Gender Differences in Risk Aversion Among Chinese University Students
- 363 Downloads
This paper examines gender differences in risk aversion among Chinese university students. Chinese females are proposed to be more risk averse and require a higher risk premium when faced with a gamble option in the gain-domain frame as compared to Chinese males. Two groups of 100 participants each (male = 100 and female = 100 in total) were recruited to fill up questionnaires that included items relating to objective probability lotteries. Within each group, it was found that Chinese males and females did not differ in their risk aversion. However, results show that Chinese males tend to react more readily to rising risk premium by taking up options with higher expected values when compared to Chinese females. Current findings will have useful implications to marketers (particularly, promoters of gambling products) and problem gambling counselors.
KeywordsRisk premium Risk-taking Gender differences
- Arch, E. (1993). Risk-taking: A motivational basis for sex differences. Psychological Reports, 73(3), 6–11.Google Scholar
- Barke, R. P., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Slovic, P. (1997). Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 167–176.Google Scholar
- Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S. (2001). Gender, risk and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 345–356.Google Scholar
- Dreber, A., & Hoffman, M. (2007). Risk preferences are partly predetermined. Mimeo: Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Economist (2011). Currency comparisons, to go. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/07/big-mac-index.
- Fong, L. H. N., Law, R., & Lam, D. (2013). An examination of factors driving Chinese gamblers’ fallacy bias. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9390-9.
- Goetzmann, W. N., & Ibbotson, R. G. (2006). The equity risk premium: Essays and explorations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gustafso, P. E. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspective. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.Google Scholar
- Harris, C. R., Jenkins, M., & Glaser, D. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
- Holton, G. A. (2004). Defining risk. Financial Analysis Journal, 60, 19–25.Google Scholar
- Jacobsen, B., Lee, J. B., & Marquering, W. A. (2008). Are men more optimistic? Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030478.
- Lam, D. (2009). The world of chinese gambling. Adelaide: Peacock Publications.Google Scholar
- Lam, D. (2014). Chopsticks and gambling. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lam, D., & Ozorio, Bernadete. (2013). The effect of prior outcomes on gender risk-taking differences. Journal of Risk Research. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2012.737824.
- Mongin, P. (1997). Expected utility theory. In J. Davis, W. Hands, & U. Maki (Eds.), Handbook of economic methodology (pp. 342–350). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Ozorio, B., & Fong, D. K. C. (2004). Chinese casino gambling behaviors: Risk taking in casinos vs. investments. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 8(2), 27–38.Google Scholar
- Pavlov, D., Kelevedjiev, E., & Tabov, J. (2008). Risk-taking behavior in Math competitions. Mathematics Competitions, 21(2), 45–60.Google Scholar
- Schubert, R., Gysler, M., Brown, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (2000). Gender specific attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: An experimental investigation. Retrieved from http://www.cer.ethz.ch/research/wp_00_17.pdf.
- Sheng, C. L. (1998). A utilitarian general theory of value—Value inquiry book series 61. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar