Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1405–1415 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Risk Aversion Among Chinese University Students

  • Desmond Lam
Original Paper


This paper examines gender differences in risk aversion among Chinese university students. Chinese females are proposed to be more risk averse and require a higher risk premium when faced with a gamble option in the gain-domain frame as compared to Chinese males. Two groups of 100 participants each (male = 100 and female = 100 in total) were recruited to fill up questionnaires that included items relating to objective probability lotteries. Within each group, it was found that Chinese males and females did not differ in their risk aversion. However, results show that Chinese males tend to react more readily to rising risk premium by taking up options with higher expected values when compared to Chinese females. Current findings will have useful implications to marketers (particularly, promoters of gambling products) and problem gambling counselors.


Risk premium Risk-taking Gender differences 


  1. Arch, E. (1993). Risk-taking: A motivational basis for sex differences. Psychological Reports, 73(3), 6–11.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. (1992). Reckless behaviour in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, J. D., & Baldwin, J. I. (1988). Factors affecting AIDS-related sexual risk taking behavior among college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barke, R. P., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Slovic, P. (1997). Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 167–176.Google Scholar
  6. Bechara, A. (2003). Risky business: Emotion, decision-making, and addiction. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 23–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S. (2001). Gender, risk and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 345–356.Google Scholar
  8. Blaszczynski, A., Huynh, S., Dumlao, V. J., & Farrell, E. (1998). Problem gambling within a Chinese speaking community. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 359–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyer, T. W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26, 291–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks, P., & Zank, H. (2005). Loss averse behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31(3), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrnes, J., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Demaree, H. A., DeDonno, M. A., Burns, K. J., Feldman, P., & Everhart, D. E. (2009). Trait dominance predicts risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dreber, A., & Hoffman, M. (2007). Risk preferences are partly predetermined. Mimeo: Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Dwyer, P. D., Gilkeson, J. H., & List, J. A. (2002). Gender differences in revealed risk-taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors. Economics Letters, 76, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckel, C. C., & Grossma, P. J. (2008). Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. In R. P. Charles & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results (pp. 1061–1073). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Economist (2011). Currency comparisons, to go. Retrieved from
  18. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1990). The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 496–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fehr-Duda, H., de Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60(2–3), 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flynn, J. H., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101–1108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fong, L. H. N., Law, R., & Lam, D. (2013). An examination of factors driving Chinese gamblers’ fallacy bias. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9.
  22. Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Sydnor, J. (2011). Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goetzmann, W. N., & Ibbotson, R. G. (2006). The equity risk premium: Essays and explorations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gustafso, P. E. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspective. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, C. R., Jenkins, M., & Glaser, D. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
  26. Holton, G. A. (2004). Defining risk. Financial Analysis Journal, 60, 19–25.Google Scholar
  27. Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobsen, B., Lee, J. B., & Marquering, W. A. (2008). Are men more optimistic? Retrieved from
  29. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Conway, C. A., Welling, L. L. M., & Smith, F. (2007). Sensation seeking and men’s face preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Who dares, wins: Heroism versus altruism in women’s mate choice. Human Nature, 12(2), 89–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kermer, D. A., Driver-Linn, E., Wilson, T. D., & Daniel, T. G. (2006). Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17(8), 649–653.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lam, D. (2009). The world of chinese gambling. Adelaide: Peacock Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Lam, D. (2014). Chopsticks and gambling. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Lam, D., & Ozorio, Bernadete. (2013). The effect of prior outcomes on gender risk-taking differences. Journal of Risk Research. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2012.737824.
  36. Larkin, J. E., & Pines, H. A. (2003). Gender and risk in public performance. Sex Roles, 49, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lau, L. Y., & Ranyard, R. (2005). Chinese and English probabilistic thinking and risk taking in gambling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(5), 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loo, J., Oei, T. P., & Raylu, N. (2011). Problem gambling, gambling correlates, and help-seeking attitudes in a Chinese Sample: An empirical evaluation. Psychology, 2(4), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., & Punccohar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meier-Pesti, K., & Penz, E. (2008). Sex or gender? Expanding the sex-based view by introducing masculinity and femininity as predictors of financial risk taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mongin, P. (1997). Expected utility theory. In J. Davis, W. Hands, & U. Maki (Eds.), Handbook of economic methodology (pp. 342–350). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  42. Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olsen, R. A., & Cox, C. M. (2001). The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: The case of professional investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ozorio, B., & Fong, D. K. C. (2004). Chinese casino gambling behaviors: Risk taking in casinos vs. investments. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 8(2), 27–38.Google Scholar
  45. Pavlov, D., Kelevedjiev, E., & Tabov, J. (2008). Risk-taking behavior in Math competitions. Mathematics Competitions, 21(2), 45–60.Google Scholar
  46. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ronay, R., & Kim, D. Y. (2006). Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 397–419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt, U., & Traub, S. (2004). An experimental test of loss aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(3), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schubert, R., Gysler, M., Brown, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (2000). Gender specific attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: An experimental investigation. Retrieved from
  50. Sheng, C. L. (1998). A utilitarian general theory of value—Value inquiry book series 61. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  51. Skeel, R. L., Neudecker, J., Pilarski, C., & Pytlak, K. (2007). The utility of personality variables and behaviourally-based measures in the prediction of risk-taking behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spigner, C., Hawkins, W., & Lorens, W. (1993). Gender differences in perception of risk associated with alcohol and drug use among college students. Women and Health, 20(1), 87–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner, C., & McClure, R. (2003). Age and gender differences in risk taking behavior as an explanation for high incidence of motor vehicle crashes as a driver in young males. Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 10, 123–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Vong, F. (2007). The psychology of risk-taking in gambling among Chinese visitors to Macau. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Sokolowska, J. (1998). What folklore tells us about risk and risk taking: Cross-cultural comparisons of American, German, and Chinese proverbs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(2), 170–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk-taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zinkhan, G. M., & Karande, K. W. (1991). Culture and gender differences in risk taking behavior among American and Spanish decision makers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 741–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999–1025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of MacauTaipaMacau S.A.R., China

Personalised recommendations