The Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP) is a widely used instrument to assess the potential for child abuse. The brief version of the CAP (BCAP) is a proven time-efficient screener tool. This investigation aims to propose a Spanish BCAP version by analyzing the factor structure of its Abuse Scale (aim 1) and, if needed, developing a valid BCAP Lie Scale (aim 2). Study 1 comprised 205 mothers with problems coping with their children’s behavior recruited from family support and treatment programs. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency, and convergent validity were conducted. Study 2 applied an experimental between-subject design to assess a convenience sample of the Spanish population (N = 260) with 124 participants in Condition 1 (honest) and 136 in Condition 2 (lie). Differences between conditions were analyzed. Study 1: CFA showed adequate fit indices for the seven-factor model (RMSEA = .04 CFI = .98, TLI = .98). Internal consistency and convergent validity were adequate for the Abuse Scale. Findings also showed that the BCAP Lie Scale does not accomplish the main requirements to detect participants answering in a socially desirable way. Study 2: A new set of six items showing significant differences between conditions (U = 15,481.00, z = 11.14, p < .001, r = .77) is proposed to compose the Lie Scale. The findings support that the Spanish BCAP is a valid instrument to assess mothers recruited from Child Protection Services. The new BCAP Lie Scale could be useful to select valid inventories. Further research with more representative samples is recommended.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index: Professional manual (3rd ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc..
Arruabarrena, I., & De Paúl, J. (1992). Convergent validity of the preliminary Spanish version of the child abuse potential inventory: Depression and marital adjustment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(92)90012-G.
Arruabarrena, I., & De Paúl, J. (2002). Evaluation of a treatment program for child abusive and high-risk families [Evaluación de un programa de tratamiento para familias maltratantes y negligentes y familias alto-riesgo]. Psychosocial Intervention, 11(2), 213–228.
Azar, S. T., Yuko, O., Stevenson, M. T., & Robinson, L. R. (2013). A preliminary test of a social information processing model of parenting risk in adolescent males at risk for later physical child abuse in adulthood. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2244.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory- II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Casillas, K. L., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B. T., & Garrido, E. F. (2016). Implementation of evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse and Neglect, 53, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.009.
Chen, M., & Chan, K. L. (2016). Effects of parenting programs on child maltreatment prevention: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 17(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566718.
Dawe, S., Taplin, S., & Mattick, R. P. (2017). Psychometric investigation of the brief child abuse potential inventory in mothers on opioid substitution therapy. Journal of Family Violence, 32(3), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9821-3.
De Paúl, J., Arruabarrena, I., & Milner, J. S. (1991). Validation of a Spanish version of the child abuse potential inventory administered in Spain. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 495–504.
De Paúl, J., Arruabarrena, I., Múgica, P., & Milner, J. (1999). Validation of the Spanish version of the child abuse potential inventory. Estudios de Psicología, 20(63–64), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1174/02109399960256766.
De Paúl, J., Asla, N., Pérez-Albéniz, A., & Torres-Gómez de Cádiz, B. (2006). Impact of stress and mitigating information on evaluations, attributions, affect, disciplinary choices, and expectations of compliance in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(8), 1018–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506290411.
De Paúl, J., Pérez-Albéniz, A., Guibert, M., Asla, N., & Ormaechea, A. (2008). Dispositional empathy in neglectful mothers and mothers at high risk for child physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313532.
Ellonen, N., Rantanen, H., Lepistö, S., Helminen, M., & Paavilainen, E. (2019). The use of the brief child abuse potential inventory in the general population in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 37(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1608629.
Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., Jones, L., & Dunne, M. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2(8), e356–e366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4.
Johnson, T. P., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003). Social desirability in cross-cultural research. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 195–204). New York: Wiley.
Kennedy, S. C., Kim, J. S., Tripodi, S. J., Brown, S. M., & Gowdy, G. (2016). Does parent–child interaction therapy reduce future physical abuse? A meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514543024.
Laulik, S., Allam, J., & Browne, K. (2015). The use of the child abuse potential inventory in the assessment of parents involved in care proceedings. Child Abuse Review, 24(5), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2294.
Levey, E. J., Gelaye, B., Bain, P., Rondon, M. B., Borba, C. P. C., Henderson, D. C., & Williams, M. A. (2017). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions designed to decrease child abuse in high-risk families. Child Abuse and Neglect, 65, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.004.
Liel, C., Meinck, F., Steinert, J. I., Kindler, H., Lang, K., & Eickhorst, A. (2019). Is the brief child abuse potential inventory (BCAPI) a valid measure of child abuse potential among mothers and fathers of young children in Germany? Child Abuse & Neglect, 88, 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.008.
McNary, S. W., & Black, M. M. (2003). Use of the child abuse potential inventory as a measure of treatment outcome. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27(5), 459–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00040-1.
Milner, J. S. (1982). Development of a lie scale for the child abuse potential inventory. Psychological Reports, 50(3), 871–874. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.19126.96.36.1991.
Milner, J. S. (1986). The child abuse potential inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Webster: Psytec.
Milner, J. S. (1993). Social information processing and physical child abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 13(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(93)90024-G.
Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The child abuse potential inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(6), 547–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(94)90017-5.
Milner, J. S., & Crouch, J. L. (2012). Psychometric characteristics of translated versions of the child abuse potential inventory. Psychology of Violence, 2(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026957.
Milner, J. S., & Crouch, J. L. (2017). Child physical abuse risk assessment: Parent and family evaluations. In J. C. Campbell & J. T. Messing (Eds.), Assessing dangerousness: Domestic violence offenders and child abusers (3rd ed., pp. 55–87). New York: Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826133274.
Montes, P., De Paúl, J., & Milner, J. S. (2001). Evaluations, attributions, affect, and disciplinary choices in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(8), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00254-X.
Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 9(11), e1001349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349.
Ondersma, S. J., Chaffin, M. J., Mullins, S. M., & Lebreton, J. M. (2005). A brief form of the child abuse potential inventory: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3402_9.
Pérez-Albeniz, A., & De Paúl, J. (2005). Empathy in individuals at risk for child physical abuse: The effects of victim’s pain cues on aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 31(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20067.
Pérez-Albeniz, A., & De Paúl, J. (2006). Empathy and risk status for child physical abuse: The effects of an adult victim’s pain cues and an adult victim’s intent on aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 32(5), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20142.
Rodriguez, C. M. (2013). Analog of parental empathy : Association with physical child abuse risk and punishment intentions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(8), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.10.004.
Stoltenborgh, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Alink, L. R. A., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: Review of a series of meta-analyses. Child Abuse Review, 24(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2353.
van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 54(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004.
van der Put, C. E., Assink, M., & Boekhout van Solinge, N. F. (2017). Predicting child maltreatment: A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of risk assessment instruments. Child Abuse and Neglect, 73(July), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.016.
Walker, C. A., & Davies, J. (2010). A critical review of the psychometric evidence base of the child abuse potential inventory. Journal of Family Violence, 25(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9285-9.
Walker, C. A., & Davies, J. (2012). A cross-cultural validation of the brief child abuse potential inventory (BCAP). Journal of Family Violence, 27(7), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9458-9.
This research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) of Spain [PSI2013-46272-P] and by a grant from the University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU) [PIF2016/188].
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rivas, G.R., Arruabarrena, I. & De Paúl, J. Spanish Validation of the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (BCAP). J Fam Viol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00253-w
- Child abuse potential
- Child maltreatment
- Psychometric properties
- Lie scale