Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

The Prevalence of Problem Gambling in Denmark in 2005 and 2010: A Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Characterization

  • Ola Ekholm
  • Stig Eiberg
  • Michael Davidsen
  • Maria Holst
  • Christina V. L. Larsen
  • Knud Juel
Original Paper

Abstract

Gambling is a worldwide phenomenon. For most persons this causes only small or no problems, but for some, pathological gambling can be the result of entering the gambling environment. The objectives were to estimate the past year and lifetime prevalence of problem gambling in the adult Danish population (16 years or older) in 2010 and trends since 2005 and, furthermore, to investigate whether problem gamblers differed from non-problem gamblers with regard to sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors. Data were derived from two national representative Danish health surveys. The survey in 2005 was based on region-stratified random sample of 10,916 Danish citizens (response rate: 52.1 %) and the survey in 2010 was based on a random sample of 23,405 Danish citizens (response rate: 62.7 %). Problem gambling was defined using the lie/bet questionnaire. The past year prevalence of problem gamblers in Denmark remained stable from 2005 to 2010 (0.9 and 0.8 %, respectively). The highest past year prevalence of problem gamblers was found among young men in both 2005 and 2010. Furthermore, problem gamblers were more prevalent among men, disability pensioners, less educated and those not married or cohabiting. The present study indicates that a high level of education and being employed have a protective effect against problem gambling. More research is needed in order to understand what attracts and maintains the interest of men in gambling environments as well as why women are not occupied by gambling in the same degree as men.

Keywords

Gambling Demography Health survey Prevalence study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.

Conflicts of interests

None declared.

References

  1. Abbott, M. W., Williams, M. M., & Volberg, R. A. (2004). A prospective study of problem and regular nonproblem gamblers living in the community. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(6), 855–884.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afifi, T. O., Cox, B. J., Martens, P. J., Sareen, J., & Enns, M. W. (2010). Demographic and social variables associated with problem gambling among men and women in Canada. Psychiatry Research, 178(2), 395–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, D. T., Stefanovics, E. A., Desai, R. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2011). Gambling problem severity and psychiatric disorders among Hispanic and white adults: Findings from a nationally representative sample. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(3), 404–411.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkman, L., & Kawachi, I. (Eds.). (2000). Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bonke, J., & Borregaard, K. (2006). Ludomani i Danmark. Udbredelsen af pengespil og problemspillere. København: Socialforskningsinstituttet.Google Scholar
  8. Bonke, J., & Borregaard, K. (2009). The prevalence of problematic gambling behaviour: A Scandinavian comparison. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(6), 654–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, A. I., Ekholm, O., Davidsen, M., & Juel, K. (2012). Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark 2010 & udviklingen siden 1987. København: Statens Institut for Folkesundhed, Syddansk Universitet.Google Scholar
  10. Delfabbro, P. H. (2008). Australasian gambling review. Third Edition (19922007). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority.Google Scholar
  11. Ekholm, O., Hesse, U., Davidsen, M., & Kjøller, M. (2009). The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(7), 758–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gebauer, L., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: A brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(2), 82–90.Google Scholar
  13. Götestam, K. G., & Johansson, A. (2003). Characteristics of gambling and problematic gambling in the Norwegian context: A DSM-IV-based telephone interview study. Addictive Behaviors, 28(1), 189–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Götestam, K. G., Johansson, A., Wenzel, H. G., & Simonsen, I. E. (2004). Validation of the lie/bet screen for pathological gambling on two normal population data sets. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 1009–1013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodgins, D. C., Wynne, H., & Makarchuk, K. (1999). Pathways to recovery from gambling problems: Follow-up from a general population survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, E. E., & Hamer, R. M. (1998). The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychological Reports, 83(3 Pt 2), 1219–1224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R., Nora, R. M., Tan, B., Eisenstein, N., & Engelhart, C. (1997). The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 83–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., et al. (2008). DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kun, B., Balázs, H., Arnold, P., Paksi, B., & Demetrovics, Z. (2012). Gambling in Western and Eastern Europe: The example of Hungary. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(1), 27–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., & Giroux, I. (1999). Prevalence of problem gambling: A replication study 7 years later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44(8), 802–804.Google Scholar
  21. Linnet, J. (2009). Denmark. In: Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffiths, M. (Eds.), Problem gambling in Europe. Challenges, prevention and interventions (pp. 17–36). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Lund, I. (2007). Lessons from the grey area: A closer inspection of at-risk gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 409–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyk-Jensen, S. V. (2010). New evidence from the grey area: Danish results for at-risk gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 455–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morasco, B. J., Pietrzak, R. H., Blanco, C., Grant, B. F., Hasin, D., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Health problems and medical utilization associated with gambling disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(6), 976–984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1369–1376.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sproston, K., Erens, R., & Orford, J. (2000). Gambling behaviour in Britain: Results from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  28. Swedish National Institute of Public Health. (2011). SWELOGS, Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study. Östersund: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.Google Scholar
  29. Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(4), 250–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  31. Whittaker, J. (2009). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Wiebe, J., & Volberg, R. A. (2007). Problem gambling prevalence research: A critical overview. A report to the Canadian Gaming Association. Toronto: Canadian Gaming Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ola Ekholm
    • 1
  • Stig Eiberg
    • 1
  • Michael Davidsen
    • 1
  • Maria Holst
    • 1
  • Christina V. L. Larsen
    • 1
  • Knud Juel
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations