Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1487–1503 | Cite as

Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Predict Attentional Bias in Non-problem Gamblers

  • Leigh D. Grant
  • Alison C. Bowling
Original Paper


Problem gambling has been identified as a public health concern in Australia, and a considerable proportion of regular gamblers may be at risk of developing gambling related problems. Attentional bias to salient cues has been observed in substance addictions, and to some extent, in problem gamblers. This bias appears to be indicative of an increase in sensitisation to salient cues as a result of continued reforcement of a related behaviour. To test for an attentional bias to gambling-related stimuli in non-problem gamblers, the relationships between gambling frequency, gambling attitudes and beliefs (GABS-23), and attentional bias were investigated. Participants (N = 38) viewed simultaneous pairs of gambling-related and neutral images and performed a dot probe task, during which their eye-movements were recorded. This enabled both direct and indirect measures of attentional bias to be obtained. Gambling frequency and GABS-23 scores predicted both direct and indirect measures of a bias in the maintenance of attention to gambling cues. No bias in attentional engagement was found. These results suggest that regular gamblers who have not yet developed any related problems show signs of sensitisation to gambling cues and may be at risk of progressing further towards problem gambling.


Attentional bias Gambling Attitudes Eye-tracking 


  1. Abbott, M. W., & Clarke, D. (2007). Prospective problem gambling research: Contribution and potential. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 123–144. doi: 10.1080/14459790701261714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouju, G., Hardouin, J.-B., Boutin, C., Gorwood, P., Bourvellec, J.-D. L., Feuillet, F., et al. (2013). A shorter and multidimensional version of the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (GABS-23). Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9356-3.
  5. Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). `Chasing’ in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1097–1111. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00052-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Bechara, A., Laloyaux, C., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., et al. (2011). Time course of attentional bias for gambling information in problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 675–682. doi: 10.1037/a0024201.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Castellanos, E. H., Charboneau, E., Dietrich, M. S., Park, S., Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., et al. (2009). Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images: evidence for altered reward system function. International Journal of Obesity, 33(9), 1063–1073. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, P. J., Macleod, C., & Guastella, A. J. (2013). Assessing the role of spatial engagement and disengagement of attention in anxiety-linked attentional bias: A critique of current paradigms and suggestions for future research directions. Anxiety Stress Coping, 26(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.638054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickerson, M., McMillen, J., Hallebone, E., Volberg, R., & Woolley, R. (1997). Definition and incidence of problem gambling, including the socio-economic distribution of problem gamblers. Melbourne: Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority. ISBN 9780731108299.Google Scholar
  10. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (submitted).Google Scholar
  11. Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97(1–2), 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Field, M., Munafò, M. R., & Franken, I. H. A. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 589–607. doi: 10.1037/a0015843.
  13. Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hing, N., & Nisbet, S. (2010). A qualitative perspective on physical, social and cognitive accessibility to gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues 101–120. doi:  10.4309/jgi.2010.24.7.
  15. Holtgraves, T. (2009). Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 105–120. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hønsi, A., Mentzoni, R. A., Molde, H., & Pallesen, S. (2013). Attentional bias in problem gambling: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 359–375. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9315-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klinger, E., & Cox, W. M. (2004). Motivation and the theory of current concern. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 3–27). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Korn, D., Gibbins, R., & Azmier, J. (2003). Framing public policy towards a public health paradigm for gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 235–256. doi: 10.1023/A:1023685416816.
  19. Lyk-Jensen, S. V. (2010). New evidence from the grey area: Danish results for at-risk gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 455–467. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9173-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Messerlian, C., & Derevensky, J. L. (2005).Youth gambling: A public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14. doi:  10.4309/jgi.2005.14.9.
  21. Molde, H., Pallesen, S., Sætrevik, B., Hammerborg, D. K., Laberg, J. C., & Johnsen, B.-H. (2010). Attentional biases among pathological gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1080/14459791003652501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oh, H., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2001). Volitional degrees of gambling behaviors. Annals of Tourism Research, 28, 618–637. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00066-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozga, D., & Brown, J. (2002). Pathological gambling. Identification and treatment. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 40(3), 22–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: An overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3181–3189. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Productivity Commission. (2010). Australia’s Gambling Industries (vol 1). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. doi: 10.1007/s11469-013-9432-7.
  26. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001). Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction, 96(1), 103–114. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.9611038.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3137–3146. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaffer, H., & Korn, D. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Strong, D. R., Breen, R. B., & Lejuez, C. W. (2004). Using item response theory to examine gambling attitudes and beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1515–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1595–1608. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas, S., Lewis, S., Duong, J., & McLeod, C. (2012a). Sports betting marketing during sporting events: A stadium and broadcast census of Australian Football League matches. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36, 145–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00856.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas, S. L., Lewis, S., McLeod, C., & Haycock, J. (2012b). ‘They are working every angle’. A qualitative study of Australian adults’ attitudes towards, and interactions with, gambling industry marketing strategies. International Gambling Studies, 12, 111–127. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2011.639381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas, S. L., Lewis, S., Westberg, K., & Derevensky, J. (2013). What influences the beliefs, behaviours and consumption patterns of ‘moderate risk’ gamblers? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 474–489. doi: 10.1007/s11469-013-9432-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vizcaino, E. J. V., Fernandez-Navarro, P., Blanco, C., Ponce, G., Navio, M., Moratti, S., et al. (2013). Maintenance of attention and pathological gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 861–867. doi: 10.1037/a0032656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wynne, H. (2003). Introducing the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Edmonton, AB: Wynne Resources.Google Scholar
  36. Yi, S., & Kanetkar, V. (2010). Implicit measures of attitudes toward gambling: An exploratory study. Journal of Gambling Issues 140–163. doi:  10.4309/jgi.2010.24.9.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health and Human SciencesSouthern Cross UniversityCoffs HarbourAustralia

Personalised recommendations