Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 505–517 | Cite as

Children’s at Home: Pilot Study Assessing Dedicated Social Media for Parents of Adolescents with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

  • Christina Akre
  • Julie Polvinen
  • Nicole J. Ullrich
  • Michael Rich
Original Research


The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate Children’s at Home (C@H), a dedicated social media website for parents of adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The interventional study included two phases: (1) creating video intervention/prevention assessment (VIA) visual narratives about having an adolescent with NF1 and (2) interacting on C@H, a secure, medically moderated social media website. C@H was evaluated qualitatively at three time points. At enrollment (T0, N = 17), participants reported needing C@H to break their isolation, connect with other families, and receive accurate information, advice, and support from others facing similar challenges. At T1, after creating VIA during 6 months (N = 13, 145 videos), participants mostly valued the opportunity to speak about the challenges they face with NF1 and their journey since diagnosis. At T2, after interacting on C@H for 7 weeks (N = 10, two sign-ins/week/parent), participants reported connecting with other parents of children with NF1 for the first time, valuing the “real faces” and emotions of other parents with shared experiences providing a sense of normalcy. Qualitative analysis suggested that C@H decreased feelings of isolation, provided relief to talk about NF1 without having to explain it, provided new knowledge about NF1 and the opportunity to address non-medical issues of NF1 never discussed in clinic, and helped participants with putting their lives into perspective. C@H allowed parents of adolescents with NF1 to overcome previous isolation and connect for the first time. Innovative applications of social media dedicated to those who care for children with chronic conditions can provide peer-to-peer support, shared experience, and reliable medical information.


Social media Peer support Adolescents Parents Intervention Neurofibromatosis 



We would like to thank Kapil Patel for his work building the Children’s at Home website and the participating families.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Children’s Tumor Foundation Clinical Research Award to NU and the Swiss National Science Foundation with a doc.mobility grant for a fellowship at the Boston Children’s Hospital (grant number P1LAP3_151749) to CA.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author Akre Christina, Author Polvinen Julie, Author Ullrich Nicole J, and Author Rich Michael declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.


  1. Ainbinder, J. G., Blanchard, L. W., Singer, G. H., Sullivan, M. E., Powers, L. K., Marquis, J. G., & Santelli, B. (1998). A qualitative study of parent to parent support for parents of children with special needs. Consortium to evaluate parent to parent. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23(2), 99–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akre, C., & Suris, J. C. (2014). From controlling to letting go: what are the psychosocial needs of parents of adolescents with a chronic illness? Health Education Research, 29(5), 764–772.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akre, C., Ramelet, A. S., Berchtold, A., & Suris, J. C. (2015). Educational intervention for parents of adolescents with chronic illness: a pre-post test pilot study. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 27(3), 261–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, B., & North, K. (2004). Social skills of children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46(8), 553–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, C. M., Colley, A., Donnai, D., Kingston, H., Harris, R., & Kerzin-Storrar, L. (1993). Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): knowledge, experience, and reproductive decisions of affected patients and families. Journal of Medical Genetics, 30(7), 567–574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehaut, J. C., Kohen, D. E., Raina, P., Walter, S. D., Russell, D. J., Swinton, M., & Rosenbaum, P. (2004). The health of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: how does it compare with that of other Canadian caregivers? Pediatrics, 114(2), e182–e191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brehaut, J. C., Kohen, D. E., Garner, R. E., Miller, A. R., Lach, L. M., Klassen, A. F., & Rosenbaum, P. L. (2009). Health among caregivers of children with health problems: findings from a Canadian population-based study. American Journal of Public Health, 99(7), 1254–1262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchbinder, M. H., Detzer, M. J., Welsch, R. L., Christiano, A. S., Patashnick, J. L., & Rich, M. (2005). Assessing adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a multiple perspective pilot study using visual illness narratives and interviews. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(1), 71 e79-13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chalfen, R., & Rich, M. (2004). Applying visual research: patients teaching physicians about asthma through visual illness narratives. Visual Anthropology Review, 20(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1–20.Google Scholar
  12. Coiera, E. (2013). Social networks, social media, and social diseases. BMJ, 346, f3007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coude, F. X., Mignot, C., Lyonnet, S., & Munnich, A. (2006). Academic impairment is the most frequent complication of neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1) in children. Behavior Genetics, 36(5), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cousino, M. K., & Hazen, R. A. (2013). Parenting stress among caregivers of children with chronic illness: a systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(8), 809–828.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dilts, C. V., Carey, J. C., Kircher, J. C., Hoffman, R. O., Creel, D., Ward, K., & Leonard, C. O. (1996). Children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1: a behavioral phenotype. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 17(4), 229–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eysenbach, G. (2005). The law of attrition. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1), e11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferner, R. E. (2007). Neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2: a twenty first century perspective. Lancet Neurology, 6(4), 340–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., & Fewell, R. R. (1989). Stress and coping among parents of handicapped children: a multidimensional approach. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 94(3), 240–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Garwood, M. M., Bernacki, J. M., Fine, K. M., Hainsworth, K. R., Davies, W. H., & Klein-Tasman, B. P. (2012). Physical, cognitive, and psychosocial predictors of functional disability and health-related quality of life in adolescents with neurofibromatosis-1. Pain Res Treat, 2012.
  20. Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 399–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein, H., Akre, C., Belanger, R. E., & Suris, J. C. (2013). Detached, distraught or discerning? Fathers of adolescents with chronic illness: a review of the literature. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 25(2), 109–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Graf, A., Landolt, M. A., Mori, A. C., & Boltshauser, E. (2006). Quality of life and psychological adjustment in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. The Journal of Pediatrics, 149(3), 348–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Grajales 3rd, F. J., Sheps, S., Ho, K., Novak-Lauscher, H., & Eysenbach, G. (2014). Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), e13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyman, S. L., Shores, A., & North, K. N. (2005). The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology, 65(7), 1037–1044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyman, S. L., Arthur Shores, E., & North, K. N. (2006). Learning disabilities in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: subtypes, cognitive profile, and attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(12), 973–977.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, N. S., Saal, H. M., Lovell, A. M., & Schorry, E. K. (1999). Social and emotional problems in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: evidence and proposed interventions. The Journal of Pediatrics, 134(6), 767–772.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerr, S. M., & McIntosh, J. B. (2000). Coping when a child has a disability: exploring the impact of parent-to-parent support. Child: Care, Health and Development, 26(4), 309–322.Google Scholar
  28. Kingsnorth, S., Gall, C., Beayni, S., & Rigby, P. (2011). Parents as transition experts? Qualitative findings from a pilot parent-led peer support group. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37(6), 833–840.Google Scholar
  29. Laranjo, L., Arguel, A., Neves, A. L., Gallagher, A. M., Kaplan, R., Mortimer, N., & Lau, A. Y. (2015). The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 243–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Law, M., King, S., Stewart, D., & King, G. (2001). The perceived effects of parent-led support groups for parents of children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 21(2–3), 29–48.Google Scholar
  31. Levine, T. M., Materek, A., Abel, J., O’Donnell, M., & Cutting, L. E. (2006). Cognitive profile of neurofibromatosis type 1. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 13(1), 8–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, S., Gillespie, A., Wolters, P. L., & Widemann, B. C. (2011). Experiences of families with a child, adolescent, or young adult with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibroma evaluated for clinical trials participation at the National Cancer Institute. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32(1), 10–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin, S., Wolters, P., Baldwin, A., Gillespie, A., Dombi, E., Walker, K., & Widemann, B. (2012). Social-emotional functioning of children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: relationships with cognitive, disease, and environmental variables. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37(7), 713–724.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, S., Wolters, P. L., Baldwin, A., Roderick, M. C., Toledo-Tamula, M. A., Gillespie, A., & Widemann, B. (2014). Attitudes about internet support groups among adolescents and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 and their parents. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(5), 796–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, S., Roderick, M. C., Lockridge, R., Toledo-Tamula, M. A., Baldwin, A., Knight, P., & Wolters, P. (2017). Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an internet support group for parents of a child with neurofibromatosis type 1: a pilot study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(3), 576–585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McKinney, B., & Peterson, R. A. (1987). Predictors of stress in parents of developmentally disabled children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12(1), 133–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McLaughlin, M., Nam, Y., Gould, J., Pade, C., Meeske, K. A., Ruccione, K. S., & Fulk, J. (2012). A videosharing social networking intervention for young adult cancer survivors. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oris, L., Seiffge-Krenke, I., Moons, P., Goubert, L., Rassart, J., Goossens, E., & Luyckx, K. (2016). Parental and peer support in adolescents with a chronic condition: a typological approach and developmental implications. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 39(1), 107–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pardeck, J. A., & Pardeck, J. T. (1990). Family factors related to adolescent autonomy. Adolescence, 25(98), 311–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Patashnick, J., & Rich, M. (2005). Researching human experience: video intervention/prevention assessment (VIA). Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 36(1), 71 e79-71.e13.Google Scholar
  42. Patterson, J., & Blum, R. W. (1996). Risk and resilience among children and youth with disabilities. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 150(7), 692–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qiu, L., Lin, H., Leung, A. K., & Tov, W. (2012). Putting their best foot forward: emotional disclosure on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(10), 569–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Reiter-Purtill, J., Schorry, E. K., Lovell, A. M., Vannatta, K., Gerhardt, C. A., & Noll, R. B. (2008). Parental distress, family functioning, and social support in families with and without a child with neurofibromatosis 1. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(4), 422–434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rich, M., & Patashnick, J. (2002). Narrative research with audiovisual data: video intervention/prevention assessment (VIA) and NVivo. International Journal of Social Research and Methodology, 5(3), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rich, M., Lamola, S., Amory, C., & Schneider, L. (2000a). Asthma in life context: video intervention/prevention assessment (VIA). Pediatrics, 105(3 Pt 1), 469–477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rich, M., Lamola, S., Gordon, J., & Chalfen, R. (2000b). Video intervention/prevention assessment: a patient-centered methodology for understanding the adolescent illness experience. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(3), 155–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rich, M., Huecker, D., & Ludwig, D. (2001). Obesity in the lives of children and adolescents: inquiry through patient-centered visual narratives. Pediatric Research, 49, 7A.Google Scholar
  49. Rich, M., Patashnick, J., Huecker, D., & Ludwig, D. (2002). Living with obesity: visual narratives of overweight adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rich, M., Lamola, S., & Woods, E. R. (2006). Effects of creating visual illness narratives on quality of life with asthma: a pilot intervention study. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(6), 748–752.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ritterband, L. M., & Palermo, T. M. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: eHealth in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(5), 453–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shilling, V., Morris, C., Thompson-Coon, J., Ukoumunne, O., Rogers, M., & Logan, S. (2013). Peer support for parents of children with chronic disabling conditions: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 55(7), 602–609.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Solomon, M., Pistrang, N., & Barker, C. (2001). The benefits of mutual support groups for parents of children with disabilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 113–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sullivan-Bolyai, S., & Lee, M. M. (2011). Parent mentor perspectives on providing social support to empower parents. The Diabetes Educator, 37(1), 35–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tonsgard, J. H. (2006). Clinical manifestations and management of neurofibromatosis type 1. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 13(1), 2–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Trujillo, E., Suarez, D., Lema, M., & Londono, A. (2015). How adolescents learn about risk perception and behavior in regards to alcohol use in light of social learning theory: a qualitative study in Bogota, Colombia. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 27(1), 3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T, 39(7), 491–520.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Akre
    • 1
  • Julie Polvinen
    • 2
  • Nicole J. Ullrich
    • 3
  • Michael Rich
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP)Lausanne University HospitalLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Center on Media and Child HealthBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyBoston Children’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations