Abstract
The aim of this study was to obtain patient and parent perspectives on genetic evaluation of hearing loss, in order to identify motivators, expectations, and barriers. Three focus groups were conducted following a semi-structured discussion guide, led by an independent moderator. Participants were hearing parents of children with permanent hearing loss or deaf adults. Qualitative content analysis was used to develop a codebook and identify major themes and subthemes. Participant views were compared to national guidelines. The 28 participants comprised 23 parents representing 21 unique families and 5 deaf adults. 13/21 families and 0/5 adults reported comorbidities, 4/21 families and 3/5 adults had a positive family history, and 12/21 families versus 0/5 adults had utilized genetics services. A common theme among adults and parents was a curiosity as to the cause of hearing loss. Parents were motivated to detect comorbidities and optimize care for hearing loss. Some parents felt overwhelmed by the hearing loss and unprepared to pursue early genetic evaluation as recommended in guidelines. Several reported positive experiences following genetics consultation, while others reported unease and unmet expectations. Notably, both parents and adults expressed ambivalence regarding the desire for genetic knowledge. Financial concerns and difficulties obtaining a referral were cited as extrinsic barriers. For parents of children with hearing loss, both the presence of comorbidities and a positive family history were drivers of genetics consultation and/or genetic testing. We identified educational opportunities for both patients and providers that would improve informed decision-making and increase access to genetic services. Consideration of the patient/family perspective and their decision-making processes, along with flexibility in the approach to genetics evaluation and its timing, will optimize both the development and implementation of guidelines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACMG. (2000). American College of Medical Genetics. Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics on universal newborn hearing screening. Genetics in Medicine, 2, 149–150.
Alford, R. L., Arnos, K. S., Fox, M., Lin, J. W., Palmer, C. G., Pandya, A., Rehm, H. L., Robin, N. H., Scott, D. A., & Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (2014). American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss. Genetics in Medicine, 16(4), 347–355.
Biesecker, B. B., & Erby, L. (2008). Adaptation to living with a genetic condition or risk: A mini-review. Clinical Genetics, 74(5), 401–407.
Boudreault, P., Baldwin, E. E., Fox, M., Dutton, L., Tullis, L. E., Linden, J., Kobayashi, Y., Zhou, J., Sinsheimer, J. S., Sininger, Y., Grody, W. W., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2010). Deaf adults reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: Results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 209–227.
Brunger, J. W., Murray, G. S., O'Riordan, M., Matthews, A. L., Smith, R. J., & Robin, N. H. (2000). Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(6), 1621–1625.
Burton, S. K., Withrow, K., Arnos, K. S., Kalfoglou, A. L., & Pandya, A. (2006). A focus group study of consumer attitudes toward genetic testing and newborn screening for deafness. Genetics in Medicine, 8(12), 779–783.
Cohen, J. S., & Biesecker, B. B. (2010). Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 152a(5), 1136–1156.
Dagan, O., Hochner, H., Levi, H., Raas-Rothschild, A., & Sagi, M. (2002). Genetic testing for hearing loss: Different motivations for the same outcome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 113(2), 137–143.
Duncan, R. D., Prucka, S., Wiatrak, B. J., Smith, R. J., & Robin, N. H. (2007). Pediatric otolaryngologists' use of genetic testing. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 133(3), 231–236.
Fisher, H. R., McKevitt, C., & Boaz, A. (2011). Why do parents enroll their children in research: A narrative synthesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 544–551.
Genetics in Primary Care Institute Website (2015). geneticsinprimarycare.aap.org. Web. 1 Oct. 2015, from geneticsinprimarycare.aap.org.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2006). Attitudes to genetic testing for deafness: The importance of informed choice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(1), 51–59.
Hammers, E. (Ed.). (2009). Innovations in service delivery in the age of genomics workshop summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Kaimal, G., Steinberg, A. G., Ennis, S., Harasink, S. M., Ewing, R., & Li, Y. (2007). Parental narratives about genetic testing for hearing loss: A one year follow up study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 775–787.
Kaye, C. I. (2012). Genetic service delivery: Infrastructure, assessment and information. Public Health Genomics, 15(3–4), 164–171.
Kemper, A. R., & Downs, S. M. (2000). A cost-effectiveness analysis of newborn hearing screening strategies. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154(5), 484–488.
Kiedrowski, L.A., Owens, K.M., Yashar, B.M., Schuette, J.L. (2016). Parents' perspectives on variants of uncertain significance from chromosome microarray analysis. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(1), 101–111.
Martinez, A., Linden, J., Schimmenti, L. A., & Palmer, C. G. (2003). Attitudes of the broader hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing community toward genetic testing for deafness. Genetics in Medicine, 5(2), 106–112.
McAllister, M., Davies, L., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & MacLeod, R. (2007). The emotional effects of genetic diseases: Implications for clinical genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 143(22), 2651–2661.
Michigan Hands & Voices Website (2010). http://www.mihandsandvoices.org/contact.html . 2016. http://www.mihandsandvoices.org/contact.html.
Middleton, A., Hewison, J., & Mueller, R. F. (1998). Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63(4), 1175–1180.
Middleton, A., Hewison, J., & Mueller, R. (2001). Prenatal diagnosis for inherited deafness--what is the potential demand? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(2), 121–131.
Middleton, A., Emery, S. D., & Turner, G. H. (2010). Views, knowledge, and beliefs and genetics and genetic counselling among deaf people. Sign Language Studies, 10, 170–196.
Morton, N. E. (1991). Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 630, 16–31.
Morzaria, S., Westerberg, B. D., & Kozak, F. K. (2005). Evidence-based algorithm for the evaluation of a child with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 34(5), 297–303.
Mulley, A. G., Trimble, C., & Elwyn, G. (2012). Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ, 345, e6572.
OMIM (2016). Online Medelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM is a comprehensive authoritative compendium of human genes and genetic phenotypes that is freely available and updated daily. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
Palmer, C. G., Martinez, A., Fox, M., Sininger, Y., Grody, W. W., & Schimmenti, L. A. (2008). Ethnic differences in parental perceptions of genetic testing for deaf infants. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(1), 129–138.
Palmer, C. G., Lueddeke, J. T., & Zhou, J. (2009). Factors influencing parental decision about genetics evaluation for their deaf or hard-of-hearing child. Genetics in Medicine, 11(4), 248–255.
Ross, L. F., Saal, H. M., David, K. L., & Anderson, R. R. (2013). Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 234–245.
Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Shearer, A.E., DeLuca, A.P., Hildebrand, M.S., Taylor, K.R., Gurrola, J., Scherer, S., Scheetz, T.E., Smith, R.J.H. (2010). Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(49), 21104–21109.
Steinberg, A. G., Kaimal, G., Bain, L., Krantz, I., & Li, Y. (2007). Parental narratives on genetic testing for children with hearing loss: A qualitative inquiry. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 143a(14), 1533–1545.
Stern, S. J., Arnos, K. S., Murrelle, L., Welch, K. O., Nance, W. E., & Pandya, A. (2002). Attitudes of deaf and hard of hearing subjects towards genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis of hearing loss. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39(6), 449–453.
Taneja, P. R., Pandya, A., Foley, D. L., Nicely, L. V., & Arnos, K. S. (2004). Attitudes of deaf individuals towards genetic testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 130a(1), 17–21.
Van Camp G, Smith RJH. (2016). Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage.URL: http://hereditaryhearingloss.org accessed 2016
Whelan, A. J., Ball, S., Best, L., Best, R. G., Echiverri, S. C., Ganschow, P., et al. (2004). Genetic red flags: Clues to thinking genetically in primary care practice. Primary Care; Clinics in Office Practice, 31(3), 497–508.
White, K. R. (2003). The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9(2), 79–88.
Withrow, K. A., Burton, S., Arnos, K. S., Kalfoglou, A., & Pandya, A. (2008). Consumer motivations for pursuing genetic testing and their preferences for the provision of genetic services for hearing loss. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(3), 252–260.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (2003). Early intervention after universal neonatal hearing screening: Impact on outcomes. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9(4), 252–266.
Yoshinaga-Itano C, Abdala de Uzcategui C. (2001). Early identification and social-emotional factors of children with hearing loss and children screened for hearing loss. In: Kurtzer-White E, Luterman D, eds: Early Childhood Deafness. Baltimore, MD: York Press: 13–28.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A. L., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998). Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics, 102(5), 1161–1171.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the families for their participation. This research was supported by a grant to MML from the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. We thank David Baker of Baker Strategy Group for assistance with recruiting and running the focus groups, and Transcription America for assistance with transcription. This study was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Master of Science, University of Michigan Genetic Counseling Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Funding
Supported by funding from the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology and the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Marci M. Lesperance, Erin Winkler, Tori L. Melendez and Beverly M. Yashar declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Animal Studies
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lesperance, M.M., Winkler, E., Melendez, T.L. et al. “My Plate is Full”: Reasons for Declining a Genetic Evaluation of Hearing Loss. J Genet Counsel 27, 597–607 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0149-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0149-9