Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 713–728 | Cite as

Coming Full Circle: A Reciprocal-Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice

  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
  • Dianne M. Bartels
  • Bonnie S. LeRoy
Original Research

Abstract

As genetic health care and genetic testing expand from primarily addressing conditions that are exclusively genetic in nature to common diseases with both genetic and environmental components, the scope of genetic counseling has grown. Identification and utilization of a normative model of practice defined by members of the profession is critical as genetic services become more commonplace in medical care. The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of a consensus conference convened to define a model of genetic counseling practice based on the guidance of educators and leaders in the profession. Twenty-three program directors or their representatives from 20 genetic counseling graduate programs in North America listened to presentations and participated in group discussions aimed at determining the elements of a model of practice, including tenets, goals, strategies, and behaviors for addressing patients’ genetic concerns. Their discussion is summarized, training implications and research recommendations are presented, and a model of practice that extends their ideas is proposed.

Keywords

Genetic counseling practice model Genetic counseling consensus meeting Genetic counseling tenets Goals Strategies Genetic counselor behaviors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported in part by a grant from the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment, and the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota.

We would like to thank our consensus conference participants: Bonnie Baty, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Nancy Callanan, Fiona Field, Betsy Gettig, Ann Greb, Robin Grubs, Susan Hassed, Caroline Lieber, Anne Matthews, Sarah Noblin, Kelly Ormond, John Quillin, Casey Reiser, Cheryl Schuman, Kathryn Spitzer Kim, Carol Walton, Nancy Warren, Cathy Wicklund, Lori Williamson Cruse, Bev Yashar, and Randy Zinberg. We also thank our presenters, Michelle Fox, Robert Resta, and Jon Weil, for their valuable consultation regarding development of the conference format and content, for their excellent presentations, for their assistance with group discussions, and for their feedback on this paper. We thank Ling-Hsuan Tung for her assistance with the literature review for this project. Finally, we are grateful to the reviewers and the Editor of this journal for their incisive comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. American Board of Genetic Counseling. (1996). Journal of Genetic Counseling, 5, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Human Genetics. (1975). Genetic counseling. Journal of Human Genetics, 27, 240–242.Google Scholar
  3. Bartels, D. M., LeRoy, B. S., McCarthy, P., & Caplan, A. L. (1997). Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: A survey of practitioners. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 72, 172–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benkendorf, J., Prince, M., Rose, M. A., De Fina, A., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). Does indirect speech promote non-directive genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 19–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: Client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biesecker, B., & Peters, K. (2001). Process studies in genetic counseling: Peering into the black box. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 191–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowles Biesecker, B. (2003). Back to the future of genetic counseling: Commentary on “Psychosocial counseling in a post-nondirective era: A point of view.” Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brazen, L. (1992). Project 2000: The difference between conceptual models, practice models. AORN Journal, 56, 840–844.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapple, A., May, C., & Campion, P. (1995). Lay understanding of genetic diseases: A British study of families attending a genetic counseling service. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 4, 281–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davey, A., Rostant, K., Harrop, K., Goldblatt, J., & O’Leary, P. (2005). Evaluating genetic counseling: Client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 197–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duric, V., Butow, P., Sharpe, L., Lobb, E., Meiser, B., Barratt, A. et al. (2003). Reducing psychological distress in a genetic counseling consultation for breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellington, L., Roter, D., Dudley, W. N., Baty, B. J., Upchurch, R., Larson, S. et al. (2005). Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 377–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellington, L., Baty, B. J., McDonald, J., Venne, V., Musters, A., Roter, D. et al. (2006). Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: The role of teaching and counseling approaches. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 179–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallowell, N., Statham, H., Murton, F., Green, J., & Richards, M. (1997). “Talking about chance”: The presentation of risk information during genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Itzhaky, H., Gerber, P., & Dekel, R. (2004). Empowerment, skills and values: A comparative study of nurses and social workers. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 447–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janson, G. R. (1998, September). A journey to a theory. Counseling Today, 46.Google Scholar
  17. Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: IX. Teaching and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler, S. (2000). Closing thoughts on supervision. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, L. J. (2002). Models of genetic counseling and their effects on multicultural genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 193–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Tucker, K., & Barratt, D.M. (2001). How do geneticists and genetic counselors counsel women from high-risk breast cancer families? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lobb, E., Butow, P., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., & Tucker, K. (2005). Differences in individual approaches: Communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 43–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacLeod, R., Craufurd, D., & Booth, K. (2002). Patients’ perceptions of what makes genetic counseling effective: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marks, J. H. (1993). The training of genetic counselors: Origins of a psychosocial model. In D. M. Bartels, B. S. LeRoy, & A. L. Caplan (eds.). Prescribing our future: Ethical challenges in genetic counseling, (pp. 15–24). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  24. Marks, J. H. (2003). The importance of genetic counseling: 2003 ASHG award for excellence in human genetics education. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 395–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matloff, E. T. (1994). Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 3, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCarthy Veach, P., Truesdell, S. E., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (1999). Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: An exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). Commentary: Genetic counseling—A profession in search of itself? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (2003). Facilitating the genetic counseling relationship: A manual for practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. McConkie-Rosell, A., & Sullivan, J. A. (1999). Genetic counseling—Stress, coping, and the empowerment perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 8, 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michie, S., Bron, F., Bobrow, M., & Marteau, T. (1997). Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: An empirical study. American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 40–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2006). The code of ethics of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nix, J., & Dillon, K. (1986). Short-term nursing therapy: A conceptual model for inpatient psychiatric care. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 37, 493–496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Reed, S. C. (1975). A short history of genetic counseling. Social Biology, 21, 332–339.Google Scholar
  34. Resta, R. G. (2006). Defining and redefining the scope and goals of genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics Part C, 142C, 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Resta, R. G., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Hahn, S. E., Strecker, M. N. et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rieh, J. P., & Ray, C. (1974). Conceptual models for nursing practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  37. Roter, D., Ellington, L., Hamby Erby, L., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): Models of practice. American Journal of Human Genetics Part C: Sem in Med Genet, 142C, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shiloh, S. (2006). Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: A theoretical review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 325–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skirton, H. (2001). The client’s perspective of genetic counseling—A grounded theory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spielberger, C. D., & Stenmark, D. E. (1985). Community psychology. In E. Altmeier, & M. E. Meyer (eds.). Applied Specialties in Psychology, (pp. 75–97). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, A. (1998). The Practice of Genetic Counseling. In D. J. Baker, J. Schuette, & W. Uhlmann (eds.) A Guide to Genetic Counseling, (pp. 1–26). New York: Wiley, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. Wang, C., Gonzalez, R., & Merajver, S. D. (2004). Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: Current research and future directions. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1427–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in a post-nondirectiveness era: A point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 199–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weil, J., Ormond, K., Peters, J., Peters, K., Biesecker, B. B., & LeRoy, B. (2006). The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: Report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 85–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
    • 1
  • Dianne M. Bartels
    • 2
  • Bonnie S. LeRoy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, 206 Burton HallUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Center for BioethicsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations