Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 835–845 | Cite as

Cognitive and Performance Enhancing Medication Use to Improve Performance in Poker

  • Joshua Caballero
  • Raymond L. Ownby
  • Jose A. Rey
  • Kevin A. Clauson
Original Paper

Abstract

Use of neuroenhancers has been studied in groups ranging from students to surgeons; however, use of cognitive and performance enhancing medications (CPEMs) to improve performance in poker has remained largely overlooked. To assess the use of CPEMs to improve poker performance, a survey of poker players was conducted. Participants were recruited via Internet poker forums; 198 completed the online survey. Approximately 28 % of respondents used prescription CPEMs, with the most commonly used including: amphetamine/dextroamphetamine (62 %), benzodiazepines (20 %), and methylphenidate (20 %). CPEMs were used in poker to focus (73 %), calm nerves (11 %), and stay awake (11 %). Caffeine (71 %), as well as conventionally counter-intuitive substances like marijuana (35 %) and alcohol (30 %) were also reported to enhance poker performance. Non-users of CPEMs were dissuaded from use due to not knowing where to get them (29 %), apprehension about trying them (26 %), and legal or ethical concerns (16 %). Respondents most frequently acquired CPEMs via friends/fellow poker players (52 %), or prescription from physician (38 %). Additionally, greater use of CPEMs was associated with living outside the United States (p = 0.042), prior use of prescription medications for improving non-poker related performance (p < 0.001), and amateur and semi-professional player status (p = 0.035). Unmonitored use of pharmacologically active agents and their methods of acquisition highlight safety concerns in this cohort of poker players, especially among non-professional players. The current state of guidance from national organizations on CPEM use in healthy individuals could impact prescribing patterns.

Keywords

Cognition Gambling Medications Neuroenhancer Poker 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest. No financial support was received for this study.

References

  1. British Medical Association. (2007). Boosting your brainpower: Ethical aspects of cognitive enhancements. A discussion paper from the British Medical Association.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S. C., & Mitchell, L. A. (2010). An observational investigation of poker style and the five-factor personality model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 229–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Browne, B. R. (1989). Going on tilt: Frequent poker players and control. Journal of Gambling Studies, 5(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell, J. A., Caldwell, J. L., Smythe, N. K., & Hall, K. K. (2000). A double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of the efficacy of modafinil for sustaining the alertness and performance of aviators: A helicopter simulator study. Psychopharmacologia, 150(3), 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerullo, M. (2006). Cosmetic psychopharmacology and the president’s council on bioethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49(4), 515–523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, A. (2004). Cosmetic neurology: The controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology, 63(6), 968–974.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterjee, A. (2007). Cosmetic neurology and cosmetic surgery: Parallels, predictions, and challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16(2), 129–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterjee, A. (2009). Is it acceptable for people to take methylphenidate to enhance performance? No. British Medical Journal, 338, b1956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DeSantis, A. D., Webb, E. M., & Noar, S. M. (2008). Illicit use of prescription ADHD medications on a college campus: A multimethodological approach. Journal of American College Health, 57(3), 315–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupont, R. L., Coleman, J. J., Bucher, R. H., & Wilford, B. B. (2008). Characteristics and motives of college students who engage in nonmedical use of methylphenidate. The American Journal on Addictions, 17(3), 167–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. European Alliance for Access to Safe Medicines (2008). The counterfeiting superhighway. Retrieved July 28, 2015, from http://asop.eu/cache/downloads/dqqt3sge9hwssgcgcos440g40/CS%20for%20ASOP%20website.pdf.
  12. Farah, M. J., Illes, J., Cook-Deegan, R., Gardner, H., Kandel, E., et al. (2004). Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(5), 421–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Franke, A. G., Bagusat, C., Dietz, P., Hoffmann, I., Simon, P., Ulrich, R., & Lieb, K. (2013). Use of illicit and prescription drugs for cognitive or mood enhancement among surgeons. BMC Medicine, 11, 102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, J. (2009). Is it acceptable for people to take methylphenidate to enhance performance? Yes. British Medical Journal, 338, b1955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayano, D. M. (1977). The professional poker player: Career identification and the problem of respectability. Social Problems, 24(5), 556–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hopley, A. A. B., & Nicki, R. M. (2010). Predictive factors of online poker playing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(4), 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johansen-Berg, H., & Walsh, V. (2001). Cognitive neuroscience: Who to play at poker. Current Biology, 11(7), R261–R263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, S. B., Blum, R. W., & Giedd, J. N. (2009). Adolescent maturity and the brain: The promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), 216–221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kairouz, S., Paradis, C., & Nadeau, L. (2012). Are online gamblers more at risk than offline gamblers? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(3), 175–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Bouvard, A., Achab, S., & Zullino, D. (2013). Internet poker websites and pathological gambling prevention policy. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(1), 51–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Larriviere, D., Williams, M. A., Rizzo, M., Bonnie, R. J., & AAN Ethics Law and Humanities Committee. (2009). Responding to requests from adult patients for neuroenhancements: Guidance of the Ethics. Law and Humanities Committee. Neurology, 73(17), 1406–1412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Maher, B. (2008). Poll results: Look who’s doping. Nature, 452(7188), 674–675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Matusow, M., Calistri, A., & Lavalli, T. (2009). Check-raising the devil. Las Vegas: Cardoza Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. McCabe, S. E., Knight, J. R., Teter, C. J., & Wechsler, H. (2005). Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: Prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction, 100(1), 96–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitrovic, D. V., & Brown, J. (2009). Poker mania and problem gambling, a study of distorted cognitions, motivation, an alexithymia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 489–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Neftel, K. A., Adler, R. H., Käppeli, L., Rossi, M., Dolder, M., et al. (1982). Stage fright in musicians: A model illustrating the effect of beta blockers. Psychosomatic Medicine, 44(5), 461–469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Outram, S. M. (2010). The use of methylphenidate among students: The future of enhancement? Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(4), 198–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Poker Static (2010). Mad Poker: Episode 1. Retrieved July 28, 2015 from http://www.pokerstatic.com/mad-poker/episode1/.
  29. Powell, D. H. (2004). Treating individuals with debilitating performance anxiety: An introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(8), 801–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Siler, K. (2009). Social and psychological challenges of poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Svetlov, S. I., Kobeissy, F. H., & Gold, M. S. (2007). Performance enhancing, non-prescription use of Ritalin: A comparison with amphetamines and cocaine. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 26(4), 1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Talbot, M. (2009). Brain gain: The underground world of “neuroenhancing” drugs. New Yorker, 27, 32–43.Google Scholar
  33. Teter, C. J., McCabe, S. E., Cranford, J. A., Boyd, C. J., & Guthrie, S. K. (2005). Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 53(6), 253–262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C., & Hoffman, J. H. (2008). The prevalence of problem gambling among U.S. adolescents and young adults: Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(2), 119–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C., & Hoffman, J. H. (2009). The association of form of gambling with problem gambling among American youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 105–112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. White, B. P., Becker-Blease, K. A., & Grace-Bishop, K. (2006). Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 54(5), 261–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, R. T., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yesavage, J. A., Mumenthaler, M. S., Taylor, J. L., Friedman, L., O’Hara, R., et al. (2002). Donepezil and flight simulator performance: Effects on retention of complex skills. Neurology, 59(1), 123–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yusko, D. A., Buckman, J. F., White, H. R., & Pandina, R. J. (2008). Alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, and performance enhancers: A comparison of use by college student athletes and nonathletes. Journal of American College Health, 57(3), 281–290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of PharmacyNova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA
  2. 2.College of Osteopathic MedicineNova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of PharmacyLipscomb UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations