The Four Es 1-Year Later: A Tool for Predicting the Development of Gambling Problems
- 105 Downloads
The Four Es is a 40-item scale measuring psychological risk for the development of problem gambling behavior. One-year follow-up interviews (n = 395) from a previously reported phone survey in Queensland, Australia (n = 2,577) (Rockloff & Dyer, 2006) tested the ability of the Four Es instrument to prospectively identify persons who would later develop gambling problems. Two groups of participants were selected for the 1-year follow-up interviews, including (1) persons who had gambling problems, high-risk alcohol abuse problems, and/or substance abuse problems (abuse group); and (2) a random selection of other persons from the original survey (random group). The results indicated that the “Excess” trait, which measures impulsive behavior, was predictive of relative increases in gambling problems for both groups over the 1-year period. Additionally, the Four Es questionnaire showed good psychometric properties in the surveys, with a test-retest reliability of r = .70 and a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of α = .90 and .92 in the original and follow-up interviews, respectively.
KeywordsPersonality Gambling Four E's Comorbid
This research was supported by a grant from the Queensland Treasury Department, Australia.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4 ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Blaszcvznski, A. P., & McConaghy, N. (1989). Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gambling. International Journal of the Addictions, 24, 337–350.Google Scholar
- Boyd, W. H. (1976). Excitement: The gambler’s drug. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and Society. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
- Brown, R. I. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9–10), 1001–1016.Google Scholar
- Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (1998). Child and adolescent gambling problems: a program of research. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 55.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, D. F. (1988). A general theory of addictions: Rationale for and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. In H. J. Shatter, S. Stein, B. Gambino, & T. N. Cummings (Eds.), Compulsive Gambling Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 35–64). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.Google Scholar
- Steiner, J. (1970). An experimental study of risk taking. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 63(12), 121–132.Google Scholar