Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 432–441 | Cite as

Practice Guidelines for Communicating a Prenatal or Postnatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

  • Kathryn B. Sheets
  • Blythe G. Crissman
  • Cori D. Feist
  • Susan L. Sell
  • Lisa R. Johnson
  • Kelly C. Donahue
  • Diane Masser-Frye
  • Gail S. Brookshire
  • Amanda M. Carre
  • Danielle LaGrave
  • Campbell K. Brasington
Professional Issues

Abstract

Down syndrome is one of the most common conditions encountered in the genetics clinic. Due to improvements in healthcare, educational opportunities, and community inclusion over the past 30 years, the life expectancy and quality of life for individuals with Down syndrome have significantly improved. As prenatal screening and diagnostic techniques have become more enhanced and widely available, genetic counselors can expect to frequently provide information and support following a new diagnosis of Down syndrome. This guideline was written for genetic counselors and other healthcare providers regarding the communication of a diagnosis of Down syndrome to ensure that families are consistently given up-to-date and balanced information about the condition, delivered in a supportive and respectful manner.

Keywords

Down syndrome Trisomy 21 Genetic counseling National Society of Genetic Counselors Practice guidelines 

REFERENCES

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Genetics. (2001). Health supervision for children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics, 107(2), 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Genetics. (2007). AAP publications reaffirmed and retired. Pediatrics, 120(3), 683–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American College of Medical Genetics (2010). Standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories: Section E, Clinical Cytogenetics (E11.1). Retrieved from http://www.acmg.net/StaticContent/SGs/Section_E_2010.pdf
  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Practice Bulletins. (2007a). ACOG practice bulletin no. 77. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(1), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Practice Bulletins. (2007b). ACOG practice bulletin no. 88. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110(6), 1459–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biesecker, B. B. (2001). Goals of genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 60(5), 323–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasington, C. K. (2007). What I wish I knew then…Reflections from personal experiences in counseling about Down syndrome. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 731–734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R., Taylor, J., & Matthews, B. (2001). Quality of life—ageing and Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 6(3), 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryant, L. D., Murray, J., Green, J. M., Hewison, J., Sehmi, I., & Ellis, A. (2001). Descriptive information about Down syndrome: A content analysis of serum screening leaflets. Prenatal Diagnosis, 21, 1057–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, S., Bird, G., Sacks, B., & Archer, T. (2006). A comparison of mainstream and special education for teenagers with Down’s syndrome: Implications for parents and teachers. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 9(3), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, W. I. (1999). Health care guidelines for individuals with Down syndrome: 1999 revision. Down Syndrome Quarterly, 4(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Cooley, W. C. (1993). Supporting the family of the newborn with Down syndrome. Comprehensive Therapy, 19(3), 111–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson, M. A. (2008). Primary care for children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 55(5), 1099–1111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Souza, E., Halliday, J., Chan, A., Bower, C., & Morris, J. K. (2009). Recurrence risks for trisomies 13, 18, and 21. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 149A(12), 2716–2722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dent, K. M., & Carey, J. C. (2006). Breaking difficult news in a newborn setting: Down syndrome as a paradigm. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142(3), 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egan, J. F., Smith, K., Timms, D., Bolnick, J. M., Campbell, W. A., & Benn, P. A. (2011). Demographic differences in Down syndrome livebirths in the US from 1989 to 2006. Prenatal Diagnosis. doi:10.1002/pd.2702.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, R. J. M., & Sutherland, G. R. (2004). Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Glasson, E. J., Sullivan, S. G., Hussain, R., Petterson, B. A., Montgomery, P. D., & Bittles, A. H. (2002). The changing survival profile of people with Down’s syndrome: Implications for genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 62(5), 390–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harper, P. S. (2004). Practical genetic counselling (6th ed.). London: Edward Arnold, Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Hart, D., Grigal, M., Sax, C., Martinez, D., & Will, M. (2006). Postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities. Research to Practice, 45, 1–4.Google Scholar
  21. Hassold, T., & Sherman, S. (2000). Down syndrome: Genetic recombination and the origin of the extra chromosome 21. Clinical Genetics, 57(2), 95–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helm, D. T., Miranda, S., & Chedd, N. A. (1998). Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Mother’s reflections on supports needed from diagnosis to birth. Mental Retardation, 36(1), 55–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgson, J., & Spriggs, M. (2005). A practical account of autonomy: Why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(2), 89–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, K. L. (Ed.). (2006). Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Krahn, G. L., Hallum, A., & Kime, C. (1993). Are there good ways to give ‘bad news’? Pediatrics, 91(3), 578–582.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lejeune, J., Gautier, M., & Turpin, R. (1959). Etude des chromosomes somatiques de neuf enfants mongoliens. Les Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des sciences Paris, 248(11), 1721–1722.Google Scholar
