Attitudes of Genetic Counselors Towards Genetic Susceptibility Testing in Children
- 275 Downloads
Genetic susceptibility research and testing is leading to an era of personalized medicine. Genetic counselors act as liaisons between the medical genetics community and the public. Understanding the opinions of genetic counselors will be important in developing testing guidelines. Attitudes towards genetic susceptibility testing in children were assessed for 216 NSGC members. Genetic counselors were likely to support testing if the results would determine: disease progression or prognosis, likelihood of survival after a specific treatment, or risk for an adverse drug reaction. Genetic counselors were unlikely to support testing to determine susceptibility to later disease development or in the absence of available intervention. There was a strong positive correlation between attitudes associated with desire to test their own child, if at risk and their support for genetic testing in any child at risk. Respondents strongly favored parent/guardian and child’s rights over doctor or insurance rights. They indicated assent should be obtained prior to testing, when appropriate, and that a copy of results should be kept in a permanent medical record. Respondents expressed concerns about insurance discrimination, testing in the absence of medical necessity, and taking away a child’s autonomy.
KeywordsGenetic testing Susceptibility Children Attitudes Genetic counselors Guidelines Discrimination Autonomy
The work for this grant was supported in part by funding from the National Institutes of Health (1R03HD057407-01A2)(JU, EI).
- Bernhardt, B., Tambor, E., Fraser, G., Wissow, L., & Geller, G. (2003). Parents’ and children’s attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: implications for informed consent. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 116(4), 315–323.Google Scholar
- Campbell, E., & Ross, L. (2003). Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 120(2), 209–214.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. (2002). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Laegsgaard, M., & Mors, O. (2007). Psychiatric genetic testing: attitudes and intentions among future users and providers. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics.Google Scholar
- National Society of Genetic Counselors (1995–2008). Position Statements Retrieved April 6, 2008, from http://www.nsgc.org/about/position.cfm#Prenatal_two.
- Nussbaum, R., McInnes, R., & Willard, H. (2007). Thompson & Thompson: Genetics in medicine (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Parrott, S., & Del Vecchio, M. (2007). Professional status survey 2006.Google Scholar