Skip to main content
Log in

Bias in the Reporting of Family History: Implications for Clinical Care

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Family history of cancer is critical for identifying and managing patients at risk for cancer. However, the quality of family history data is dependent on the accuracy of patient self reporting. Therefore, the validity of family history reporting is crucial to the quality of clinical care. A retrospective review of family history data collected at a community hospital between 2005 and 2009 was performed in 43,257 women presenting for screening mammography. Reported numbers of breast, colon, prostate, lung, and ovarian cancer were compared in maternal relatives vs. paternal relatives and in first vs. second degree relatives. Significant reporting differences were found between maternal and paternal family history of cancer, in addition to degree of relative. The number of paternal family histories of cancer was significantly lower than that of maternal family histories of cancer. Similarly, the percentage of grandparents’ family histories of cancer was significantly lower than the percentage of parents’ family histories of cancer. This trend was found in all cancers except prostate cancer. Self-reported family history in the community setting is often influenced by both bloodline of the cancer history and the degree of relative affected. This is evident by the underreporting of paternal family histories of cancer, and also, though to a lesser extent, by degree. These discrepancies in reporting family history of cancer imply we need to take more care in collecting accurate family histories and also in the clinical management of individuals in relation to hereditary risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 2006–2008 U.S. Census Bureau (2010). American Community Survey. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/

  • Abraham, L., Geller, B. M., et al. (2009). Accuracy of self-reported breast cancer among women undergoing mammography. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 118(3), 583–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acheson, L. S., Wiesner, G. L., et al. (2000). Family history-taking in community family practice: implications for genetic screening. Genetics in Medicine, 2(3), 180–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acheson, L. S., Zyzanski, S. J., et al. (2006). Validation of a self-administered, computerized tool for collecting and displaying the family history of cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(34), 5395–5402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antman, K., Abraido-Lanza, A. F., et al. (2002). Reducing disparities in breast cancer survival: a Columbia University and Avon Breast Cancer Research and Care Network Symposium. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 75(3), 269–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W., Culver, J., et al. (2009). Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 149A(3), 349–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. T., Smedby, K. E., et al. (2006). Reliability of self-reported family history of cancer in a large case-control study of lymphoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98(1), 61–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Couto, E., & Hemminki, K. (2007). Estimates of heritable and environmental components of familial breast cancer using family history information. British Journal of Cancer, 96(11), 1740–1742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15(3), 231–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, F. J., Jones, J. L., et al. (2005). Prevalence of hereditary breast/ovarian carcinoma risk in patients with a personal history of breast or ovarian carcinoma in a mammography population. Cancer, 104(9), 1849–1853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drohan, B., Ozanne, E. M., et al. (2009). Electronic health records and the management of women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The Breast Journal, 15(Suppl 1), S46–S55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., et al. (2003). To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64(4), 317–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Richards, M., et al. (1997). Family communication and genetic counseling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. S., Roche, C., et al. (2003). Prevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire. The Breast Journal, 9(1), 19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. L., Hughes, K. S., et al. (2005). Evaluation of hereditary risk in a mammography population. Clinical Breast Cancer, 6(1), 38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. C., Marks, J. H., et al. (2003). Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science, 302(5645), 643–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, P. L., Wideroff, L. et al. (2011). Prevalence of family history of breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer in a population-based study. Public Health Genomics. doi:10.1159/000294469

  • Mitchell, R. J., Brewster, D., et al. (2004). Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer. Gut, 53(2), 291–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mogilner, A., Otten, M., et al. (1998). Awareness and attitudes concerning BRCA gene testing. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 5(7), 607–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orom, H., Cote, M. L., et al. (2008). Family history of cancer: is it an accurate indicator of cancer risk in the immigrant population? Cancer, 112(2), 399–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orom, H., Kiviniemi, M. T., et al. (2010). Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites? Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 19(3), 746–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne, E. M., Drohan, B., et al. (2009a). Challenges and improvements in the identification of women at high risk. Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly, 20(3), 248–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne, E. M., Loberg, A., et al. (2009b). Identification and management of women at high risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome. The Breast Journal, 15(2), 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quillin, J. M., Ramakrishnan, V., et al. (2006). Paternal relatives and family history of breast cancer. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(3), 265–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, S. D., Yoon, P., et al. (2006). Population-based study of the prevalence of family history of cancer: implications for cancer screening and prevention. Genetics in Medicine, 8(9), 571–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E. C., Burke, W., et al. (2004). Reconsidering the family history in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(3), 273–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shabo, A., & Hughes, K. (2005). Family history information exchange services using HL7 clinical genomics standard specifications. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 142–165. doi:10.4018/jswis.2005100103

  • Tercyak, K. P., Hughes, C., et al. (2001). Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Patient Education and Counseling, 42(3), 213–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tinley, S. T., & Lynch, H. T. (1999). Integration of family history and medical management of patients with hereditary cancers. Cancer, 86(11 Suppl), 2525–2532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. J., Qureshi, N., et al. (2009). Systematic review: family history in risk assessment for common diseases. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(12), 878–885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, P. W., Scheuner, M. T., et al. (2002). Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventive medicine? Genetics in Medicine, 4(4), 304–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, P., Scheuner, M. T., et al. (2004). Awareness of family history as a risk factor for disease – United States, 2004. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. S. Hariri and S. Lyn. Atlanta. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 53, 1044–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziogas, A., & Anton-Culver, H. (2003). Validation of family history data in cancer family registries. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(2), 190–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by Philanthropic Funds from the MGH and the Sandra Perrin Fund for Women’s Imaging Education at Newton Wellesley Hospital. E. Ozanne’s work on this project was supported in part by grant number MRSG112037 from the American Cancer Society

Disclosures

Dr. Hughes is a co-developer of HughesRiskApps, a software package to help identify and manage women at high risk of hereditary disease. This software is currently not a commercial product and Dr. Hughes derives no financial benefit from its use. There is a potential of this product becoming commercial in the future.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin S. Hughes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozanne, E.M., O’Connell, A., Bouzan, C. et al. Bias in the Reporting of Family History: Implications for Clinical Care. J Genet Counsel 21, 547–556 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x

Keywords

Navigation