  27. Leshin, L. (2002). Pediatric health update on Down syndrome. In W. I. Cohen, L. Nadel, & M. E. Madnick (Eds.), Down syndrome: Visions for the 21st century. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. National Society of Genetic Counselors. (1992). Code of ethics. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1(1), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker, S. E., Mai, C. T., Canfield, M. A., Rickard, R., Wang, Y., Meyer, R. E., et al. (2010). Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Research. Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 88(12), 1008–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patterson, B. (2002). Behavioral concerns in persons with Down syndrome. In W. I. Cohen, L. Nadel, & M. E. Madnick (Eds.), Down syndrome: Visions for the 21st Century. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Powell, N. (1991). Your baby has Down’s syndrome. Nursing Times, 87, 60–61.Google Scholar
  32. Pradhan, M., Dalal, A., Khan, F., & Agrawal, S. (2006). Fertility in men with Down syndrome: A case report. Fertility and Sterility, 86(6), 1765.e1–1765.e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act of 2008. Public Law 110–374, 122 Stat. 4051 (October 8, 2008)Google Scholar
  34. Pueschel, S., & Murphy, A. (1975). Counseling parents of infants with Down’s syndrome. Postgraduate Medicine, 58(7), 90–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pueschel, S. M., & Murphy, A. (1976). Assessment of counseling practices at the birth of a child with Down’s syndrome. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(4), 325–330.Google Scholar
  36. Rihtman, T., Tekuzner, E., Parush, S., Tenebaum, A., Bachrach, S. J., & Ornoy, A. (2010). Are the cognitive functions of children with Down syndrome related to their participation? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 52(1), 72–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savva, G. M., Morris, J. K., Mutton, D. E., & Alberman, E. (2006). Maternal age-specific fetal loss rates in Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 26(6), 499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheets, K. B., Best, R. G., Brasington, C. K., & Will, M. C. (2011). Balanced information about Down syndrome: What is essential? American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.34018 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Skotko, B. (2005a). Mothers of children with Down syndrome reflect on their postnatal support. Pediatrics, 115(1), 64–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Skotko, B. G. (2005b). Communicating the postnatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome: An international call for change. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 31, 237–243.Google Scholar
  41. Skotko, B. G. (2005c). Prenatally diagnosed Down syndrome: Mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192(3), 670–677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skotko, B., & Bedia, R. C. (2005). Postnatal support for mothers of children with Down syndrome. Mental Retardation, 43(3), 196–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skotko, B. G., Capone, G. T., Kishnani, P. S., & for the Down Syndrome Diagnosis Study Group. (2009). Postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Synthesis of the evidence on how to best deliver the news. Pediatrics, 124(4), e751–e758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skotko, B. G., Kishnani, P. S., Capone, G. T., & for the Down Syndrome Diagnosis Study Group. (2009). Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: How best to deliver the news. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 149A(11), 2361–2367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snijders, R. J. M., Sundberg, K., Holzgreve, W., Henry, G., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1999). Maternal age-and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 13(3), 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Warburton, D., Dallaire, L., Thangavelu, M., Ross, L., Levin, B., & Kline, J. (2004). Trisomy recurrence: A reconsideration based on North American data. American Journal of Human Genetics, 75, 376–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams, C., Alderson, P., & Farsides, B. (2002). What constitutes balanced information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down’s syndrome? Midwifery, 18, 230–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn B. Sheets
    • 1
  • Blythe G. Crissman
    • 1
  • Cori D. Feist
    • 2
  • Susan L. Sell
    • 3
  • Lisa R. Johnson
    • 4
  • Kelly C. Donahue
    • 5
  • Diane Masser-Frye
    • 6
  • Gail S. Brookshire
    • 7
  • Amanda M. Carre
    • 8
  • Danielle LaGrave
    • 9
  • Campbell K. Brasington
    • 10
  1. 1.Division of Medical GeneticsDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Division of Maternal Fetal MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeneticsPenn State Hershey Children’s HospitalHersheyUSA
  4. 4.Center for Maternal-Fetal MedicineDaytonUSA
  5. 5.Division of Maternal Fetal MedicineWest Penn Allegheny Health SystemPittsburghUSA
  6. 6.Department of Genetics and DysmorphologyRady Children’s HospitalSan DiegoUSA
  7. 7.Department of Genetics and MetabolismChildren’s Medical CenterDallasUSA
  8. 8.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDrexel University College of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  9. 9.Genetics Division, ARUP LaboratoriesSalt Lake CityUSA
  10. 10.Department of Clinical GeneticsCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations