., Datcher, D., et al. (2006). Maryland’s special populations network. A model for cancer disparities research, education, and training. Cancer, 107(Suppl. 8), 2061–2070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Partridge, E. E., Fouad, M. N., Hinton, A. W., Hardy, C. M., Liscovicz, N., White-Johnson, F., et al. (2005). The Deep South network for cancer control: Eliminating cancer disparities through community-academic collaboration. Family and Community Health, 28(1), 6–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lisovicz, N., Johnson, R. E., Higginbotham, J., Downey, J. A., Hardy, C. M., Fouad, M. N., et al. (2006). The Deep South network for cancer control. Building a community infrastructure to reduce cancer health disparities. Cancer, 107(Suppl. 8), 1971–1979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, and Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. (2006). National comprehensive cancer control program 2006/2007. Atlanta, GA.

  27. Niederhuber, J. (2007). The nation’s investment in cancer research: A plan and budget proposal for fiscal year 2008 (NIH Publication No. 06–6090). Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Goodman.

Additional information

Funding was made possible by cooperative agreement # U48 DP 000043 for the Emory Prevention Research Center, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, M., Almon, L., Bayakly, R. et al. Cancer Outcomes Research in a Rural Area: A Multi-Institution Partnership Model. J Community Health 34, 23–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-008-9123-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-008-9123-7

Keywords

Navigation