Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 467–478 | Cite as

The Four Es 1-Year Later: A Tool for Predicting the Development of Gambling Problems

Original Paper


The Four Es is a 40-item scale measuring psychological risk for the development of problem gambling behavior. One-year follow-up interviews (n = 395) from a previously reported phone survey in Queensland, Australia (n = 2,577) (Rockloff & Dyer, 2006) tested the ability of the Four Es instrument to prospectively identify persons who would later develop gambling problems. Two groups of participants were selected for the 1-year follow-up interviews, including (1) persons who had gambling problems, high-risk alcohol abuse problems, and/or substance abuse problems (abuse group); and (2) a random selection of other persons from the original survey (random group). The results indicated that the “Excess” trait, which measures impulsive behavior, was predictive of relative increases in gambling problems for both groups over the 1-year period. Additionally, the Four Es questionnaire showed good psychometric properties in the surveys, with a test-retest reliability of r = .70 and a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of α = .90 and .92 in the original and follow-up interviews, respectively.


Personality Gambling Four E's Comorbid 



This research was supported by a grant from the Queensland Treasury Department, Australia.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4 ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaszcvznski, A. P., & McConaghy, N. (1989). Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gambling. International Journal of the Addictions, 24, 337–350.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, W. H. (1976). Excitement: The gambler’s drug. In W. R. Eadington (Ed.), Gambling and Society. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R. I. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9–10), 1001–1016.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. L., Rodda, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). Differences between problem and nonproblem gamblers in subjective arousal and affective valence amongst electronic gaming machine players. Addictive Behaviors, 29(9), 1863–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers, R. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(1), 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, D. (2004). Impulsiveness, locus of control, motivation and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(4), 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (1998). Child and adolescent gambling problems: a program of research. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 55.Google Scholar
  10. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  11. Gossop, M., Darke, S., Griffiths, P., Hando, J., Powis, B., Hall, W. et al. (1995). The severity of dependence scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction, 90(5), 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollander, E., & Evers, M. (2001). New developments in impulsivity. The Lancet, 358(9286), 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ibanez, A., Blanco, C., Donahue, E., Lesieur, H. R., Perez de Castro, I., Fernandez-Piqueras, J. et al. (2001). Psychiatric comorbidity in pathological gamblers seeking treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(10), 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobs, D. F. (1988). A general theory of addictions: Rationale for and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. In H. J. Shatter, S. Stein, B. Gambino, & T. N. Cummings (Eds.), Compulsive Gambling Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 35–64). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.Google Scholar
  17. Lesieur, H. R., & Rosenthal, R. J. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature (prepared for the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV Committee on Disorders of Impulse Control Not Elsewhere Classified). Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1997). Gambling activities of young Australians: Developing a model of behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(3), 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2006). The Four Es of problem gambling: A psychological measure of risk. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction, 88(6), 791–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharpe, L. (2002). A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, J. F., & Abt, V. (1984). Gambling as play. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474(1), 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steiner, J. (1970). An experimental study of risk taking. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 63(12), 121–132.Google Scholar
  24. Vitaro, F., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Impulsivity predicts problem gambling in low SES adolescent males. Addiction, 94(4), 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whiteside, S. P., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Reynolds, S. K. (2005). Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale: A four-factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 19(7), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and SociologyCentral Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia

Personalised recommendations