Abstract
Next generation genomic sequencing technologies (including whole genome or whole exome sequencing) are being increasingly applied to clinical care. Yet, the breadth and complexity of sequencing information raise questions about how best to communicate and return sequencing information to patients and families in ways that facilitate comprehension and optimal health decisions. Obtaining answers to such questions will require multidisciplinary research. In this paper, we focus on how psychological science research can address questions related to clinical genomic sequencing by explaining emotional, cognitive, and behavioral processes in response to different types of genomic sequencing information (e.g., diagnostic results and incidental findings). We highlight examples of psychological science that can be applied to genetic counseling research to inform the following questions: (1) What factors influence patients’ and providers’ informational needs for developing an accurate understanding of what genomic sequencing results do and do not mean?; (2) How and by whom should genomic sequencing results be communicated to patients and their family members?; and (3) How do patients and their families respond to uncertainties related to genomic information?
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antheunis, M. L., Tates, K., & Nieboer, T. E. (2013). Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers, and expectations. Patient Education and Counseling, 92, 426–431.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior, 31, 143–164.
Barrett Feldman, L., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., Gross, J. J. The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403.
Baum, A., Friedman, A. L., & Zakowski, S. G. (1997). Stress and genetic testing for disease risk. Health Psychology, 16, 8–19.
Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 920–954.
Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011). Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 499–504.
Bernhardt, B. (2014). Genetic counselors and the future of clinical genomics. Genome Medicine, 6, 48–51.
Bick, D., & Dimmock, D. (2011). Whole exome and whole genome sequencing. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 23, 594–600.
Biesecker, L. G., Burke, W., Kohane, I., Plon, S. E., & Zimmern, R. (2012). Next generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready? Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 818–824.
Biesecker, B. B., Klein, W., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Wright, M. F., Biesecker, L. G. et al. (2014). Brief report: how do research participants perceive “uncertainty” in genome sequencing? Genetics in Medicine. Accessed June 15, 2014 from http://www.nature.com/gim/journal/vaop/ncurrent/index.html#29052014.
Burke, W., Matheny Antommaria, A. H., Bennett, R., Botkin, J., Wright Clayton, E., Henderson, G. E., et al. (2013). Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genetics in Medicine, 15, 854–859.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., Johnson, J. D., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: the relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of Medical Library Association, 93, 353–362.
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.
Cheng, C., Cheung, S., Chio, J. H., & Chan, M. S. (2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: a meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychology Bulletin, 139, 152–188.
Cho, M. K. (2008). Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. Journal of Law and Medical Ethics, 36, 280–285.
Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Habashi, M. M., & Evans, A. T. (2012). Source expertise and persuasion: the effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 38, 90–100.
Condit, C. M. (2010). Public understandings of genetics and health. Clinical Genetics, 77, 1–9.
Dancyger, C., Smith, J. A., Jacobs, C., Wallace, M., & Michie, S. (2010). Comparing family members’ motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18, 1289–1295.
Enkin, M. W., & Jadad, A. R. (1998). Using anecdotal information in evidence-based health care: heresy or necessity? Annals of Oncology, 9, 963–966.
Facio, F. M., Brooks, S., Loewenstein, J., Green, S., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2011). Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 1213–1217.
Facio, F. M., Lee, K., & O’Daniel, J. M. (2014). A genetic counselor’s guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 455–462.
Feero, W. G., & Green, E. D. (2011). Genomics education for health care professionals in the 21st century. JAMA, 306, 989–990.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101–106.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 565–574.
Haga, S. B., Burke, W., Ginsburg, G. S., Mills, R., & Agans, R. (2012). Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 82, 388–394.
Haga, S.B., Mills, R., & Bosworth, H. (2014). Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: Promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response. Patient Education Counseling, 14. Accessed 8/19/14 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399114002390#.
Halpern, J., & Arnold, R. M. (2008). Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 1708–1712.
