Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 48–63 | Cite as

What’s the Harm? Genetic Counselor Perceptions of Adverse Effects of Genetics Service Provision by Non-Genetics Professionals

  • Tracy A. Bensend
  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
  • Kristin B. Niendorf
Original Research

Abstract

Anecdotal accounts suggest some patients have experienced negative outcomes as a result of receiving genetics services from non-genetics providers, but empirical evidence of these incidents and their outcomes is limited. This study examined genetic counselors’ perceptions of the occurrence of such incidents in the state of Minnesota. Twenty-five genetic counselors completed an on-line survey and 20 also participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. The interviewees recalled and described 37 specific incidents they perceived as having negative outcomes for patients and/or their families. Inductive and cross-case analysis revealed common themes including: adverse psychosocial effects, inadequate genetic counseling, genetic testing and screening errors, medical mismanagement, negative shifts in attitudes toward medical providers, and unnecessary use of health care resources. Commonly mentioned strategies for preventing/mitigating negative outcomes included: educational outreach and awareness programs for medical providers and the general public, standardized testing and screening processes, and implementing mechanisms for reporting and addressing adverse events. Additional findings, practice and policy implications, and research recommendations are discussed.

Keywords

Genetic counseling Genetic testing Genetic counselors Non-genetics providers Harm Error Structured interview Minnesota 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was done in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the first author’s Master of Science degree from the University of Minnesota. We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the genetic counselors who completed the online survey and to those who also shared their time and expertise in the interviews. We thank Rebecca Anderson, JD, MS, CGC, for providing feedback during the piloting of the survey and interview and Keith Dunder, Esq. for offering background on legal issues and cases related to genetics services. Dr. Christina Palmer served as Action Editor on the manuscript review process and publication decision.

References

  1. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (2012). Cancer program standards 2012: Ensuring patient-centered care. Retrieved from http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/programstandards2012.pdf
  2. ARUP Laboratories (2011). Value of genetic counselors in the laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.aruplab.com/files/resources/genetics/White-paper-1-value-of-GCs-in-lab.pdf
  3. Baars, M. J. H., Henneman, L., & ten Kate, L. P. (2005). Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genetics in Medicine, 7(9), 605–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brierley, K. L., Campfield, D., Ducaine, W., Dohany, L., Donenberg, T., Shannon, K., et al. (2010). Errors in delivery of cancer genetics services: implications for practice. Connecticut Medicine, 74(7), 413–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brierley, K. L., Blouch, E., Cogswell, W., Homer, J. P., Pencarinha, D., Stanislaw, C. L., et al. (2012). Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: medical, ethical, legal, and financial implications. The Cancer Journal, 18(4), 303–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deftos, L. J. (1998). The evolving duty to disclose the presence of genetic disease to relatives. Academic Medicine, 73(9), 962–968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Douglas, H. A., Hamilton, R. J., & Grubs, R. E. (2009). The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(5), 418–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giardiello, F. M., Brensinger, J. D., Petersen, G. M., Luce, M. C., Hylind, L. M., Bacon, J. A., et al. (1997). The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336(12), 823–827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greendale, K., & Pyeritz, R. E. (2001). Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? how fast? how far? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106(3), 223–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey, E. K., Fogel, C. E., Peyrot, M., Christensen, K. D., Terry, S. F., & McInerney, J. D. (2007). Providers’ knowledge of genetics: a survey of 5915 individuals and families with genetic conditions. Genetics in Medicine, 9(5), 259–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayflick, S. J., Eiff, M. P., Carpenter, L., & Steinberger, J. (1998). Primary care physicians’ utilization and perceptions of genetics services. Genetics in Medicine, 1(1), 13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofman, K. J., Tambor, E. S., Chase, G. A., Geller, G., Faden, R. R., & Holtzman, N. A. (1993). Physicians’ knowledge of genetics and genetic tests. Academic Medicine, 68(8), 625–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindor, R. A., & Marchant, G. E. (2011). A review of medical malpractice claims related to clinical genetic testing. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(suppl). abstract 6073.Google Scholar
  15. Myers, M. F., Chang, M., Jorgensen, C., Whitworth, W., Kassim, S., Litch, J. A., et al. (2006). Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: evaluating the impact of a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign on physicians’ knowledge and practices. Genetics in Medicine, 8(6), 361–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. National Society of Genetic Counselors (2010). 2010 Professional Status Survey: Work environment. Retrieved from http://www.nsgc.org/MemberCenter/LeadershipCenter/tabid/190/Default.aspx?EntryId=286
  17. O’Shea, R., Murphy, A. M., Treacy, E., Lynch, S. A., Thirlaway, K., & Lambert, D. (2011). Communication of genetic information by other health professionals: the role of the genetic counsellor in specialist clinics. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(2), 192–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pelias, M. Z. (2004). Medicolegal aspects of prenatal diagnosis. In A. Milunsky (Ed.), Genetic disorders and the fetus: Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment (pp. 1105–1134). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ready, K. J., Daniels, M. S., Sun, C. C., Peterson, S. K., Northrup, H., & Lu, K. H. (2010). Obstetrics/gynecology residents’ knowledge of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome. Journal of Cancer Education, 25, 401–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmerler, S. (2008). Lessons learned: Risk management issues in genetic counseling. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Scholefield, J. H., Johnson, A. G., & Shorthouse, A. J. (1998). Current surgical practice in screening for colorectal cancer based on family history criteria. British Journal of Surgery, 85(11), 1543–1546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sifri, R. D. (2002). Cancer risk assessment from family history: gaps in primary care practice. Journal of Family Practice, 51(10), 856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, H., Schiesser, R., Anand, G., Richardson, P. A., & El-Serag, H. B. (2010). Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 8(6), 523–529.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suther, S., & Goodson, P. (2003). Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: a systematic review of the literature. Genetics in Medicine, 5(2), 70–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Task Force on Genetic Testing. (1998). In N. A. Holtzman & M. S. Watson (Eds.), Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States: Final report of the task force on genetic testing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Watson, E. K., Shickle, D., Qureshi, N., Emery, J., & Austoker, J. (1999). The ‘new genetics’ and primary care: GPs’ views on their role and their educational needs. Family Practice, 16(4), 420–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wideroff, L., Vadaparampil, S. T., Greene, M. H., Taplin, S., Olson, L., & Freedman, A. N. (2005). Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians. Journal of Medical Genetics, 42(10), 749–755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, G. L., Gray, J., & Beynon, J. (2007). Cancer genetics clinics and the surgeon: a valuable role for family history screening. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 89(2), 127–129.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wood, M. E., Stockdale, A., & Flynn, B. S. (2008). Interviews with primary care physicians regarding taking and interpreting the cancer family history. Family Practice, 25(5), 334–340.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy A. Bensend
    • 1
  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
    • 2
  • Kristin B. Niendorf
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.William C. Bernstein MD Familial Cancer Registry, Masonic Cancer CenterUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations