Competitiveness Facets and Sensation Seeking as Predictors of Problem Gambling Among a Sample of University Student Gamblers
- 369 Downloads
Understanding the factors that contribute to problem gambling (PG) is imperative. Individual differences in sensation seeking (SS), as measured by the Sensation Seeking Scale Form (SSS-V), have been found to be predictive of PG among university student samples. However, what is less clear, is if the four SSS-V subscales capture unique facets of SS that are particularly predictive of PG. Much less studied than SS, competitiveness has also been found to be predictive of PG. The Competitiveness Orientation Measure (COM) is a newly developed measure of competitiveness, comprising of four facets. The main purpose of the current study was to examine if these four facets of competitiveness predicted variance in PG over and above the variance predicted by the four SSS-V subscales. Participants included 158 university student gamblers. Sequential regression analysis showed that after accounting for gender, age, and the four SSS-V subscales the only facet of the COM found to be a significant predictor of PG severity was Dominant Competitiveness. Dominant Competitiveness predicted an additional 11 % of PG severity. These results provide support for the Dominant Competitiveness subscale of the COM as having utility in predicting PG over and above the predictive utility of the SSS-V subscales. Practical implications for the current findings are discussed.
KeywordsProblem gambling Competitiveness Sensation seeking University students
- Burger, T. D., Dahlgren, D., & MacDonald, C. D. (2006). College students and gambling: An examination of gender differences in motivation for participation. College Student Journal, 40(3), 704–714.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, W. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report (submitted to the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Ginsburg, G. P., Blascovich, J. J., & Howe, R. C. (1976). Risk-taking in the presence of others: Blackjack in the laboratory and in the field. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and society. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
- Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 616–621. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newby, J. (2010). The newly developed Competitiveness Orientation Measure: Psychometric development and evaluation (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 71916).Google Scholar
- Newby, J., & Klein, R. G. (in press). Competitiveness reconceptualized: Psychometric development of the competitiveness orientation measure as a unified measure of trait competitiveness. Psychological Record.Google Scholar
- Weiss, S. M., & Loubier, S. L. (2008). Gambling behaviors of former athletes: The delayed competitive effect. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 12(1/2), 53–60.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., Connolly, D., Wood, R. T., & Nowatzki, N. (2006). Gambling and problem gambling in a sample of university students. Journal of Gambling Issues, 16. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2006.16.19.