Hamilton, J. G., Hutson, S. P., Moser, R. P., Kobrin, S. C., Frohnmayer, A. E., Alter, B. P., et al. (2013). Sources of uncertainty and their association with medical decision making: exploring mechanisms in Fanconi anemia. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 204–216.
Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Arora, N. K. (2011). Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy. Medical Decision Making, 31, 828–838.
Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2009). Chapter 3 action-based model of dissonance: a review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 119–166.
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–888.
Hawkins, R. P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., & Dijkstra, A. (2008). Understanding tailoring in communication about health. Health Education Research, 23, 454–466.
Hernandez, I., & Preston, J. L. (2013). Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 178–182.
Higgins, T. E., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425.
Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 777–792.
Hooker, G. W., Ormond, K. E., Sweet, K., & Biesecker, B. B. (2014). Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 445–451.
Johnson Wright, J., Afari, N., & Zautra, A. (2009). The illness uncertainty concept: a review. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 13, 133–138.
Johnson, J. D., Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Genomics—the perfect information-seeking research problem. Journal of Health Communications: International Perspectives, 10, 323–329.
Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799–825.
Jonas, E., Traut-Mattausch, E., Frey, D., & Greenberg, J. (2008). The path or the goal? Decision vs. information focus in biased information seeking after preliminary decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1180–1186.
King, L. A. (2008). The science of psychology: An appreciative view. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Krebs, P., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (2010). A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive Medicine, 51, 214–221.
Kreuter, M. W., & McClure, S. M. (2004). The role of culture in health communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 439–455.
Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., et al. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221–235.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Paulsen, C., & White, S. (2006). The health literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Accessed May 29, 2013 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483_1.pdf.
Landsbergen, K., Verhaak, C., Floor, K., & Hoogerbrugge, N. (2005). Genetic update in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients. Familial Cancer, 4, 115–119.
Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491–513.
Lea, D. H., Kaphingst, K. A., Bowen, D., Lipkus, I., & Hadley, D. W. (2011). Communicating genetic and genomic information: Health literacy and numeracy considerations. Public Health Genomics, 14, 279–289.
Lepore, S. J., & Revenson, T. A. (2007). Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 313–333.
Leung, K. K., Silvius, J. L., Pimlott, N., Dalziel, W., & Drummond, N. (2009). Why health expectations and hopes are different: the development of a conceptual model. Health Expectations, 12, 347–360.
Lewis, C. L., Wickstrom, G. C., Kolar, M. M., Keyserling, T. C., Bognar, B. A., DuPre, C. T., et al. (2000). Patient preferences for care by general internists and specialists in the ambulatory setting. Journal of General Internal Medincine, 15, 75–83.
Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., & Friedman, J. M. (2014). Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–11.
Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
Marteau, T. M., & Weinman, J. (2006). Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Social Science Medicine, 62, 1360–1368.
McBride, C. M., Koehly, L. M., Sanderson, S. C., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2010). The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 89–103.
McCaffery, K. J., Holmes-Rovner, M., Smith, S. K., Rovner, D., Nutbeam, D., Clayman, M. L. et al. (2013). Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med informatics and Dec Making. Accessed February 27, 2014 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6949/13/S2/S10.
McClellan, K. A., Kleiderman, E., Black, L., Bouchard, K., Doval, M., Simard, J., et al. (2013). Exploring resources for intrafamilial communication of cancer risk: We still need to talk. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21, 903–910.
McDowell, M. E., Occhipinti, S., & Chambers, S. K. (2013). The influence of family history on cognitive heuristics, risk perceptions, and prostate cancer screening behavior. Health Psychology, 32, 1158–1169.
McGuire, A. L., Fisher, R., Cusenza, P., Hudson, K., Rothstein, M. A., McGraw, D., et al. (2008). Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic healthrecords: points to consider. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 495–499.
Mickelson, K. D., Lyons, R. F., Sullivan, M. J. L., & Coyne, J. C. (2001). Yours, mine, ours: The relational context of communal coping. In B. Sarason & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Implications for clinical and community psychology (pp. 181–200). Chichester: Wiley.
Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 345–353.
Miller, F. A., Hayeems, R. Z., Bytautas, J. P., Bedard, P. L., Ernst, S., Hirte, H., et al. (2014). Testing personalized medicine: Patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer. European Journal of Human Genetics, 22, 391–395.
Mills, R., & Haga, S. B. (2013). Genomic counseling: next generation counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–4.
Mishel, M. H. (1990). Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22, 256–262.
Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Narrative versus nonnarrative: the role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. Journal of Communication, 63, 116–137.
Neville, K. L. (2003). Uncertainty in illness: an integrative review. Orthopaedic Nursing, 22, 206–214.
Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 673–693.
Olsen, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.
Ormond, K. E. (2013). From genetic counseling to “genomic counseling. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 1(4), 189–193.
Patenaude, A. F., Guttmacher, A. E., & Collins, F. S. (2002). Genetic testing and psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 271–282.
Peters, E., Lipkus, I., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, S140–S162.
Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Koehly, L. M., Groubard, B., Loud, J. T., et al. (2011). Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian (HBOC) susceptibility families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20, 450–464.
Peterson, S. (2005). The role of the family in genetic testing: Theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 627–639.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York: Guilford Press.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues: Privacy and progress in whole genome sequencing (October 2012). Accessed December 19, 2013 from http://bioethics.gov/node/764.
Prince, A. R. & Roche, M. I. (2014). Genetic information, non-discrimination, and privacy protections in genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Accessed November 13, 2014 from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10897-014-9743-2/fulltext.html.
Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28, 850–865.
Rhodes, R., & Strain, J. J. (2008). Affective forecasting and its implications for medical ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17, 54–65.
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychology Bulletin, 121, 3–19.
Sapp, J. C., Dong, D., Stark, C., Ivey, L. E., Hooker, G., Biesecker, L. G., et al. (2014). Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children. Clinical Genetics, 85, 120–126.
Schmidlen, T. J., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., García-España, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 578–587.
Senay, I., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2009). Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk. Medical Decision Making, 29, 193–201.
Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & MacGregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24, S35–S40.
Stanek, E. J., Sanders, C. L., Johansen Taber, K. A., Patel, A., Verbrugge, R. R., Agatep, B. C., et al. (2012). Adoption of pharmacogenomics testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 9, 450–458.
Sweeny, K., & Cavanaugh, A. G. (2012). Waiting is the hardest part: a model of uncertainty navigation in the context of health news. Health Psychology Review, 6, 147–164.
Tercyak, K. P., O’Neill, S. C., Roter, D. L., & McBride, C. M. (2012). Bridging the communication divide: a role for health psychology in the genomic era. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 568–575.
Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H. (2013). Correlates of health-related social media use among adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e21. Accessed October 21, 2014 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/pmc/articles/PMC3636287/?report=classic.
Timmermans, L. M., van Zuuren, F. J., van der Maazen, R. W. M., Leer, J. W. H., & Kraaimaat, F. W. (2007). Monitoring and blunting in palliative and curative radiotherapy consultations. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 1111–1120.
Trevena, L. J., Zimund-Fisher, B. J., Edwards, A., Gaissmaier, W., Galesic, M., Han, P. K. J. et al. (2013). Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med informatics and Dec Making. Accessed March 7, 2014 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/13/S2/S7.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Vos, J., Gómez-García, E., Oosterwijk, J. C., Menko, F. H., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012). Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselee’s perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA 1/2 result. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 29–42.
Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 585–594.
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.
Winter, L., Moss, M. S., & Hoffman, C. (2009). Affective forecasting and advance care planning: anticipating quality of life in future health statuses. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 447–456.
Conflict of Interest
All of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, C.M., Rini, C., Bernhardt, B.A. et al. How Can Psychological Science Inform Research About Genetic Counseling for Clinical Genomic Sequencing?. J Genet Counsel 24, 193–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9804-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9804-6