Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 336–348 | Cite as

Family Communication in a Population at Risk for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

  • Brittany Batte
  • Jane P. Sheldon
  • Patricia Arscott
  • Darcy J. Huismann
  • Lisa Salberg
  • Sharlene M. Day
  • Beverly M. Yashar
Original Research


Encouraging family communication is an integral component of genetic counseling; therefore, we sought to identify factors impacting communication to family members at risk for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Participants (N = 383) completed an online survey assessing: 1) demographics (gender, genetic test results, HCM family history, and disease severity); 2) illness representations; 3) family functioning and cohesiveness; 4) coping styles; 5) comprehension of HCM autosomal dominant inheritance; and 6) communication of HCM risk information to at-risk relatives. Participants were a national sample of individuals with HCM, recruited through the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Association. Data from 183 participants were analyzed using a logistic regression analysis, with family communication as a dichotomous dependent variable. We found that female gender and higher comprehension of autosomal dominant inheritance were significant predictors of participants’ communication of HCM risk information to all their siblings and children. Our results suggest that utilizing interventions that promote patient comprehension (e.g., a teaching-focused model of genetic counseling) are important and may positively impact family communication within families with HCM.


Family Communication Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Risk Information Gender Genetic Comprehension Genetic Counseling 



This work has been supported by the Jane Engelberg Memorial Fellowship Student Research Award, provided by the Engelberg Foundation to the NSGC, and the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate Student Research Grant.

We thank Laura Klem and Kathy Welch for all their assistance with statistical analyses.

Conflict of Interest

Brittany Batte, Jane P. Sheldon, Patricia Arscott, Darcy J. Huismann, Lisa Salberg, Sharlene M. Day, and Beverly M. Yashar declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.


  1. Aartre, R. D., & Day, S. M. (2011). Psychological issues in genetic testing for inherited cardiovascular diseases. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 4, 81–90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.957365.Google Scholar
  2. Aktan-Collan, K. I., Kaariainen, H. A., Kolttola, E. M., Pylvanainen, K., Jarvinen, H. J., Haukkala, A. H., et al. (2011). Sharing genetic risk with next generation: Mutation-positive parents' communication with their offspring in Lynch syndrome. Familial Cancer, 10(1), 43–50. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9386-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bostwick, J. M., & Sola, C. L. (2007). An updated review of implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, induced anxiety, and quality of life. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 30(4), 677–688. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2007.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Broadbent, E., Petrie, K. J., Main, J., & Weinman, J. (2006). The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(6), 631–637. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bylund, C. L., Galvin, K. M., & Gaff, C. L. (2010). Principles of family communication. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Byland (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: Theory and practice (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Byles, J., Byrne, C., Boyle, M. H., & Offord, D. R. (1988). Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster family assessment device. Family Process, 27(1), 97–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Charron, P., Arad, M., Arbustini, E., Basso, C., Biliska, Z., Elliot, P.,…Tavazzi, L. (2010). Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: A position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. European Heart Journal, 31, 2715–2728. doi: 10.109/eurheart/ehq271Google Scholar
  10. Cheung, E. L., Olson, A. D., Yu, T. M., Han, P. Z., & Beattie, M. S. (2010). Communication of BRCA results and family testing in 1,103 high-risk women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 19(9), 2211–2219. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christiaans, I., Birnie, E., Bonsel, G. J., Wilde, A. A. M., & van Langen, I. M. (2008). Uptake of genetic counseling and predictive DNA testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16, 1201–1207. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: Disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15(3), 231–247. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DiCastro, M., Frydman, M., Friedman, I., Shiri-Sverdlov, R., Papa, M. Z., Goldman, B., et al. (2002). Genetic counseling in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Israel: Psychosocial impact and retention of genetic information. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 111(2), 147–151. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10550.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erblich, J., Brown, K., Kim, Y., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Livingston, B. E., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2005). Development and validation of a breast cancer genetic counseling knowledge questionnaire. Patient Education and Counseling, 56(2), 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ersig, A. L., Hadley, D. W., & Koehly, L. M. (2011). Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. Health Communication, 26(7), 587–594. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.558338.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eunpu, D. L. (2010). Genetic counseling strategies for working with families. In B. S. LeRoy, P. McCarthy Veach, & D. M. Bartels (Eds.), Genetic counseling practice: Advanced concepts and skills (pp. 235–251). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Fehniger, J., Lin, F., Beattle, M. S., Joseph, G., & Kaplan, C. (2013). Family communication of BRAC1/2 results and family uptake of BRAC1/2 testing in a diverse population of BRAC1/2 carriers. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 603–612. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9592-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Forrest, L. E., Burke, J., Bacic, S., & Amor, D. J. (2008). Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families. Genetics in Medicine, 10(3), 167–172. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318164540b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, G. J., van Teijlinger, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: Barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64, 317–326. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00142.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaff, C. L., Clarke, A. J., Atkinson, P., Sivell, S., Elwyn, G., Iredale, R., & Edwards, A. (2007). Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: A systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics, 15, 999–1011. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaff, C., Galvin, K. M., & Bylund, C. L. (2010). Family systems theory and genetic counseling. In C. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics (pp. 243–272). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gaff, C., & Hodgson, J. (2014). A genetic counseling intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited conditions. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9696-5.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gersh, B. J., Maron, B. J., Bonow, R. O., Dearana, J. A., Fifer, M. A., Link, M., et al. (2011). ACCF/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 124, e783–e831. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318223e2bd.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, J. N., Hay, J., Kuniyuki, A., Asgari, M. M., Press, N., & Bowen, D. J. (2010). Using a family systems approach to investigate cancer risk communication within melanoma families. Psycho-Oncology, 19(10), 1102–1111. doi: 10.1002/pon.1667.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgson, J., & Gaff, C. (2013). Enhancing family communication about genetics: Ethical and professional dilemmas. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 16–21. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9514-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodgson, J., Metcalfe, S. A., Aitken, M, Donath, S. M., Gaff, D. L, & Winship, I. M. (2014). Improving family communication after a new genetic diagnosis: A randomized controlled trial of a genetic counselling intervention. BMC Medical Genetics, 15, 33. 10.1186/1471-2350-15-33
  28. Ishii, N., Arai, M., Koyama, Y., Ueno, M., Yamaguchi, T., Kazuma, K., et al. (2011). Factors affecting encouragement of relatives among families with Lynch syndrome to seek medical assessment. Familial Cancer, 10(4), 649–654. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9462-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jensen, M. K., Havndrup, O., Christiansen, M., Andersen, P. S., Diness, B., Axelsson, A., & Bundgaard, H. (2013). Penetrance of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children and adolescents: A 12-year follow-up study of clinical screening and predictive genetic testing. Circulation, 127, 48–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Ersig, A. L., Kuhn, N. R., et al. (2009). Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: Implications for family health communication interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2203–2209. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154096.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K., Vernon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 304–313.Google Scholar
  32. LaFrenière, D., Bouchard, K., Godard, B., Simard, J., & Dorval, M. (2013). Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: A close look at the process. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 323–335. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9559-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leventhal, H., Benyamini, Y., Brownlee, S., Diefenbach, M., Leventhal, E. A., Patrick-Miller, L., et al. (1997). Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In K. J. Petrie & J. A. Weinman (Eds.), Perceptions of health and illness (pp. 19–45). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Lindenmeyer, A., Griffiths, F., & Hodgson, J. (2010). ‘The family is part of the treatment really’: A qualitative exploration of collective health narratives in families. Health, 15, 401–415. doi: 10.1177/136345931084493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Maron, B. J., Maron, M. S., & Semsarian, C. (2012). Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60(8), 705–715.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McGivern, B., Everett, J., Yager, G., Baumiller, R., Hafertepen, A., & Saal, H. (2004). Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Genetics in Medicine, 6(6), 503–509. doi: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000144014.91237.A1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: A critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(5), 434–451. doi: 10.1007/s10897-008-9173-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Michigan Department of Community Health. (2012). Too young to die: Impact of sudden cardiac death of the young in Michigan 1999–2008. Retrieved December 9, 2012 from,1607,7-132-2942_4911_4916_47257-241907--,00.html
  39. Miller, E. M., Wang, Y., & Ware, S. M. (2013). Uptake of cardiac screening and genetic testing among hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 258–267. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9544-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Naghi, J. J., & Siegel, R. J. (2010). Medical management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 11(4), 202–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nycum, G., Avard, D., & Knoppers, B. M. (2009). Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17, 872–880. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Olson, D. H. (1986). Circumplex model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Family Process, 25(3), 337–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Patenaude, A., Dorval, M., DiGianni, L., Schneider, K., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. (2006). Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: Factors predicting who women tell. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 700–706. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ratnayake, P., Wakefield, C. E., Meiser, B., Suthers, G., Price, M. A., Duffy, J., et al. (2011). An exploration of the communication preferences regarding genetic testing in individuals from families with identified breast/ovarian cancer mutations. Familial Cancer, 10(1), 97–105. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9383-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rolland, J. S., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Toward a biopsychosocial model for 21st century genetics. Family Process, 44, 3–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Seymour, K. C., Addington-Hall, J., Lucassen, A. M., & Foster, C. L. (2010). What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(4), 330–342. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shiloh, S. (2006). Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: A theoretical review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(5), 325–337. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9044-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoffel, E. M., Ford, B., Mercado, R. C., Punglia, D., Kohlmann, W., Conrad, P., et al. (2008). Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: Communication with close and distant relatives. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 6(3), 333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.014.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. van den Nieuwenhoff, H. W., Mesters, I., Gielen, C., & de Vries, N. K. (2007). Family communication regarding inherited high cholesterol: Why and how do patients disclose genetic risk? Social Science & Medicine, 65(5), 1025–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van der Roest, W. P., Pennings, J. M., Bakker, M., van den Berg, M. P., & van Tintelen, J. P. (2009). Family letters are an effective way to inform relatives about inherited cardiac disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A(3), 357–363. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Vos, J., Menko, F., Jansen, A. M., van Asperen, C. J., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Tibben, A. (2011). A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: A retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives. Familial Cancer, 10(1), 87–96. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Weins, M. E., Wilson, B. J., Honeywell, C., & Etchegary, H. (2013). A family genetic risk communication framework: Guiding tool development in genetics health services. Journal of Community Genetics, 4, 233–242. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0134-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson, B. J., van Forrest, K., Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: The little that is known. Community Genetics, 7, 15–24. doi: 10.1159/000080300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiseman, M., Dancyger, C., & Michie, S. (2010). Communicating genetic risk information within families: A review. Familial Cancer, 9(4), 691–703. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9380-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brittany Batte
    • 1
    • 6
  • Jane P. Sheldon
    • 2
  • Patricia Arscott
    • 3
  • Darcy J. Huismann
    • 4
  • Lisa Salberg
    • 5
  • Sharlene M. Day
    • 3
  • Beverly M. Yashar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Adult Genetics ClinicUniversity of Colorado HospitalAuroraUSA
  5. 5.Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy AssociationHiberniaUSA
  6. 6.Department of Gynecologic OncologyHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations