Skip to main content

How Can Psychological Science Inform Research About Genetic Counseling for Clinical Genomic Sequencing?

An Erratum to this article was published on 25 December 2014

Abstract

Next generation genomic sequencing technologies (including whole genome or whole exome sequencing) are being increasingly applied to clinical care. Yet, the breadth and complexity of sequencing information raise questions about how best to communicate and return sequencing information to patients and families in ways that facilitate comprehension and optimal health decisions. Obtaining answers to such questions will require multidisciplinary research. In this paper, we focus on how psychological science research can address questions related to clinical genomic sequencing by explaining emotional, cognitive, and behavioral processes in response to different types of genomic sequencing information (e.g., diagnostic results and incidental findings). We highlight examples of psychological science that can be applied to genetic counseling research to inform the following questions: (1) What factors influence patients’ and providers’ informational needs for developing an accurate understanding of what genomic sequencing results do and do not mean?; (2) How and by whom should genomic sequencing results be communicated to patients and their family members?; and (3) How do patients and their families respond to uncertainties related to genomic information?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Antheunis, M. L., Tates, K., & Nieboer, T. E. (2013). Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers, and expectations. Patient Education and Counseling, 92, 426–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior, 31, 143–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett Feldman, L., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., Gross, J. J. The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403.

  • Baum, A., Friedman, A. L., & Zakowski, S. G. (1997). Stress and genetic testing for disease risk. Health Psychology, 16, 8–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 920–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011). Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 499–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, B. (2014). Genetic counselors and the future of clinical genomics. Genome Medicine, 6, 48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bick, D., & Dimmock, D. (2011). Whole exome and whole genome sequencing. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 23, 594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biesecker, L. G., Burke, W., Kohane, I., Plon, S. E., & Zimmern, R. (2012). Next generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready? Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 818–824.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biesecker, B. B., Klein, W., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Wright, M. F., Biesecker, L. G. et al. (2014). Brief report: how do research participants perceive “uncertainty” in genome sequencing? Genetics in Medicine. Accessed June 15, 2014 from http://www.nature.com/gim/journal/vaop/ncurrent/index.html#29052014.

  • Burke, W., Matheny Antommaria, A. H., Bennett, R., Botkin, J., Wright Clayton, E., Henderson, G. E., et al. (2013). Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genetics in Medicine, 15, 854–859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., Johnson, J. D., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: the relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of Medical Library Association, 93, 353–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Cheung, S., Chio, J. H., & Chan, M. S. (2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: a meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychology Bulletin, 139, 152–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. K. (2008). Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. Journal of Law and Medical Ethics, 36, 280–285.

  • Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Habashi, M. M., & Evans, A. T. (2012). Source expertise and persuasion: the effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 38, 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condit, C. M. (2010). Public understandings of genetics and health. Clinical Genetics, 77, 1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dancyger, C., Smith, J. A., Jacobs, C., Wallace, M., & Michie, S. (2010). Comparing family members’ motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18, 1289–1295.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enkin, M. W., & Jadad, A. R. (1998). Using anecdotal information in evidence-based health care: heresy or necessity? Annals of Oncology, 9, 963–966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Facio, F. M., Brooks, S., Loewenstein, J., Green, S., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2011). Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 1213–1217.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Facio, F. M., Lee, K., & O’Daniel, J. M. (2014). A genetic counselor’s guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 455–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feero, W. G., & Green, E. D. (2011). Genomics education for health care professionals in the 21st century. JAMA, 306, 989–990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 565–574.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haga, S. B., Burke, W., Ginsburg, G. S., Mills, R., & Agans, R. (2012). Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 82, 388–394.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haga, S.B., Mills, R., & Bosworth, H. (2014). Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: Promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response. Patient Education Counseling, 14. Accessed 8/19/14 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399114002390#.

  • Halpern, J., & Arnold, R. M. (2008). Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 1708–1712.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. G., Hutson, S. P., Moser, R. P., Kobrin, S. C., Frohnmayer, A. E., Alter, B. P., et al. (2013). Sources of uncertainty and their association with medical decision making: exploring mechanisms in Fanconi anemia. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 204–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Arora, N. K. (2011). Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy. Medical Decision Making, 31, 828–838.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2009). Chapter 3 action-based model of dissonance: a review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 119–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., & Dijkstra, A. (2008). Understanding tailoring in communication about health. Health Education Research, 23, 454–466.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, I., & Preston, J. L. (2013). Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 178–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, T. E., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, G. W., Ormond, K. E., Sweet, K., & Biesecker, B. B. (2014). Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 445–451.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Wright, J., Afari, N., & Zautra, A. (2009). The illness uncertainty concept: a review. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 13, 133–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. D., Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Genomics—the perfect information-seeking research problem. Journal of Health Communications: International Perspectives, 10, 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, E., Traut-Mattausch, E., Frey, D., & Greenberg, J. (2008). The path or the goal? Decision vs. information focus in biased information seeking after preliminary decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1180–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A. (2008). The science of psychology: An appreciative view. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, P., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (2010). A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive Medicine, 51, 214–221.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, M. W., & McClure, S. M. (2004). The role of culture in health communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 439–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., et al. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Paulsen, C., & White, S. (2006). The health literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Accessed May 29, 2013 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483_1.pdf.

  • Landsbergen, K., Verhaak, C., Floor, K., & Hoogerbrugge, N. (2005). Genetic update in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients. Familial Cancer, 4, 115–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D. H., Kaphingst, K. A., Bowen, D., Lipkus, I., & Hadley, D. W. (2011). Communicating genetic and genomic information: Health literacy and numeracy considerations. Public Health Genomics, 14, 279–289.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, S. J., & Revenson, T. A. (2007). Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. K., Silvius, J. L., Pimlott, N., Dalziel, W., & Drummond, N. (2009). Why health expectations and hopes are different: the development of a conceptual model. Health Expectations, 12, 347–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. L., Wickstrom, G. C., Kolar, M. M., Keyserling, T. C., Bognar, B. A., DuPre, C. T., et al. (2000). Patient preferences for care by general internists and specialists in the ambulatory setting. Journal of General Internal Medincine, 15, 75–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., & Friedman, J. M. (2014). Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–11.

  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau, T. M., & Weinman, J. (2006). Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Social Science Medicine, 62, 1360–1368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, C. M., Koehly, L. M., Sanderson, S. C., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2010). The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 89–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, K. J., Holmes-Rovner, M., Smith, S. K., Rovner, D., Nutbeam, D., Clayman, M. L. et al. (2013). Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med informatics and Dec Making. Accessed February 27, 2014 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6949/13/S2/S10.

  • McClellan, K. A., Kleiderman, E., Black, L., Bouchard, K., Doval, M., Simard, J., et al. (2013). Exploring resources for intrafamilial communication of cancer risk: We still need to talk. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21, 903–910.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, M. E., Occhipinti, S., & Chambers, S. K. (2013). The influence of family history on cognitive heuristics, risk perceptions, and prostate cancer screening behavior. Health Psychology, 32, 1158–1169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, A. L., Fisher, R., Cusenza, P., Hudson, K., Rothstein, M. A., McGraw, D., et al. (2008). Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic healthrecords: points to consider. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 495–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, K. D., Lyons, R. F., Sullivan, M. J. L., & Coyne, J. C. (2001). Yours, mine, ours: The relational context of communal coping. In B. Sarason & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Implications for clinical and community psychology (pp. 181–200). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 345–353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. A., Hayeems, R. Z., Bytautas, J. P., Bedard, P. L., Ernst, S., Hirte, H., et al. (2014). Testing personalized medicine: Patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer. European Journal of Human Genetics, 22, 391–395.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R., & Haga, S. B. (2013). Genomic counseling: next generation counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–4.

  • Mishel, M. H. (1990). Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22, 256–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Narrative versus nonnarrative: the role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. Journal of Communication, 63, 116–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, K. L. (2003). Uncertainty in illness: an integrative review. Orthopaedic Nursing, 22, 206–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 673–693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormond, K. E. (2013). From genetic counseling to “genomic counseling. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 1(4), 189–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patenaude, A. F., Guttmacher, A. E., & Collins, F. S. (2002). Genetic testing and psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 271–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E., Lipkus, I., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, S140–S162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Koehly, L. M., Groubard, B., Loud, J. T., et al. (2011). Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian (HBOC) susceptibility families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20, 450–464.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. (2005). The role of the family in genetic testing: Theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues: Privacy and progress in whole genome sequencing (October 2012). Accessed December 19, 2013 from http://bioethics.gov/node/764.

  • Prince, A. R. & Roche, M. I. (2014). Genetic information, non-discrimination, and privacy protections in genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling. Accessed November 13, 2014 from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10897-014-9743-2/fulltext.html.

  • Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28, 850–865.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R., & Strain, J. J. (2008). Affective forecasting and its implications for medical ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17, 54–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychology Bulletin, 121, 3–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, J. C., Dong, D., Stark, C., Ivey, L. E., Hooker, G., Biesecker, L. G., et al. (2014). Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children. Clinical Genetics, 85, 120–126.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlen, T. J., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., García-España, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 578–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senay, I., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2009). Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk. Medical Decision Making, 29, 193–201.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & MacGregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24, S35–S40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanek, E. J., Sanders, C. L., Johansen Taber, K. A., Patel, A., Verbrugge, R. R., Agatep, B. C., et al. (2012). Adoption of pharmacogenomics testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 9, 450–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeny, K., & Cavanaugh, A. G. (2012). Waiting is the hardest part: a model of uncertainty navigation in the context of health news. Health Psychology Review, 6, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tercyak, K. P., O’Neill, S. C., Roter, D. L., & McBride, C. M. (2012). Bridging the communication divide: a role for health psychology in the genomic era. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 568–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H. (2013). Correlates of health-related social media use among adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e21. Accessed October 21, 2014 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/pmc/articles/PMC3636287/?report=classic.

  • Timmermans, L. M., van Zuuren, F. J., van der Maazen, R. W. M., Leer, J. W. H., & Kraaimaat, F. W. (2007). Monitoring and blunting in palliative and curative radiotherapy consultations. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 1111–1120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trevena, L. J., Zimund-Fisher, B. J., Edwards, A., Gaissmaier, W., Galesic, M., Han, P. K. J. et al. (2013). Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med informatics and Dec Making. Accessed March 7, 2014 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/13/S2/S7.

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J., Gómez-García, E., Oosterwijk, J. C., Menko, F. H., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012). Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselee’s perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA 1/2 result. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 29–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, L., Moss, M. S., & Hoffman, C. (2009). Affective forecasting and advance care planning: anticipating quality of life in future health statuses. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 447–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

All of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia M. Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, C.M., Rini, C., Bernhardt, B.A. et al. How Can Psychological Science Inform Research About Genetic Counseling for Clinical Genomic Sequencing?. J Genet Counsel 24, 193–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9804-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9804-6

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Genome sequencing
  • Patient understanding
  • Psychological
  • Psychosocial