Abstract
Ethical issues are an inevitable part of genetic counseling practice. Prior research identified 16 domains of ethical and professional challenges encountered by practitioners in the United States. In order to further validate these domains, the present study surveyed Australian genetic counselors. Sixty-three respondents rated the frequency with which they encountered each domain, and 39 individuals also provided personal anecdotes detailing their most challenging ethical and professional dilemmas. Every domain reportedly was experienced by the Australian sample. However, there were some differences between Australian respondents and U.S. genetic counselors in frequencies of domain occurrence, and in strategies recommended for resolving them. Several anecdotes illustrate challenging situations due to Australia’s geography, universal healthcare system, and the genetic counseling profession’s evolution in that country. The results generally validate domains identified for U.S. genetic counselors. They further suggest that certain ethical issues may manifest in ways unique to a given country, and therefore they must be addressed in a culturally-appropriate manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics.(2006) Census table: Ancestry by birthplace of parents by sex-Australia. https://doi.org/www.abs.gov.au. Accessed March 18, 2008.
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.(2000) The Australian Health Care System: An Outline. Financing and Analysis Branch. Retrieved March 3, 2007, from https://doi.org/www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/haf-ozhealth-index.
Begleiter, M. L. (2002). Training for genetic counsellors. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 3, 557–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg844.
Bower, M. A., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A Survey of genetic counselors’ strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 163–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015275022199.
Callahan, T. C., Durfy, S. J., & Jonsen, A. R. (1995). Ethical reasoning in clinical genetics: a survey of cases and methods. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 6, 248–253.
Duncan, R. E., Gillam, L., Savulescu, J., Williamson, R., Rogers, J. G., & Delatycki, M. B. (2007). “Holding your breath”: Interviews with young people who have undergone predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 143A, 1984–1989. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.31720.
James, C., Worthington, S., & Colley, A. (2003). The genetic counseling workplace-An Australasian perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 439–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025868804314.
Kenen, R. H. (1986). Growing pains of a new health care field: Genetic counselling in Australia and the United States. The Australian Journal of Social Issues, 172–182.
Maley, J. A. (1994). An ethics casebook for genetic counselors. Charlottesville, VA: Center for Biomedical Ethics and Division of Medical Genetics, University of Virginia.
McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2001). Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: A report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 97–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009487513618.
Parliamentary Counsel Office.Privacy Act 1993. https://doi.org/www.legislation.govt.nz
Pencarinha, D. F., Bell, N. K., Edwards, J. G., & Best, R. G. (1992). Ethical issues in genetic counseling: a comparison of M.S. counselor and medical geneticist perspectives. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1, 19–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960081.
Richards, F. H. (2006). Maturity of judgment in decision making for predictive testing for nontreatable adult-onset neurogenetic conditions: a case against predictive testing of minors. Clinical Genetics, 70, 396–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00696.x.
Sahhar, M. A., Young, M., Sheffield, L. J., & Aitken, M. (2005). Educating genetic counselors in Australia: developing an international perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 283–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-0572-1.
Tassicker, R. J., Marshall, P. K., Liebeck, T. A., Keville, M. A., Singaram, B. M., Richards, F. H., et al. (2006). Predictive and pre-natal testing for huntington disease in Australia: results and challenges encountered during a 10-year period (1994–2003). Clinical Genetics, 70, 480–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00701.x.
Taylor, S., Treloar, S., Barlow-Stewart, K., Stranger, M., & Otlowski, M. (2008). Investigating genetic discrimination in Australia: a large-scale survey of clinical genetics clients. Clinical Genetics, 74, 20–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01016.x.
Weil, J. (2002). Genetic counselling in the era of genomic medicine. European Molecular Biology Organization, 3, 590–593.
Wertz, D. C., & Fletcher, J. C. (1988). Ethics and medical genetics in the United States: a national survey. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 29, 815–827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320290411.
Wertz, D. C., & Fletcher, J. C. (1989). Moral reasoning among medical geneticists in eighteen nations. Theoretical Medicine, 10, 123–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00539878.
Acknowledgments
This study was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the first author’s Master of Science degree from the University of Minnesota. We are grateful to the respondents for taking the time to provide such thoughtful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alliman, S., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D.M. et al. A Comparative Analysis of Ethical and Professional Challenges Experienced by Australian and U.S. Genetic Counselors. J Genet Counsel 18, 379–394 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9229-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9229-9