Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public Stigma and the Label of Gambling Disorder: Does it Make a Difference?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined public gambling stigma by testing stigmatization of those diagnosed with a gambling disorder, as specified by the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association in Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm16). The researchers hypothesized that the magnitude of stigmatization would fall in this order, from most stigmatized to least: (a) the target labelled and described in ways consistent with moderate gambling disorder (b) the target described in ways consistent with moderate gambling disorder, (c) the target described in ways consistent with recreational gambling, (d) and control. Participants were randomly presented with one of the four descriptions, then completed measures of cognitive, affective, and behavioral reactions. Results showed that those labelled with gambling disorder evoked slightly more social distance than those meeting criteria for the disorder with no label. However, both groups meeting criteria were more stigmatized than those who gamble without meeting criteria and those who do not gamble. Those described who gamble without meeting criteria were no more stigmatized than those who do not gamble, giving a more total picture of what gambling stigma is by indicating what it is not. Findings and implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Billy A. Palmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Billy Palmer declares that he has no conflict of interest. Eric Richardson declares that he has no conflict of interest. Martin Heesacker declares that he has no conflict of interest. M. Kristina DePue declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Appendix: Vignettes

Appendix: Vignettes

Unlabeled Moderate Gambling Disorder

Steve has been gambling money on slot machines for a few years. Starting a little over a year ago, he’s been increasing the amount that he gambles to achieve his desired level of fun. Often, he tries to save money by cutting back on the time he spends gambling. During these times, he feels restless. His significant other often expresses concern for his gambling and threatens to end the relationship. After these conflicts Steve, gambles more. Steve occasionally has asked for advances on his paycheck to be able to continue to gamble. While at work, he finds himself persistently thinking of gambling.

Labelled Moderate Gambling Disorder

Steve has been gambling money on slot machines for a few years. Starting a little over a year ago, he’s been increasing the amount that he gambles to achieve his desired level of fun. Often, he tries to save money by cutting back on the time he spends gambling. During these times, he feels restless. His significant other often expresses concern for his gambling and threatens to end the relationship. After these conflicts Steve, gambles more. Steve occasionally has asked for advances on his paycheck to be able to continue to gamble. While at work, he finds himself persistently thinking of gambling. Steve has been diagnosed with a moderate gambling disorder by a psychologist.

Recreational Gambling

Steve has been gambling money on slot machines for a few years. He gambles the same amount every time he goes to achieve his desired level of fun. Often, he cuts back on the time he spends gambling to save money. His significant other does not have an issue with his gambling. Steve does not gamble when he is feeling stressed. Steve has a job and is focused while at work.

Control

Steve has been playing tennis for a few years. He plays tennis once a week. Often, he cuts back on the time he plays tennis to spend time elsewhere. His significant other does not have an issue with his tennis playing. Steve plays tennis to cope with stress. Steve has a job and is focused while at work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer, B.A., Richardson, E.J., Heesacker, M. et al. Public Stigma and the Label of Gambling Disorder: Does it Make a Difference?. J Gambl Stud 34, 1281–1291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9735-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9735-x

Keywords

Navigation