Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Gambling and Personality: Results from a Representative Swedish Sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The association between personality and gambling has been explored previously. However, few studies are based on representative populations. This study aimed at examining the association between risk gambling and personality in a representative Swedish population. A random Swedish sample (N = 19,530) was screened for risk gambling using the Lie/Bet questionnaire. The study sample (N = 257) consisted of those screening positive on Lie/Bet and completing a postal questionnaire about gambling and personality (measured with the NODS–PERC and the HP5i respectively). Risk gambling was positively correlated with Negative Affectivity (a facet of Neuroticism) and Impulsivity (an inversely related facet of Conscientiousness), but all associations were weak. When taking age and gender into account, there were no differences in personality across game preference groups, though preferred game correlated with level of risk gambling. Risk gamblers scored lower than the population norm data with respect to Negative Affectivity, but risk gambling men scored higher on Impulsivity. The association between risk gambling and personality found in previous studies was corroborated in this study using a representative sample. We conclude that risk and problem gamblers should not be treated as a homogeneous group, and prevention and treatment interventions should be adapted according to differences in personality, preferred type of game and the risk potential of the games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since data are on ordinal level Spearman’s correlations and Spearman’s partial correlations were conducted. Only small differences were found, and no differences in significance, and are therefore not reported.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Text (vol. Washington). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Journal of Psychiatry. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013b). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.).

  • Bagby, R. M., Vachon, D. D., Bulmash, E. L., Toneatto, T., Quilty, L. C., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Pathological gambling and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 873–880. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 97(5), 487–499. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boman, U., Engdahl, B., Gustafsson, N.-K., Hradilova Selin, K., & Ramstedt, M. (2006). Alkoholkonsumtionen i Sverige fram till år 2005. Stockholm. Retrieved from http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:513943.

  • Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–90. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8250684.

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assesment Resourses, Inc.

  • Eysenck, H.-J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 16, pp. 244–276).

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological bullentin, 116 (3), 429–456.

  • Forbush, K. T., Shaw, M., Graeber, M. a, Hovick, L., Meyer, V. J., Moser, D. J., … Black, D. W. (2008). Neuropsychological characteristics and personality traits in pathological gambling. CNS Spectrums, 13(4), 306–15. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18408650.

  • Fortune, E. E., & Goodie, A. S. (2010). The relationship between pathological gambling and sensation seeking: the role of subscale scores. Journal of Gambling Studies/Co-Sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, 26, 331–346. doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9162-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 816–821. doi:10.1037/a0032822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, J. P., Eriksson, A.-K., Hilding, A., Gunnarsson, M., & Ostensson, C.-G. (2008). Measurement invariance of personality traits from a five-factor model perspective: multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the HP5 inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 459–467. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00654.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, J. P., Jönsson, E. G., Linder, J., & Weinryb, R. M. (2003). The HP5 inventory: definition and assessment of five health-relevant personality traits from a five-factor model perspective. Personality and Individual Differences,. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00142-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, J. P., Weinryb, R. M., Göransson, S., Pedersen, N. L., & Åsberg, M. (1997). Stability and predictive ability of personality traits across 9 years. Personality and Individual Differences,. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00268-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., Odlaug, B. L., & Götestam, K. G. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies/Co-Sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, 25(1), 67–92. doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9088-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R., Nora, R. M., Tan, B., Eisenstein, N., & Engelhart, C. (1997). The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychological Reports, 80, 83–88. doi:10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3f.1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maclaren, V. V., Fugelsang, J. A., Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. J. (2011). The personality of pathological gamblers: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1057–1067. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B., & Schütz, A. (2005). Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self- and observer ratings. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 959–984. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00335.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. R., & Zuckerman, M. (2003). The relationship of impulsive sensation seeking and gender to interest and participation in gambling activities. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1385–1400. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00357-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G., Fiebig, M., Häfeli, J., & Mörsen, C. (2011). Development of an assessment tool to evaluate the risk potential of different gambling types. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 221–236. doi:10.1080/14459795.2011.584890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 616–621. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrseth, H., Pallesen, S., Molde, H., Johnsen, B. H., & Lorvik, I. M. (2009). Personality factors as predictors of pathological gambling. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 933–937. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Institute of Public Health. (2010). Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2008/2009. Östersund: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104, 250–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, B., Morgenstern, M., & Hanewinkel, R. (2012). Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: Personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming. European Addiction Research, 18(4), 167–174. doi:10.1159/000335662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 323–335. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., & Teta, P. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 757–768. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by Svenska Spel. We declare no conflict of interest. We are grateful for valuable comments on the manuscript by professor Jan Blomqvist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Sundqvist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sundqvist, K., Wennberg, P. Risk Gambling and Personality: Results from a Representative Swedish Sample. J Gambl Stud 31, 1287–1295 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9473-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9473-2

Keywords

Navigation