Ethical Issues in Cancer Genetics: 1) Whose Information Is It?
This article presents and discusses four clinical cases that exemplify the complexity of ethical dilemmas concerning the provider’s obligation to disclose or withhold genetic information from patients.
Case 1: What is the responsibility of the cancer genetics provider to ensure that a positive test results is shared with distant relatives?
Case 2: To ensure that results go to at-risk relatives, do we have the right to ignore the wishes of the designated next-of-kin?
Case 3: Do we have the right to reveal a familial BRCA1 mutation to a patient’s relative, who is at 50% risk?
Case 4: Do we have an obligation to reveal that a patient is not a blood relative and therefore, not at risk to have inherited a familial mutation?
These cases form the basis for discussing the provider’s dual obligations to keeping patient confidentiality and informing patients and families about risk (i.e. duty to warn). We also provide a summary of consensus points and additional discussion questions for each case.
KEY WORDSethical issues ethical dilemmas cancer genetic counseling genetic testing confidentiality issues.
- Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, A., Eyfjord, E., Hopper, J. L., et al. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet, 72, 1117–1130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bryant, J., Baggott la Velle, L., & Searle, J. (2005). Ethics and Bioethics. In Introduction to Bioethics (pp. 17–28). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, L. C., Sellers, T. A., Schaid, D. J., Frank, T. S., Soderberg, C. L., Sitta, D. L., et al. (2001). Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Natl Cancer Inst, 93, 1633–1637.Google Scholar
- Maley, J. A. (1994). An Ethics Casebook for Genetic Counselors. Wallingford, PA: A publication of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.Google Scholar
- Patenaude, A. (2005) Cancer Genes and Cancer Risk. In Genetic Testing for Cancer: Psychological Approaches for helping Patients and Families (pp. 41–73). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Pentz, R. D., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B., Vernon, S. W., Lynch, P. M., Koehly, L. M., et al. (2005). Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family members’ perceptions about the duty to inform and health professionals’ role in disseminating genetic information. Genetic Testing, 9, 261–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Safer v Estate of Pack (1996). 677 A.2d 1188, NJ Super A.D.Google Scholar
- Schneider, K. A., & Li, F. (Updated 10/12/2004). Li-Fraumeni syndrome. In: GeneReviews at GeneTests: Medical Genetics Information Resource (database online). Copyright, University of Washington, Seattle. 1997–2006. Available at http://www.genetests.org. Accessed January 17, 2005.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. H., Quaid, K. A., Dworkin, R. B., Gramelspacher, G. P., Granbois, J. A., & Vance, G. H. (1998). Guideline V: Confidentiality. In Early Warning: Cases and ethical guidance for presymptomatic testing in genetic diseases. (pp. 144–148) Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Suthers, G. K., Armstrong, J., McCormack, J., and Trott, D. (2005). Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. J Med Genet, (epub, in press).Google Scholar
- United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and Amendments. 164.512(j). Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa Accessed on-line on January 17, 2005.Google Scholar