Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Observational Investigation of Poker Style and the Five-Factor Personality Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little empirical investigation has been made of the relationship between personality and gambling play style. In an observation of on-table poker behavior, this study classified 44 players competing in an amateur league (43 male; mean age 32) according to two main dimensions of play style; tight or loose and aggressive or passive. Superstitious beliefs towards the game were additionally measured. The NEO-PI-R questionnaire (Costa and McCrae, Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual, 1992) was used to measure personality according to the five-factor model. Results showed players with superstitious beliefs to be significantly higher in neuroticism and lower in conscientiousness and than those with no superstitious beliefs. Results approaching significance showed players adopting an aggressive style to be higher in extraversion than passive players and superstitious players to be lower in extraversion than non-superstitious players. Analysis of play style according to age of player revealed a significantly higher mean age among loose compared to tight players. Implications of results concerning validity of these style classifications and potential development in future work are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagby, M. R., Vachon, D. D., Bulmash, E. L., Toneatto, T., Quilty, L. C., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Pathological gambling and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M., McHenry, R., & Leigh, V. (1998). Personality and the national lottery. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaree, H. A., DeDonno, M. A., Burns, K. J., & Everhart, D. E. (2008). You bet: How personality differences affect risk-taking preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1484–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M., Cunningham, R., England, S. L., & Hinchy, J. (1991). On the determinants of persistent gambling III. Personality, prior mood and poker machine play. Substance Use and Misuse, 26(5), 531–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. W., & Grant, J. E. (2001). Personality dimensions in pathological gambling disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 104, 205–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyngdon, A., & Dickerson, M. (1999). An experimental study of the effect of prior alcohol consumption on a simulated gambling activity. Addiction, 94, 697–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakey, C. E., Rose, P., Campbell, W. K., & Goodie, A. S. (2007). Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: The mediating role of judgment and decision-making biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(2), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, J. G., Butt, S., & Blaszcynski, A. (2006). Personality and self-reported use of mobile phones for games. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 9(6), 753–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonmaker, A. N. (2000). The psychology of poker. Nevada: Two Plus Two Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2004). Measuring superstitious belief: Why lucky charms matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1533–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. S., & Clapham, M. M. (2005). Development of the drake beliefs about chance inventory. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 411–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr. Daniel Levitin and Dr. Theo Koulis for their guidance on the analysis of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK

    Steven C. Brown & Laura A. Mitchell

Authors
  1. Steven C. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura A. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura A. Mitchell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, S.C., Mitchell, L.A. An Observational Investigation of Poker Style and the Five-Factor Personality Model. J Gambl Stud 26, 229–234 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9161-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9161-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation