Communication Between Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Inconclusive Genetic Test Results and Their Daughters and Sisters Years After Testing
- 441 Downloads
Inconclusive genetic test results including screening recommendations for the breast cancer patients and their first-degree relatives are the most common outcomes of BRCA 1/2 testing. Patients themselves should communicate these results to their relatives. Our aim was to explore communication of breast cancer genetic counseling results with daughters and sisters over a long period of time. Breast cancer patients, who had received an inconclusive DNA test result 7–14 years earlier, completed a self-report questionnaire. Additionally, in-depth interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. Of the 93 respondents, 85 (91 %) considered themselves responsible for communicating genetic test results to relatives. In-depth interviews (n = 14) showed, that counselees wanted ‘to hand over’ their responsibilities to communicate the test results and screening recommendations to their sisters. Although most patients had informed their daughters and sisters about the genetic test results, usually little is spoken about genetic test results and screening recommendations once the duty of informing is completed. We recommend that, similar to the procedure for BRCA1/2-mutation carriers, a separate letter for first-degree relatives of patients with an inconclusive test result should be provided. In this way information about risks and screening recommendations can be verified by family members years after genetic testing has been completed.
KeywordsGenetic testing Genetic counseling Breast cancer Communication Family Long term Inconclusive test result
This study was funded by the Dutch Pink Ribbon Foundation (grant number 2010.WO14.C60).
Conflict of Interest
Jessica E. Baars, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Els van Riel, Marijke C. Kars, Eveline M. A. Bleiker declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article
- Bleiker, E. M., Menko, F. H., Kluijt, I., Taal, B. G., Gerritsma, M. A., Wever, L. D., et al. (2007). Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 5, 59–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Boeije, H. R. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. J. Guerin Jr. (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 42–90). New York: Garner Press.Google Scholar
- Bradbury, A. R., Dignam, J. J., Ibe, C. N., Auh, S. L., Hlubocky, F. J., Cummings, S. A., et al. (2007). How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family’s risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 3705–3711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chivers, S. K., Addington-Hall, J., Lucassen, A. M., & Foster, C. L. (2010). What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Domchek, S. M., Friebel, T. M., Singer, C. F., Evans, D. G., Lynch, H. T., Isaacs, C., et al. (2010). Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304, 967–975.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- FH01 management committee. (2006). The challenge of evaluating annual mammography screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of Medical Screening, 13, 177–182.Google Scholar
- Royal College of Physicians (2011). Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic information 2nd edn. Report of the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics. RCP, London.Google Scholar
- Schlich-Bakker, K. J., Warlam-Rodenhuis, C. C., van Echtelt, J., van den Bout, J., Ausems, M. G., & ten Kroode, H. F. (2006). Short term psychological distress in patients actively approached for genetic counselling after diagnosis of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 42, 2722–2728.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar